Merit Evaluation Sample Clauses

The Merit Evaluation clause establishes a process for assessing the value, quality, or suitability of proposals, work, or claims based on their merits rather than solely on price or other factors. In practice, this clause typically outlines the criteria and procedures by which submissions are reviewed, such as technical expertise, past performance, or innovative solutions, and may involve a scoring or ranking system. Its core function is to ensure that decisions are made fairly and objectively, promoting the selection of the most qualified or advantageous option and reducing the risk of arbitrary or biased choices.
Merit Evaluation. NOTE: Merit decisions are not subject to the grievance procedure. See Section 6, Procedural Due Process, in the Tenure Article.
View SourceView Similar (9)
Merit Evaluation. 1. Every employee shall receive an objective, written job performance rating, no sooner than three (3) weeks before, no later than five (5) working days before the date of eligibility for each salary step, merit longevity or hourly increase, and annually thereafter, and upon a change of employment status. Nothing in this Section shall prohibit the department head or authorized supervisor from giving an additional objective rating to an employee between those periods of time described in this Section. 2. It shall be the duty of the department head to delegate the responsibility of every employee’s rating to that level of supervision having immediate knowledge of the employee's work. An employee shall be rated by his immediate supervisor and that rating shall be reviewed by the department head.
View SourceView Similar (4)
Merit Evaluation. The first merit evaluation - based wage adjustment for which the job classifications named in the Schedule of Wages in Appendix I are eligible will occur no earlier than September 2019, with the associated evaluation-of-performance period beginning on July 22, 2018, and along with all other employees participating in the merit evaluation program.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Merit Evaluation. The evaluation-of-performance period will begin on or about July 22, 2022, along with all other employees participating in the merit evaluation program. However, to avoid doubt, during the duration of this Agreement, the employees identified in Appendix I shall not be eligible for merit-evaluation increases.
View Source
Merit Evaluation. 1. Every employee shall receive an objective, written job performance rating no sooner than three (3) weeks before, nor later than five (5) working days before the date of eligibility for each salary step, merit longevity or hourly increase, and annually thereafter, and upon a change of employment status. Nothing in this Section shall prohibit the department head or an authorized supervisor from giving an additional objective rating to an employee between those periods of time described in this section. 2. An employee shall receive a rating from the supervisor(s) having knowledge of the employee's performance. This rating shall be reviewed by the department head. If an employee does not receive a merit increase due to the performance evaluation rating, the employee may appeal through the Grievance Procedure. If an employee can show that other employees have received merit increases and have received substantially the same performance evaluation within the last twelve (12) months of that being appealed, that fact shall be sufficient to support the appeal.
View Source
Merit Evaluation. 1. Every employee shall receive an objective, written job performance rating, no sooner than five
View Source

Related to Merit Evaluation

  • JOC EVALUATION If any materials being utilized for a project cannot be found in the RS Means Price Book, this question is what is the markup percentage on those materials? When answering this question please insert the number that represents your percentage of proposed markup. Example: if you are proposing a 30 percent markup, please insert the number "30". Remember that this is a ceiling markup. You may markup a lesser percentage to the TIPS Member customer when pricing the project, but not a greater percentage. EXAMPLE: You need special materials that are not in the RS Means Unit Price Book for a project. You would buy the materials and ▇▇▇▇ them up to the TIPS Member customer by the percentage you propose in this question. If the materials cost you, the contractor, $100 and you proposed a markup on this question for the material of 30 percent, then you would charge the TIPS Member customer $130 for the materials. TIPS/ESC Region 8 is required by Texas Government Code § 791 to be compensated for its work and thus, failure to agree shall render your response void and it will not be considered. Vendor agrees to remit to TIPS the required administration fee or, if resellers are named, guarantee the fee remittance by or for the reseller named by the vendor?

