Ethics Issues Sample Clauses

Ethics Issues. All human research currently performed by our research groups has been reviewed by the respective ethical committees. By default, all data collection proposed in WPS1-3 (research WPs) will be performed at Xxxxxxx University (UPJS) which has a currently approved research protocol for behavioural data collection as well as for EEG imaging studies (see copies of approvals below). The raw subject data will be analysed only at Xxxxxxx University. Only summary data plots from which no individual data can be extracted will be used for consultations and collaboration on the research with the partners. If a decision is made in the future that additional data collection needs to happen at one of the other institutions, or if additional research would be planned, not covered by the currently approved protocol, the experiments will be performed only upon approval of the procedures and the informed consent forms by the Ethical Committee / Institutional Review Board of the Xxxxxxx University, Austrian Academy of Science, University of California at Riverside, Boston University, Massachusetts General Hospital or Oregon Health and Science University. Again, such data will then not travel between countries in any raw form, as only summary statistics and plots will be shared with the other collaborators for the collaboration purposes. For illustration purposes, the currently approved research protocol documents (ethical committee approvals, informed consent forms, subject recruitment flyers) from UCR, OHSU (via Portland VA) and BU are uploaded in SyGMa. Also, if any raw data are to be exchanged among the collaborating institutions, a data sharing agreement between the organizations will be prepared to assure that national and international data and personal privacy protection standards are implemented (a sample currently existing data sharing agreement between UPJS and MGH is uploaded in SyGMa). The work proposed in WP4 (brain training game) within this grant does not involve human subjects, as the only activity proposed here is software development for one of the components of the brain training game that OHSU and UCR are developing independently, and so no human subject testing will be performed within this grant. Details on the procedures and criteria that will be used to identify/recruit research participants Our subjects will be adult listeners capable of giving informed consent. The project plan does not require to work with children or vulnerable adults. Both genders...
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Ethics Issues. The activities of the proposal PACE-Net Plus are not directly related to any ethical issues. The project will implement a follow-up of the activities to ensure that European guidelines with regards to ethical issues are entirely respected ETHICS ISSUES TABLE: (Note: Research involving activities marked with an asterisk * in the left column in the table below will be referred automatically to Ethics Review.) Research on Human Embryo/ Foetus YES Page * Does the proposed research involve human Embryos? * Does the proposed research involve human Foetal Tissues/ Cells? * Does the proposed research involve human Embryonic Stem Cells (hESCs)? * Does the proposed research on human Embryonic Stem Cells involve cells in culture? * Does the proposed research on Human Embryonic Stem Cells involve the derivation of cells from Embryos? I CONFIRM THAT NONE OF THE ABOVE ISSUES APPLY TO MY PROPOSAL Yes Research on Humans YES Page * Does the proposed research involve children? * Does the proposed research involve patients? * Does the proposed research involve persons not able to give consent?
Sample 1
Ethics Issues. The NewProt project positively contributes to a series of ethically desirable topics. The use of (bio)informatics in the design of mutation experiments will reduce the number of experiments needed to achieve the scientific goals. This obviously contributes to the European competitiveness, in the context of ethical considerations it must be noted that a reduction in the number of experiments will also lead to reduces environmental stress, and in some cases also to a reduction in the use of test animals. The experimental partners (EMAUG, ENZYM, INGEN) use only genetically engineered microorganisms such as yeast or bacteria at the S1 level (GRAS status, risk group 1). The laboratories used fulfil the national requirements for experimental work at the S1 level. Hence, all work carried out under NewProt will be free of any ethical issues.
Sample 1

Related to Ethics Issues

  • ETHICS IN PUBLIC CONTRACTING This Contract incorporates by reference Article 9 of the Arlington County Purchasing Resolution, as well as all state and federal laws related to ethics, conflicts of interest or bribery, including the State and Local Government Conflict of Interests Act (Code of Virginia § 2.2-3100 et seq.), the Virginia Governmental Frauds Act (Code of Virginia § 18.2-498.1 et seq.) and Articles 2 and 3 of Chapter 10 of Title 18.2 of the Code of Virginia, as amended (§ 18.2-438 et seq.). The Contractor certifies that its proposal was made without collusion or fraud; that it has not offered or received any kickbacks or inducements from any other offeror, supplier, manufacturer or subcontractor; and that it has not conferred on any public employee having official responsibility for this procurement any payment, loan, subscription, advance, deposit of money, services or anything of more than nominal value, present or promised, unless consideration of substantially equal or greater value was exchanged.

