Merit Review. Each department will appoint two faculty members to an advisory review committee that will be charged with tracking the progress and providing advice to Professor [XXXX]. The advisory committee will be chaired by a member of the Department of [Home Dept]. While Professor [XXXX] is a junior faculty member, the advisory review committee will meet with the latter annually, review the record, and provide recommendations to each department regarding the teaching, research, and service. The committee members are expected to keep in close communication with Professor [▇▇▇▇] regarding teaching, research, and service. After receiving merit recommendations from the advisory committee, the Chairs of the two departments will consult to reach a common understanding of the progress and merit of Professor [XXXX]. If possible, this consultation should take place before the annual meeting that each Chair will have with Professor [XXXX] Merit reviews will be handled according to the policies of each department. When the reviews have been completed the Chair/Director of [Dept1] and the Chair/Director of [Dept2] will confer and agree on a salary increase. Recommendations for salary increases must take into account both merit and equity. Both the Chairs/Directors will advise on the relative levels of merit and the amount of the salary increase that should be given on the basis of merit. Salary inequities will be considered relative to the salary profiles of both departments.
Appears in 1 contract
Sources: Memorandum of Understanding
Merit Review. Each department will appoint two faculty members to an advisory review committee that will be charged with tracking the progress and providing advice to Professor [XXXX]. The advisory committee will be chaired by a member of the Department of [Home Dept]. While Professor [XXXX] is a junior faculty member, the advisory review committee will meet with the latter annually, review the record, and provide recommendations to each department regarding the teaching, research, and service. The committee members are expected to keep in close communication with Professor [XXXX] ▇▇▇▇] regarding arding teaching, research, and service. After receiving merit recommendations from the advisory committee, the Chairs of the two departments will consult to reach a common understanding of the progress and merit of Professor [XXXX]. If possible, this consultation should take place before the annual meeting that each Chair will have with Professor [XXXX] Merit reviews will be handled according to the policies of each department. When the reviews have been completed the Chair/Director of [Dept1] and the Chair/Director of [Dept2] will confer and agree on a salary increase. Recommendations for salary increases must take into account both merit and equity. Both the Chairs/Directors will advise on the relative levels of merit and the amount of the salary increase that should be given on the basis of merit. Salary inequities will be considered relative to the salary profiles of both departments.
Appears in 1 contract
Sources: Memorandum of Understanding