Failure to File an Answer Sample Clauses

Failure to File an Answer. Failure at any step of this procedure to communicate the decision of a grievance within the specified time limits shall mean that the grievant may deem the grievance denied and may therefore appeal it to the next step (except as otherwise provided in this Article). Failure at any step of this procedure to appeal a grievance to the next step shall be deemed acceptance of the decision rendered at that step.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Failure to File an Answer

  • Failure to Vacate If the Resident does not vacate the Residence on the expiry or early termination of this Agreement, (i) the Resident is liable for any financial loss sustained or incurred by the Institution or the Manager, and (ii) the Manager may remove the property of the Resident from the Room (whether or not the Resident is present at the time), and place the property in temporary storage in a location in the Residence of the Manager’s choice, at the Resident’s expense, without notice to the Resident and without liability to the Manager for any damage to or loss of the Resident’s property.

  • Failure to Report No compensation shall be granted for the total period of standby if the employee is unable to report for duty when required.

  • Failure to Meet Timelines Failure by the Union to comply with the timelines will result in the automatic withdrawal of the grievance. Failure by the Employer to comply with the timelines will entitle the Union to move the grievance to the next step of the procedure.

  • Notification of Results Within 10 days after satisfactory inspection and/or testing of Interconnection Facilities built by the Interconnection Customer (including, if applicable, inspection and/or testing after correction of defects or failures), the Interconnected Transmission Owner shall confirm in writing to the Interconnection Customer and Transmission Provider that the successfully inspected and tested facilities are acceptable for energization.

  • Failure to Respond If you fail to respond by the date given above, your application will be refused under Section 3A(4)(a) of the Registered Designs Act 1949.

  • FAILURE TO MEET REPORTING OBLIGATIONS 14.1 Should the Licensee fail to furnish the Licence Parameter Return referred to in clause 13.1 above within the required time period, SAMRO will be entitled to invoice the Licensee based on the licence parameters upon which the preceding invoice was based.

  • Failure to Notify If Contractor fails to specify in writing any problem or circumstance that materially affects the costs of its delivery of services or products, including a material breach by the Department, about which Contractor knew or reasonably should have known with respect to the period during the term covered by Contractor's status report, Contractor shall not be entitled to rely upon such problem or circumstance as a purported justification for an increase in the price for the agreed upon scope.

  • Failure to Return Failure of the employee to return pursuant to the date determined in this Section will constitute grounds for termination by the School District unless the School District and the employee mutually agree to an extension of the leave.

  • Accurate and Timely Submission of Reports a) The reports and administrative fees shall be accurate and timely and submitted in accordance with the due dates specified in this section. Vendor shall correct any inaccurate reports or administrative fee payments within three (3) business days upon written notification by DIR. Vendor shall deliver any late reports or late administrative fee payments within three (3) business days upon written notification by DIR. If Vendor is unable to correct inaccurate reports or administrative fee payments or deliver late reports and fee payments within three

  • Examination of an application for an industrial design 1. A formal examination of the application for an industrial design received by the federal executive authority for intellectual property is carried out which includes checks on presence of the documents specified in clause 2 of Article 1377 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation and its compliance with the established requirements. If the result of the formal examination is positive, then a substantive examination of an application for an industrial design is carried out, which includes: information search in relation to the claimed industrial design to determine the publicly available information, which shall be taken into account when examining the design patentability; examination of the claimed industrial design for the compliance with the requirements under Article 1231.1, clause 4 of Article 1349 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, and the patentability criteria under the first paragraph of clause 1, clause 5 of Article 1352 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation; examination of the claimed industrial design for the compliance with the patentability criteria under the second paragraph of clause 1 of Article 1352 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. An information search in relation to the objects specified in sub-clause 4 of clause 4 of Article 1349 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation shall not be carried out, and the federal executive authority on intellectual property notifies the applicant about it. 2. If, as a result of the substantive examination of an application for an industrial design, it is found that the claimed industrial design represented on the reproductions of an external appearance of the article does not relate to the objects specified in Article 1231.1 or clause 4 of Article 1349 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation and meets the patentability criteria under Article 1352 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, the federal executive authority for intellectual property makes a decision to grant a patent for an industrial design. The date of filing of the application for the industrial design and the priority date of the industrial design shall be specified in the decision. If, during the process of substantive examination of an application for an industrial design, it is found that the claimed object does not meet at least one of the requirements or patentability criteria specified in paragraph one of this clause, the federal executive authority for intellectual property makes a decision to refuse the issuance of a patent.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.