Common use of Continuance of Hearing Clause in Contracts

Continuance of Hearing. The Court may continue the Fairness Hearing in its discretion without direct notice to the Settlement Class, other than by notice to Class Counsel and Defense Counsel, and any Class Member wishing to appear should check the Court’s docket or call the Clerk’s office three (3) calendar days before the scheduled date of the Fairness Hearing. SO ORDERED: DATED: , 201 XXX. XXXXXXXXX X. GORTON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS XXXXX X. XXXXXX, et al., Plaintiffs, v. MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, et al., Defendants. No. 16-cv-11620-NMG NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FAIRNESS HEARING Your legal rights might be affected if you are a member of the following class: All persons who participated in the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Supplemental 401(k) Plan at any time during the Class Period, including any Beneficiary of a deceased person who participated in the Plan at any time during the Class Period, and any Alternate Payee of a person subject to a Qualified Domestic Relations Order who participated in the Plan at any time during the Class Period. The Class Period is defined as August 9, 2010 through , 2019. For purposes of this Notice, if not defined herein, capitalized terms have the definitions in the Settlement Agreement, which is incorporated herein by reference.

Appears in 2 contracts

Samples: Class Action Settlement Agreement, Class Action Settlement Agreement

AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Continuance of Hearing. The Court may continue the Fairness Hearing in its discretion without direct notice to the Settlement Class, other than by notice to Class Counsel and Defense Counsel, and any Class Member wishing to appear should check the Court’s docket or call the Clerk’s office three (3) calendar days before the scheduled date of the Fairness Hearing. IT IS SO ORDERED: . DATED: , 201 2020 XXX. XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXX X. GORTON PANNELL, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION XXXXXX XXXXXXXXX et al., x. XXXXX X. XXXXXX, UNIVERSITY et al., Plaintiffs, v. MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 16-cv-116202920-NMG CAP Defendants. NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FAIRNESS HEARING Your legal rights might be affected if you are a member of the following class: All persons who participated in the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Supplemental 401(kEmory University Retirement Plan and the Emory Healthcare, Inc. Retirement Savings and Matching Plan (the “Plans”) Plan at any time during the Class Period, including any Beneficiary of a deceased person who participated in one or more of the Plan Plans at any time during the Class Period, and any Alternate Payee of a person subject to a Qualified Domestic Relations Order who participated in one or more of the Plan at any time during the Class Period. The Class Period is defined as August 911, 2010 through , 2019. For purposes of this Notice, if not defined herein, capitalized terms have the definitions in the Settlement Agreement, which is incorporated herein by reference.

Appears in 2 contracts

Samples: Class Action Settlement Agreement, Class Action Settlement Agreement

AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Continuance of Hearing. The Court may continue the Fairness Hearing in its discretion without direct notice to the Settlement Class, other than by notice to Class Counsel and Defense Counsel, and any Class Member wishing to appear should check the Court’s docket or call the Clerk’s office three (3) calendar days before the scheduled date of the Fairness Hearing. SO ORDERED: DATED: , 201 2020 XXX. XXXXXXXXX XXXXXX X. GORTON UNITED STATES DISTRICT ABRAMS JUDGE IN THE UNITED STATES OF DISTRICT COURT FOR THE STATE OF MINNESOTA DISTRICT COURT COUNTY OF MASSACHUSETTS HENNEPIN FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT CASE TYPE: Civil Other/Miscellaneous PASTOR XXXXX X. XXXXX, XXXXXXXX XXXXXX, et al.XXXX XXXX, AND XXXXXX XXXX, individually and as representatives of a class of similarly situated persons on behalf of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America Retirement Plan and the ELCA Retirement Plan for the Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Society, Plaintiffs, v. MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, et al., Defendants. Court File No. 1627-cv-11620CV-15-NMG 3425 Judge Xxxxxx X. Xxxxxx NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FAIRNESS HEARING BOARD OF PENSIONS OF THE EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH IN AMERICA (D/B/A PORTICO BENEFIT SERVICES), A MINNESOTA CORPORATION. Defendant. Your legal rights might be affected if you are a member of the following class: All persons who participated in the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Supplemental 401(kEvangelical Lutheran Church in America Retirement Plan (“ELCA Plan”) and the ELCA Retirement Plan for the Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Society (“Good Samaritan Plan”) (collectively referred to as the “Plan”) at any time during the Class Period, including any Beneficiary of a deceased person who participated in the Plan at any time during the Class Period, and any Alternate Payee of a person subject to a Qualified Domestic Relations Order who participated in the Plan at any time during the Class Period. The Class Period is defined as August 9March 1, 2010 2009 through September 30, 2019. For purposes of this Notice, if not defined herein, capitalized terms have the definitions in the Settlement Agreement, which is incorporated herein by reference.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Class Action Settlement Agreement

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.