Final Reporting. As-built data must be delivered at the completion of the project and should be accurate within reasonable parameters. Methods used for ensuring accuracy may include, but not be limited to digitizing GIS data to match statewide aerial imagery, which is map accurate at a 1:2400 or 1”=200’. Statewide aerial imagery is published through the state Geographic Information Council and located here: ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇/apps/mapviewer/index.html?layers=1a3f8aa93e674dcd93396b8d2c11e4 90 Imagery is on a planned update of once per year. Therefore, modifying planning-level data to conform to as-built data by mapping at a 1:2400 scale using statewide aerials is an acceptable approach for ensuring horizontal accuracy thresholds have been met in accordance with this data standard. Regardless of the approach, applicants must document their methods chosen in the metadata for a given data layer. Grantees will be required to produce a project closeout document that provides programmatic detail along with information around other contractual obligations outlined in Exhibit A of the grant agreement. Grantees must also provide a post-construction list of addresses to the SCBBO which shall include information on advertised speeds as well as speed and latency tests for those consumers that take service. Additional reporting may be required based on supplemental guidance from US Treasury under ARPA. The SCBBO shall provide templates for both project closeout as well as post construction reporting of speed and latency tests for consumers that subscribe to service. Speed and Latency Testing To ensure broadband infrastructure investments meet ARPA requirements to deliver service that reliably meets or exceeds symmetrical download and upload speeds of 100 Mbps, the SCBBO will accept reporting of speed and latency measurements using industry-recognized best practices when conducting speed tests to comply with post construction reporting requirements outlined in SCBBO administered ARPA grant programs. In addition to demonstrating speed requirements are met, network latency measurements during testing windows should fall at or below 100 milliseconds round-trip time. This approach ensures a connection that supports reasonably foreseeable real-time applications. Additional details are provided in the sections that follow. A* Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), NGCC, (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community Exhibit L Proposed Project Area Example for Illustrative Purposes Only Legend Unserved Home or Business A* Proposed Network Junction Proposed Fiber or Cable Line 2020 Census Block ISP Initial Here: Date: Map prepared by ORS on: <Date Goes Here> 2024 ARPA SLFRF 3.0 7,000 I Feet Data Source: <ISP Name Goes Here> 2020 Census Block Project Area Comporium, Inc. PA = PA N = N PS = PS ISP Initial Here: Date: GEOID20 Total Structures in Agreement Eligibility Project Number Project Name 450899705014026 11 PA CMP-32 Midlands 1
Appears in 1 contract
Sources: Grant Agreement
Final Reporting. As-built data must be delivered at the completion of the project and should be accurate within reasonable parameters. Methods used for ensuring accuracy may include, but not be limited to digitizing GIS data to match statewide aerial imagery, which is map accurate at a 1:2400 or 1”=200’. Statewide aerial imagery is published through the state Geographic Information Council and located here: ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇/apps/mapviewer/index.html?layers=1a3f8aa93e674dcd93396b8d2c11e4 90 Imagery is on a planned update of once per year. Therefore, modifying planning-level data to conform to as-built data by mapping at a 1:2400 scale using statewide aerials is an acceptable approach for ensuring horizontal accuracy thresholds have been met in accordance with this data standard. Regardless of the approach, applicants must document their methods chosen in the metadata for a given data layer. Grantees will be required to produce a project closeout document that provides programmatic detail along with information around other contractual obligations outlined in Exhibit A of the grant agreement. Grantees must also provide a post-construction list of addresses to the SCBBO which shall include information on advertised speeds as well as speed and latency tests for those consumers that take service. Additional reporting may be required based on supplemental guidance from US Treasury under ARPA. The SCBBO shall provide templates for both project closeout as well as post construction reporting of speed and latency tests for consumers that subscribe to service. Speed and Latency Testing To ensure broadband infrastructure investments meet ARPA requirements current and future cases and to deliver service that reliably meets or exceeds symmetrical download promote consistency across federal agencies, Treasury adopts the compliance standards and upload speeds of 100 Mbps, the SCBBO will accept reporting of testing protocols for speed and latency measurements using industryestablished and used by the Commission in multiple contexts, including the Connect America Fund and the Rural Digital Opportunity Fund.1 In order to demonstrate continued compliance with these standards, subgrantees must perform speed and latency tests from the customer premises of an active subscriber to a remote test server at an end- point consistent with the requirements for a Commission-recognized best practices when conducting speed tests to comply with post construction reporting requirements outlined in SCBBO administered ARPA grant programs. designated IXP.2 Draft In addition to demonstrating speed requirements are metaddition, network 95 percent of latency measurements during testing windows should must fall at or below 100 milliseconds round-trip time. time.3 This approach ensures a connection that supports reasonably foreseeable real-time applications. Additional details are provided In the limited circumstance where even a fiber deployment cannot achieve this latency threshold (for example in a remote territory), Treasury may expand the sections that followlatency threshold for specific broadband infrastructure investments at the request of a recipient. 1 See, e.g., Connect America Fund, WC Docket No. 10-90, Order, 33 FCC Rcd 6509 (WCB/WTB/OET 2018) (Performance Measures Order); Connect America Fund, Order on Reconsideration, WC Docket No. 10-90, 34 FCC Rcd 10109 (2019) (Performance Measures Reconsideration Order). 2 See Performance Measures Reconsideration Order, 34 FCC Rcd at 10114-16, paras. 17-19. 3 See id., 34 FCC Rcd at 6527-28, para. 50 A* Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), NGCC, (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community Exhibit L Proposed Project Area Example for Illustrative Purposes Only Legend Unserved Home or Business A* Proposed Network Junction Proposed Fiber or Cable Line 2020 Census Block ISP Initial Here: Date: Map prepared by ORS on: <Date Goes Here> 2024 2023 ARPA SLFRF 3.0 CPF 1.0 7,000 I Feet Data Source: <ISP Name Goes Here> Draft 2020 Census Block Project Area Comporium, Inc. <ISP Name Goes Here> PA = PA Priority Area N = N Unserved PS = PS Partially Served ISP Initial Here: Date: GEOID20 Percent Served Total Structures in Agreement Eligibility Project Number Project Name 450899705014026 11 PA CMP-32 Midlands 1450030218002137 1.00 5 Project Number Goes Here Project Name Goes Here 450030218002147 1.00 1 Project Number Goes Here Project Name Goes Here 450030218002144 1.00 9 Project Number Goes Here Project Name Goes Here 450030218002082 1.00 3 Project Number Goes Here Project Name Goes Here 450030218002146 1.00 0 Project Number Goes Here Project Name Goes Here
Appears in 1 contract
Sources: Grant Agreement