  • PROGRESS EVALUATION Engineer shall, from time to time during the progress of the Engineering Services, confer with County at County’s election. Engineer shall prepare and present such information as may be pertinent and necessary, or as may be reasonably requested by County, in order for County to evaluate features of the Engineering Services. At the request of County or Engineer, conferences shall be provided at Engineer's office, the offices of County, or at other locations designated by County. When requested by County, such conferences shall also include evaluation of the Engineering Services. County may, from time to time, require Engineer to appear and provide information to the Williamson County Commissioners Court. Should County determine that the progress in Engineering Services does not satisfy an applicable Work Authorization or any Supplemental Work Authorization related thereto, then County shall review same with Engineer to determine corrective action required. Engineer shall promptly advise County in writing of events which have or may have a significant impact upon the progress of the Engineering Services, including but not limited to the following: A. Problems, delays, adverse conditions which may materially affect the ability to meet the objectives of an applicable Work Authorization or any Supplemental Work Authorization related thereto, or preclude the attainment of Project Engineering Services units by established time periods; and such disclosure shall be accompanied by statement of actions taken or contemplated, and County assistance needed to resolve the situation, if any; and B. Favorable developments or events which enable meeting goals sooner than anticipated in relation to an applicable Work Authorization’s or any Supplemental Work Authorization related thereto.

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

  • Annual Evaluation The Partnership will be evaluated on an annual basis through the use of the Strategic Partnership Annual Evaluation Format as specified in Appendix C of OSHA Instruction CSP ▇▇-▇▇-▇▇▇, OSHA Strategic Partnership Program for Worker Safety and Health. The Choate Team will be responsible for gathering required participant data to evaluate and track the overall results and success of the Partnership. This data will be shared with OSHA. OSHA will be responsible for writing and submitting the annual evaluation.

  • Job Evaluation The work of the provincial job evaluation steering committee (the JE Committee) will continue during the term of this Framework Agreement. The objectives of the JE Committee are as follows: • Review the results of the phase one and phase two pilots and outcomes of the committee work. Address any anomalies identified with the JE tool, process, or benchmarks. • Rate the provincial benchmarks and create a job hierarchy for the provincial benchmarks. • Gather data from all school districts and match existing job descriptions to the provincial benchmarks. • Identify the job hierarchy for local job descriptions for all school districts. • Compare the local job hierarchy to the benchmark-matched hierarchy. • Develop a methodology to convert points to pay bands - The confirmed method must be supported by current compensation best practices. • Identify training requirements to support implementation of the JE plan and develop training resources as required. Once the objectives outlined above are completed, the JE Committee will mutually determine whether a local, regional or provincial approach to the steps outlined above is appropriate. It is recognized that the work of the committee is technical, complicated, lengthy and onerous. To accomplish the objectives, the parties agree that existing JE funds can be accessed by the JE committee to engage consultant(s) to complete this work. It is further recognized that this process does not impact the established management right of employers to determine local job requirements and job descriptions nor does this process alter any existing collective agreement rights or established practices. When the JE plan is ready to be implemented, and if an amendment to an existing collective agreement is required, the JE Committee will work with the local School District and Local Union to make recommendations for implementation. Any recommendations will also be provided to the Provincial Labour Management Committee (PLMC). As mutually agreed by the provincial parties and the JE Committee, the disbursement of available JE funds shall be retroactive to January 2, 2020. The committee will utilize available funds to provide 50% of the wage differential for the position falling the furthest below the wage rate established by the provincial JE process and will continue this process until all JE fund monies at the time have been disbursed. The committee will follow compensation best practices to avoid problems such as inversion. The committee will report out to the provincial parties regularly during the term of the Framework Agreement. Should any concerns arise during the work of the committee they will be referred to the PLMC. Create a maintenance program to support ongoing implementation of the JE plan at a local, regional or provincial level. The maintenance program will include a process for addressing the wage rates of incumbents in positions which are impacted by implementation of the JE plan. The provincial parties confirm that $4,419,859 of ongoing annual funds will be used to implement the Job Evaluation Plan. Effective July 1, 2022, there will be a one-time pause of the annual $4,419,859 JE funding. This amount has been allocated to the local table bargaining money. The annual funding will recommence July 1, 2023.