Final Performance Evaluation Clause Samples
Final Performance Evaluation. The process shall be as follows:
A. The ▇▇▇▇ or Director will hold an evaluation conference with the Faculty member to discuss the completed evaluation including identification of deficiencies and suggestions for improvement.
B. The Faculty member shall have ten (10) working days to review and respond in writing to any comments placed in the evaluation. At the end of this ten (10) working day period, the Faculty member shall sign his/her evaluation acknowledging that he/she has had the opportunity to discuss the evaluation with the evaluator and to respond to the materials presented and any appended comments.
C. The evaluation will then be submitted to the next ranking supervisor for review, comments and signature.
D. If the next ranking supervisor adds comments, the Faculty member shall have ten
Final Performance Evaluation. Recommendations for Final Performance 34 Evaluation ratings shall be made by no later than May 10. Recommendations may be 35 submitted earlier, provided the Immediate Supervisor has provided the employee 36 with their recommended reappointment status and allowed them the opportunity to 37 request a Post Evaluation Conference.
Final Performance Evaluation. Immediate Supervisors must acknowledge 17 the above procedures have been followed prior to submitting a 18 recommendation for a Final Performance Evaluation rating. Final Performance 19 Evaluation ratings will be a combination of the Manager’s Rating and the 20 Student Performance rating.
Final Performance Evaluation. Should the final performance Evaluation and Review determine that Contractor demonstrated a gross failure to meet the performance measures established hereunder, the Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Personnel and Administration (Executive Director), upon request by the CDLE, and showing of good cause, may debar Contractor and prohibit Contractor from bidding on future contracts. Contractor may contest the final Evaluation, Review and Rating by: (a) filing rebuttal statements, which may result in either removal or correction of the evaluation (CRS §24-105-102(6)), or (b) under CRS §24-105-102(6), exercising the debarment protest and appeal rights provided in CRS §§▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇, 107, 201 or 202, which may result in the reversal of the debarment and reinstatement of Contractor, by the Executive Director, upon showing of good cause.