  • Ethics No officer, agent or employee of the Board is or shall be employed by Provider or has or shall have a financial interest, directly or indirectly, in this Agreement or the compensation to be paid hereunder except as may be permitted in writing by the Board’s Code of Ethics, adopted May 25, 2011 (11-0525-PO2), as amended from time to time, which policy is hereby incorporated by reference into and made part of this Agreement as if fully set forth herein.

  • Contractor Standards Contractor shall comply with Contractor Standards provisions codified in the SDMC. Contractor understands and agrees that violation of Contractor Standards may be considered a material breach of the Contract and may result in Contract termination, debarment, and other sanctions.

  • ETHICS COMPLIANCE All Bidders/Contractors and their employees must comply with the requirements of Sections 73 and 74 of the Public Officers Law, other State codes, rules, regulations and executive orders establishing ethical standards for the conduct of business with New York State. In signing the Bid, Bidder certifies full compliance with those provisions for any present or future dealings, transactions, sales, contracts, services, offers, relationships, etc., involving New York State and/or its employees. Failure to comply with those provisions may result in disqualification from the Bidding process, termination of contract, and/or other civil or criminal proceedings as required by law.

  • Data Practices The Public Entity agrees with respect to any data that it possesses regarding the G.O. Grant, the Project, or the operation of the Real Property and, if applicable, Facility, to comply with all of the provisions and restrictions contained in the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act contained in Chapter 13 of the Minnesota Statutes that exists as of the date of this Agreement and as such may subsequently be amended, modified or replaced from time to time.

  • Health and Safety Committees A. The parties agree that Joint Union/Management Health and Safety Committees are appropriate. At the Union's request, each department shall establish at least one Joint Union/Management Health and Safety Committee.

  • Compliance with Executive Orders Concerning Ethics The Contractor warrants that he and his firm have complied in all respects with the Governor’s Executive Orders concerning ethics matters, including, but not limited to, Executive Order dated January 13, 2003 (establishing Code of Ethics for Executive Branch Officers and Employees, including provisions governing former officers and employees); Executive Order dated October 1, 2003 (governing vendors to state agencies and disclosure and registration of lobbyists); and O.C.G.A. Sections 21-5-70(5), 21-5-71 and 21-5-73, all as amended effective January 9, 2006 (requiring registration and disclosure filings by state agency vendor lobbyists). In this regard, the Contractor certifies that any lobbyist employed or retained by the Contractor or his firm has both registered and made the required disclosures required by the Executive Orders, as amended.

  • CFR PART 200 Domestic Preferences for Procurements As appropriate and to the extent consistent with law, the non-Federal entity should, to the greatest extent practicable under a Federal award, provide a preference for the purchase, acquisition, or use of goods, products, or materials produced in the United States (including but not limited to iron, aluminum, steel, cement, and other manufactured products). The requirements of this section must be included in all subawards including all contracts and purchase orders for work or products under this award. For purposes of 2 CFR Part 200.322, “Produced in the United States” means, for iron and steel products, that all manufacturing processes, from the initial melting stag through the application of coatings, occurred in the United States. Moreover, for purposes of 2 CFR Part 200.322, “Manufactured products” means items and construction materials composed in whole or in part of non-ferrous metals such as aluminum, plastics and polymer-based products such as polyvinyl chloride pipe, aggregates such as concrete, class, including optical fiber, and lumber. Pursuant to the above, when federal funds are expended by ESC Region 8 and TIPS Members, Vendor certifies that to the greatest extent practicable Vendor will provide a preference for the purchase, acquisition, or use of goods, products, or materials produced in the United States (including but not limited to iron, aluminum, steel, cement, and other manufactured products). Does vendor agree? Yes

  • Public Procurement 1. The Parties consider the liberalization of their respective public procurement markets as an objective of this Agreement.

  • CFR PART 200 Procurement of Recovered Materials A non-Federal entity that is a state agency or agency of a political subdivision of a state and its contractors must comply with section 6002 of the Solid Waste Disposal Act, as amended by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act. The requirements of Section 6002 include procuring only items designated in guidelines of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) at 40 CFR part 247 that contain the highest percentage of recovered materials practicable, consistent with maintaining a satisfactory level of competition, where the purchase price of the item exceeds $10,000 or the value of the quantity acquired during the preceding fiscal year exceeded $10,000; procuring solid waste management services in a manner that maximizes energy and resource recovery; and establishing an affirmative procurement program for procurement of recovered materials identified in the EPA guidelines. Does vendor certify that it is in compliance with the Solid Waste Disposal Act as described above? Yes

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.