Conclusions. 1. There is no basis for finding that the amendment to the previously approved agreement discriminates against any telecommunications carrier not a party to the agreement.
Appears in 10 contracts
Samples: Disposition: Agreement, apps.puc.state.or.us, apps.puc.state.or.us
Conclusions. 1. There is no basis for finding that the amendment amendments to the previously approved agreement discriminates discriminate against any telecommunications carrier not a party to the agreement.
Appears in 3 contracts
Samples: apps.puc.state.or.us, apps.puc.state.or.us, apps.puc.state.or.us
Conclusions. 1. There is no basis for finding that the amendment to the previously approved acknowledged agreement discriminates against any telecommunications carrier not a party to the agreement.
Appears in 2 contracts
Samples: apps.puc.state.or.us, apps.puc.state.or.us
Conclusions. 1. There is no basis for finding that the amendment supplemental agreement to the previously approved agreement discriminates against any telecommunications carrier not a party to the agreement.
Appears in 1 contract
Samples: Supplemental Agreement
