Common use of EVALUATION AND SELECTION PROCESS Clause in Contracts

EVALUATION AND SELECTION PROCESS. Evaluation will consist of the review and assessment of the Respondents‘ submittals. Top-scoring Respondents will be invited to participate in Stage 2 of the evaluation process, which will be a formal presentation to the evaluation committee. (See Section 3.16) All areas of evaluation listed in the table below are to be addressed by the Respondent in its submittal. Proposals that are substantially incomplete or lack key information may be rejected as non- responsive. Responses should be concise, summarizing the Respondent‘s pertinent experience and capabilities. Emphasis should be placed on completeness and clarity. Responses that do not provide sufficient content or satisfactory information, as requested in this RFP document, may receive lower scores. Points will be assigned to all categories (see table below for point-allocation per category) and then totaled in order to determine each Respondent‘s ranking: Vendor Responsiveness Pass/Fail Vendor Responsibility Pass/Fail Section 2 PUR 1001 Agree/Disagree Section 3 – Financials 24 Section 4 – PUR 1000 Agree/Disagree Section 5 – References, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Orders, & Environmental 49 Section 6 – Technical Specifications 145 Section 7 – Pricing Models and discounts proposed 260 Section 7 – Vendor Responsibility Questionnaire Pass/Fail Questions to Vendors 320 Except for Cost Information, all evaluation categories will be scored with each response having the opportunity to achieve the maximum total point allocation indicated.

EVALUATION AND SELECTION PROCESS. Evaluation will consist of the review and assessment of the Respondents‘ submittals. Top-scoring Respondents will be invited to participate in Stage 2 of the evaluation process, which will be a formal presentation to the evaluation committee. (See Section 3.16) All areas of evaluation listed in the table below are to be addressed by the Respondent in its submittal. Proposals that are substantially incomplete or lack key information may be rejected as non- responsive. Responses should be concise, summarizing the Respondent‘s pertinent experience and capabilities. Emphasis should be placed on completeness and clarity. Responses that do not provide sufficient content or satisfactory information, as requested in this RFP document, may receive lower scores. Points will be assigned to all categories (see table below for point-allocation per category) and then totaled in order to determine each Respondent‘s ranking: Vendor Responsiveness Pass/Fail Vendor Responsibility Pass/Fail Section 2 PUR 1001 Agree▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇/Disagree ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Section 3 – Financials 24 Section 4 – PUR 1000 Agree/Disagree Section 5 – References, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Purchase Orders, & Environmental 49 Section 6 – Technical Specifications 145 Section 7 – Pricing Models and discounts proposed 260 Section 7 – Vendor Responsibility Questionnaire Pass/Fail Questions to Vendors 320 Except for Cost Information, all evaluation categories will be scored with each response having the opportunity to achieve the maximum total point allocation indicated.