Hostage. The detention of an Insured Person by a third party who threatens to kill, injure or continue to detain an Insured Person in order to compel a state, international organisation or person to do or abstain from doing any act. Kidnap The seizing, detaining or carrying away by force or fraud of one or more Insured Persons (except a child by its parent or guardian) by a third party without the consent of an Insured Person and without lawful excuse. Kidnap for Xxxxxx Any event or connected series of events of seizing, detaining or carrying away by force or fraud of one or more Insured Persons (except a child by its parent or guardian) for the purpose of demanding cash, monetary instruments, bullion, or the fair market value of any securities, property or services. Xxxxxx Monies Cash, monetary instruments, bullion, or the fair market value of any securities, property or services. Exclusions applicable to Section B6 The Company will not be liable for any claim that is the result of: 1 The fraudulent, dishonest, or criminal acts of the Insured, or any person authorised by the Insured to have custody of Xxxxxx Xxxxxx. This exclusion will not apply to the payment of Xxxxxx Monies by the Insured in a situation where local authorities have declared such payment illegal.
Hostage. Hostage means your detention by a third party who threatens to kill, injure or continue to detain you in order to compel a state, international organisation or person (whether a legal person or a natural person) to do or abstain from doing any act.
Hostage. Although XxXxxx refused to reduce the sentences given to List and Xxxxxx, he reduced all of the other sentences on the ground that the ―other officers charged with excessive reprisals… had lesser responsibility or, in some cases, showed evidence of humane considerations.‖147 Both rationales were questionable. Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx received the most significant reduction, from 20 years to time served, despite Tribunal V‘s conclusion that he was responsible, as Military Governor of Greece, for more than 1,000 illegal executions148 – a stunning act of clemency that at least one commenter attributed not to ―lesser responsibility‖ or ―humane considerations,‖ but to the fact that Xxxxxxx was the brother of Xxxx Xxxxxxx, the Adenauer advisor who was then involved in negotiating German rearmament with the Allies.149 Xxxxx Xxxxxx also had his sentence reduced from seven years to time served, even though his soldiers had executed hundreds of civilians.150 Xxxxxx‘s sentence was already lenient, given the gravity of his crimes; a further reduction on the ground of ―lesser responsibility‖ was hardly warranted. Moreover, although there were, in fact, ―human considerations‖ justifying a lesser sentence – Xxxxxx had attempted to mitigate the harshness of some of the orders he received from his superiors – Tribunal V had already taken them into account.151 In fact, the Tribunal made clear that it had taken mitigating factors such as ―humane considerations‖ into account for all of the defendants.152 RuSHA. XxXxxx significantly reduced the sentences of all six petitioners, in three instances from 10 or 15 years to time served, based on ―the relatively restricted nature of the relationship of these defendants to the crimes, their relatively subordinate roles, and certain other extenuating circumstances.‖153 It is unfortunate that XxXxxx did not discuss his specific decisions, because it is difficult to see why – to take only one example – Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxx deserved to have his 15-year sentence reduced to time served. Tribunal I found that Xxxxxxxxx, who was the Chief of the VOMI department dedicated to ―Safeguarding German Folkdom in the Xxxxx,‖ had ―in the course of the immense VOMI operations bec[o]me deeply involved in measures carried out under the Germanization program,‖ including forced evacuation and resettlement, Germanization, and the use of slave labor.154 Einsatzgruppen. As noted above, XxXxxx commuted 10 of the 15 death sentences – four to life imprisonment, one to 25 yea...
Hostage. TACTICAL, SWAT TEAM PARTICIPATION Effective the pay period including July 1, 2023, all full-time unit employees designated as members of the City Hostage Negotiation, Tactical Response, or SWAT teams will receive an additional five percent (5%) of base pay while acting in this capacity for each hour actually worked, including training. • Hostage Negotiation • Tactical Response • SWAT (Special Weapons And Tactics) • Field Training Officer (Sergeants are not eligible). • Communications Training Officer Effective the pay period including July 1, 2024, in lieu of the five percent (5%) of base pay premium for each hour actually worked while acting in the capacity as a member of the Hostage Negotiation team, Tactical Response, or SWAT, employees designated as members to the SWAT or Hostage Negotiation team will receive two percent 2%) of base pay. This premium will be paid for all hours in paid status similar to other Special Assignment Pay premiums. The Parties agree that to the extent permitted by law the premium pays set forth above qualify as special compensation under Title 2 CCR 571 and Title 2 CCR 571.1. In the event that the City or the Association learn that any of the pay items listed above may or will not be recognized as special compensation, the parties will reopen negotiations on the narrow and specific issue of providing the compensation associated with those premiums in a manner that complies with CalPERS reporting requirements.
Hostage. The hostage under this Contract is the Standard Gold owned and pledged by the Pledgor according to the law, on the premise that the pledge rate of every and all the loan under the Main Contracts are not more than 70%, the quantity of gold that shall be pledged for every loan shall be confirmed based on the Gold Price of the Pledge Gold on previous transaction day of Pledge Day. The specific information is subject to the Hostage List which is the attachment of this Contract signed by both parities in written.
