Common use of Information Standards Clause in Contracts

Information Standards. ‌ 5.1.1 Shared information only has value if it is accurate and up-to-date. The Local Authorities and the Board each have a range of initiatives underway to check the quality and accuracy of the data which they hold, and particular emphasis is placed on checking the accuracy and quality of information to be shared externally. These include case recording audit and revision exercises, supervision of case management procedures and similar data quality exercises undertaken from time to time. 5.1.2 Similarly, information exchange can only work properly in practice if it is provided in a format which the Party receiving it can utilise. 5.1.3 In all cases of data exchange, local guidance documentation will examine the precise data sets and fields which require to be exchanged in order to achieve a particular objective. These will be subject to periodic review at a local level to ensure the continued relevance of all the information exchanged. 5.1.4 The quality of data is important whether in shared records or in records held by one Party only. The Parties will make arrangements for periodic sampling of records held to evaluate the accuracy and general quality of data held. 5.1.5 The Parties undertake to notify the other as soon as practicable if an error is discovered in information which has been provided to the other Parties, to ensure that the Parties are then able to correct their respective records. This will happen whether the error is discovered through existing data quality initiatives or is flagged up through some other route (such as the existence of errors being directly notified to one or other Parties by the data subjects themselves). 5.1.6 The parties undertake to have in place risk management and disaster recovery processes which protects the integrity of personal data held for the purposes of data sharing or held in any joint databases or held in a joint working environment. 5.1.7 Relevant managers within each organisation will have the responsibility to notify through their own organisation’s reporting procedures any significant failing in the systems that hold these data. The parties undertake to notify each other as soon as practicable if any such failing is identified and is likely to remain unresolved for significant period of time.

Information Standards. ‌ 5.1.1 Shared information only has value if it is accurate and up-to-date. The Local Authorities and the Board each have a range of initiatives underway to check the quality and accuracy of the data which they hold, and particular emphasis is placed on checking the accuracy and quality of information to be shared externally. These include case recording audit and revision exercises, supervision of case management procedures and similar data quality exercises undertaken from time to time. 5.1.2 Similarly, information exchange can only work properly in practice if it is provided in a format which the Party receiving it can utilise. 5.1.3 In all cases of data exchange, local guidance documentation will examine the precise data sets and fields which require to be exchanged in order to achieve a particular objective. These will be subject to periodic review at a local level to ensure the continued relevance of all the information exchanged. 5.1.4 The quality of data is important whether in shared records or in records held by one Party only. The Parties will make arrangements for periodic sampling of records held to evaluate the accuracy and general quality of data held. 5.1.5 The Parties undertake to notify the other as soon as practicable if an error is discovered in information which has been provided to the other Parties, to ensure that the Parties are then able to correct their respective records. This will happen whether the error is discovered through existing data quality initiatives or is flagged up through some other route (such as the existence of errors being directly notified to one or other Parties by the data subjects themselves). 5.1.6 The parties undertake to have in place risk management and disaster recovery processes which protects the integrity of personal data held for the purposes of data sharing or held in any joint databases or held in a joint working environment. 5.1.7 Relevant managers within each organisation will have the responsibility to notify through their own organisation’s reporting procedures any significant failing in the systems that hold these data. The parties undertake to notify each other as soon as practicable if any such failing is identified and is likely to remain unresolved for significant period of time.

Information Standards. ‌ 5.1.1 Shared information only has value if it is accurate and up-to-date. The Local Authorities and the Board each have a range of initiatives underway to check the quality and accuracy of the data which they hold, and particular emphasis is placed on checking the accuracy and quality of information to be shared externally. These include case recording audit and revision exercises, supervision of case management procedures and similar data quality exercises undertaken from time to time. 5.1.2 Similarly, information exchange can only work properly in practice if it is provided in a format which the Party receiving it can utilise. 5.1.3 In all cases of data exchange, local guidance documentation will examine the precise data sets and fields which require to be exchanged in order to achieve a particular objective. These will be subject to periodic review at a local level to ensure the continued relevance of all the information exchanged. 5.1.4 The quality of data is important whether in shared records or in records held by one Party only. The Parties will make arrangements for periodic sampling of records held to evaluate the accuracy and general quality of data held. 5.1.5 The Parties undertake to notify the other as soon as practicable if an error is discovered in information which has been provided to the other Parties, to ensure that the Parties are then able to correct their respective records. This will happen whether the error is discovered through existing data quality initiatives or is flagged up through some other route (such as the existence of errors being directly notified to one or other Parties by the data subjects themselves). 5.1.6 The parties undertake to have in place risk management and disaster recovery processes which protects the integrity of personal data held for the purposes of data sharing or held in any joint databases or held in a joint working environment. 5.1.7 Relevant managers within each organisation will have the responsibility to notify through their own organisation’s reporting procedures any significant failing in the systems that hold these data. The parties undertake to notify each other as soon as practicable if any such failing is identified and is likely to remain unresolved for significant period of time. 5.1.8 Each Party will manage the information exchanged in terms of this Protocol in line with its approved Records Management Plan in terms of the Public Records (Scotland) ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇.