GRADING STANDARDS Sample Clauses
The Grading Standards clause defines the quality and specifications required for materials, work, or services provided under a contract. It typically outlines the criteria or benchmarks that must be met, such as industry standards, specific grades, or performance levels, and may reference recognized grading systems or regulatory requirements. By establishing clear expectations for quality, this clause helps prevent disputes over whether deliverables meet contractual obligations and ensures consistency in the work or materials supplied.
GRADING STANDARDS. 15 16 Teachers are responsible for setting permissible standards for grading students, communicating those 17 standards, and fairly applying them. Such grades and/or comments will only be changed in accordance with 18 the law or District policy. Prior to making any decision which alters any grade or comment or making a 19 recommendation to alter a grade or comment, a building administrator/supervisor will study the records, 20 ascertain the factors involved, and consult with the employee who gave the grade. If a grade or comment is 21 altered by a District representative, the employee and parent/guardian of the impacted student shall be 22 notified in writing. (See WAC ▇▇▇-▇▇-▇▇▇ and RCW 28A.150.240)
GRADING STANDARDS. 28 29 Teachers are responsible for setting permissible standards for grading students, communicating those 30 standards, and fairly applying them. The use of standardized “pull down” comments shall be considered 31 sufficient and narrative comments shall not be required. Such grades and/or comments will only be changed 32 in accordance with the law or District policy. Prior to making any decision which alters any grade or comment 33 or making a recommendation to alter a grade or comment, a building administrator/supervisor will study the 34 records, ascertain the factors involved, and consult with the employee who gave the grade. If a grade or 35 comment is altered by a District representative, the employee and parent/guardian of the impacted student 36 shall be notified in writing, and a narrative comment will be noted on the report card indicating that the grade 37 or comment was provided by someone other than the employee. (See WAC ▇▇▇-▇▇-▇▇▇ and RCW 38 28A.04.120) 39 40 Grading Reporting 41 In order to provide sufficient time for employees to adequately prepare student progress and report cards, 42 the following parameters will be in place:
GRADING STANDARDS. The Association recognizes the District’s desire to align grading practices with the ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Instructional Framework. As this is a major shift from current practice, the Association and District will collaborate and mutually agree on the timeline for implementation and professional development needs of the staff to accomplish this change. This will be facilitated through a committee. This committee will be comprised of six (6) members. The Lead Bargainer from each team will appoint three (3) committee members.
GRADING STANDARDS. Teachers are responsible for setting permissible standards for grading students, communicating those standards and fairly applying them. Such grades will only be changed in accordance with the law or District policy. Prior to making any decision which alters any grade or makes a recommendation to alter a grade, a building administrator/supervisor will study the records, ascertain the factors involved and consult with the employee who gave the grade. If a grade is altered by a District representative, the employee shall be notified in writing. (See WAC ▇▇▇-▇▇-▇▇▇ and RCW 28A.150.240.)
GRADING STANDARDS. Teachers are responsible for setting permissible standards for grading students, communicating those standards, and fairly applying them. The use of standardized “pull down” comments shall be considered sufficient and narrative comments shall not be required. Such grades and/or comments will only be changed in accordance with the law or District policy. Prior to making any decision which alters any grade or comment or making a recommendation to alter a grade or comment, a building administrator/supervisor will study the records, ascertain the factors involved, and consult with the employee who gave the grade. If a grade or comment is altered by a District representative, the employee and parent/guardian of the impacted student shall be notified in writing, and a narrative comment will be noted on the report card indicating that the grade or comment was provided by someone other than the employee. (See WAC ▇▇▇-▇▇-▇▇▇ and RCW 28A.04.120) In order to provide sufficient time for employees to adequately prepare Interim Progress Reports (IPR) and report cards, required completion dates will be communicated in September. Administrators may review a sampling of employees’ report cards to ensure appropriate standards are graded and grading practices are calibrated. Administrators will discuss this expectation with impacted employees during the October goal setting conference, mid-year, and/or final evaluation conference, as applicable. The Administrator shall begin their sampling review no earlier six (6) days before grades are due. Employees who have provided report cards to the administrator as part of the sampling review shall be given three (3) days to make any requested changes.