JPC. If the JPC is unable to decide, by unanimous vote, on any matter within [***] Business Days after the matter is first raised with the JPC, then the matter will be referred to the Patent Officers for resolution. If such matter is not resolved by the Patent Officers of the Parties within [***] Business Days after the matter was referred to them, then, subject to Section 2.2(g), the applicable Prosecuting Party (as set forth in Article X) may decide the matter. Notwithstanding the foregoing, but subject to Section 2.2(g), if at any time the Party who has decision-making rights for such matter under Article X reasonably believes that the delay in decision resulting from such procedure will create a risk that any rights to Know-How or Patents will be lost or otherwise diminished, then such Party may exercise such decision-making rights immediately, provided that such resolving Party shall give due, good faith consideration to any comments or preferences expressed by the other Party with respect to such matter.
JPC. 1 Medical simulation & information sciences – Includes developing and enhancing military planning tools for DoD and other governmental activities (such as the Joint Medical Planning Tool for operational risk assessment in support of medical planners that uses data from the Expeditionary Medical Knowledge Warehouse, the Medical Planners Tool Kit, and the Enterprise Estimating Supplies Program).
JPC. 6 Combat casualty care – Includes damage control resuscitation, traumatic brain injury, combat trauma therapies, health monitoring & diagnostic technology, and combat dentistry.
JPC. If the JPC is unable to decide, by unanimous vote, on any matter within [**] Business Days after the matter is first raised with the JPC, then the matter will be referred to the Vice President of Intellectual Property, Chief Patent Counsel of Celgene and the Vice President of Legal of Agios (each, a “JPC Designee”) for resolution. If such matter is not resolved by such JPC Designees of the Parties within [**] Business Days after the matter was referred to them, then the JPC Designees shall submit such matter for attempted resolution by agreement of the Executive Officers. If the Executive Officers are unable to resolve any matter referred to them by the JPC Designees within [**] Business Days after the matter is referred to them, then, subject to Section 2.8(f), a Party may exercise its rights to decide the matter as provided in Article X. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if at any time the Party who has decision making rights for such matter under Article X reasonably believes that the delay in decision resulting from such procedure will create a risk that any rights to Know-How or Patent Rights will be lost or otherwise diminished, then such Party may exercise such decision making rights immediately, provided that such resolving Party shall give due consideration to any comments or preferences expressed by the other Party with respect to such matter.
JPC. Deadlocks in the JPC will be referred to the Executive Officers for final resolution, and if no agreement is reached by such executives within [***] of such deadlock being referred, then such deadlock shall be resolved consistent with [***], unless [***], in which case the provisions of Article VII and Article VIII shall determine which Party shall have control and the final decision-making authority with respect to matters related to the prosecution, maintenance, enforcement and defense of Patents. License Agreement_Nektar_Eli Lilly_July 2017 ***Text Omitted and Filed Separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Confidential Treatment Requested Under 17 C.F.R. Sections 200.80(b)(4) and 240.24b-2
JPC. Promptly after the Effective Date, the Parties will establish a joint patent committee, consisting of at least one (1) member from each of Idera and Vivelix (the “JPC”), to review and discuss the preparation, filing, prosecution, or maintenance of Licensed Patents. Prior to filing any documentation relating to the Licensed Patents with the PTO or submitting any correspondence relating to the Licensed Patents to the PTO, the acting Party will inform the JPC of such proposed filing or submission (which may be electronic) and, at the Parties’ discretion, discuss the foregoing in a meeting (which may be telephonic) of the JPC at the other Party’s request. Either Party may replace its respective JPC representatives at any time, with prior written notice to the other Party. The JPC will meet quarterly, or as more or less often as otherwise agreed by the Parties, by telephone or in person, as agreed by the Parties, at mutually convenient locations. For clarity, the JPC will have only the authority set forth above and in no event will it have the authority to amend, modify, or waive any term of this Agreement.
JPC. JPC was incorporated in Malaysia as a private limited company with its address at Xx. 0X-0 & 0X-0, Xxxxx Xxxxx Lama 28, 000, Xxxxx Xxxxx Xxxx, 00000 Xxxxx Xxxxxx.
JPC. The program counter for exiting needs no change, as σ.jpc already contains the instructions following the loop. Our implementation uses the loop counter to bound the number of iterations. This is not shown here. Clause (4): The clause for return statements is more complicated than the others, as it has to deal with two different skylines: the one from the function that is about to return, and the one from the caller. Let f be the name of the current function. To execute a return statement, the current skyline is first extended with F (l) to the location l of the return keyword. Then, the returned expression is evaluated. Next the skyline is extended with F (m), to the location m of the closing brace of the function body. Then, the program state from before the function call is restored, but updated with all the changes made by f . For this, the topmost element σc of the call stack is removed; this is the program state of the caller. A new state σjj is constructed, which the caller should use to resume execution; σjj has the caller’s original env , but with the #return register holding the return value. The program counter and call stack are restored to the ones from before the call. The caller’s skyline xx.xxx is extended with a forward line F (n) to the call site, and an edge E(p) to the power draw p. Finally, the skyline of the function call is recorded in the list of all skylines of f . This is done with the function registerSkyline, which stores the given skyline in the given state, and returns the thus updated state.
JPC. Each Party will discuss and attempt to resolve any potential or evolving disagreement related to the Research Program through its respective Project Co-Leaders before it is brought before the JPC. With respect to the responsibilities of the JPC, each Party shall [***] on all matters brought before the JPC. The JPC shall operate as to matters within its responsibility by unanimous Party Vote. If the JPC is unable to achieve unanimous Party Vote within [***] after the dispute matter is brought to vote before the JPC or such longer period as the Project Co-Leaders agree, such matter shall be referred to the JRC for resolution.
JPC
