In Guatemala. Cement II, the Panel found that the subject anti-dumping duty order of Guatemala was inconsistent with several articles of the Anti-Dumping Agreement, among them Article 5. The Panel then opined that Mexico's claims under other articles of the Anti-Dumping Agreement, among them Article 1, were "dependent claims, in the sense that they depend entirely on findings that Guatemala has violated other provisions of the AD Agreement."92 For this reason the Panel considered it not necessary to address these claims.
Appears in 1 contract
Samples: www.wto.org
In Guatemala. Cement II, the Panel found that the subject anti-dumping duty order of Guatemala was inconsistent with several articles of the Anti-Dumping Agreement, among them Article 5. The Panel then opined determined that Mexico's claims under other articles of the Anti-Dumping Agreement, among them Article 19, were "dependent claims, in the sense that they depend entirely on findings that Guatemala has violated other provisions of the AD Agreement."92 For "125 In light of this reason dependent nature of Mexico's claim, the Panel considered it not necessary to address these claims.
Appears in 1 contract
Samples: www.wto.org
In Guatemala. Cement II, the Panel found that the subject anti-dumping duty order of Guatemala was inconsistent with several articles of the Anti-Dumping Agreement, among them Article 5. The Panel then opined found that Mexico's claims under other articles of the Anti-Dumping Agreement, among them Article 118, were "dependent claims, in the sense that they depend entirely on findings that Guatemala has violated other provisions of the AD Agreement."92 For "95 In light of this reason dependent nature of Mexico's claim, the Panel considered it not necessary to address these claims.
Appears in 1 contract
Samples: www.wto.org
In Guatemala. Cement II, the Panel found that the subject anti-dumping duty order of Guatemala was inconsistent with several articles of the Anti-Dumping Agreement, among them Article 5. The Panel then opined determined that Mexico's claims under other articles of the Anti-Dumping Agreement, among them Article 19, were "dependent claims, in the sense that they depend entirely on findings that Guatemala has violated other provisions of the AD Agreement."92 For "93 In light of this reason dependent nature of Mexico's claim, the Panel considered it not necessary to address these claims.
Appears in 1 contract
Samples: www.wto.org