Comprehensive Evaluation Summative Score Clause Samples
The Comprehensive Evaluation Summative Score clause establishes a method for aggregating various assessment components into a single, overall score. Typically, this clause outlines how individual evaluation criteria—such as performance metrics, project milestones, or compliance checks—are weighted and combined to produce a final, summative result. By providing a clear framework for scoring, it ensures transparency and consistency in evaluations, helping to objectively determine whether contractual obligations or performance standards have been met.
Comprehensive Evaluation Summative Score. A classroom teacher shall receive a summative performance rating for each of the eight (8) state evaluation criteria. Each teacher’s criterion scores are established using at least 50% of the components from each criterion and 100% of the student growth components as per RCW 28A.405.100, WAC 392-191A-080 and WAC 392-191A-090. The Summative Criteria Score is the sum of the eight criterion scores and is rated based on the summative scoring band, as follow: ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇ – Unsatisfactory = 8-14 Level 2 – Basic = 15-21 Level 3 – Proficient = 22-28 Level 4 – Distinguished = 29-32
Comprehensive Evaluation Summative Score. 49.9.1 For TPEP evaluations, employees shall receive a summative performance rating for each of the eight (8) state evaluation criteria. Each employee’s criterion scores are established using at least 50% of the components from each criterion and 100% of the student growth components. The Summative Criteria Score is the sum of the eight (8) criterion scores and is rated based on the summative scoring band, as follows. Unsatisfactory = 8-14 Basic = 15-22 Proficient = 22-28 Distinguished = 29-32
49.9.2 For non-TPEP evaluations, criterion-level scores shall be determined based upon a preponderance of evidence of each of the components which comprise the criterion. This evidence will include the growth of the classroom teacher over time and the conditions of the classroom teacher’s work assignment. In the event that the preponderance of evidence leads to an evaluative determination that is evenly split between two criterion scores or the evidence is ambiguous, the higher of the two criterion scores shall be given and used in the summative performance rating. The final summative rating options are unsatisfactory, basic, proficient, or distinguished.
Comprehensive Evaluation Summative Score a. A teacher shall receive a summative performance rating for each of the eight (8) state evaluation criteria. Each teacher’s criterion scores are established using at least 50% of the components from each criterion and 100% of the student growth components. The Summative Criteria Score is the sum of the eight (8) criterion scores and is rated based on the summative scoring band, as follows.
i. Unsatisfactory = 8-14 ii. Basic = 15-21 iii. Proficient = 22-28 iv. Distinguished = 29-32
b. An annual evaluation conference shall be no later than June 1 of the school year in which the evaluation takes place unless mutually agreed upon between evaluator and employee. At the conference, each criterion to be scored shall be rated using a preponderance of the evidence and based on an assessment of the teacher’s performance.
i. The teacher will sign two (2) copies of the Final Summative Evaluation Report.
ii. Signatures of the teacher required for the evaluation do not express agreement but merely receipt of that information.
iii. Within ten (10) calendar days of receipt of the Summative Evaluation Rating, the teacher may submit signed comments that shall be attached to the report in the teacher’s District personnel file.
iv. If there is a dispute between the evaluator and the employee regarding the rating, the parties shall have an opportunity to submit additional evidence within five (5) school days. The final decision is the responsibility of the evaluator.
c. Any non-provisional teacher who has not been on comprehensive prior to the 2016-17 school year during our four (4) year roll out, will have his/her criteria rating determined using the “soft landing” first time model listed in our Evaluation Guide. Starting in the 2017-18 school year, all comprehensive scores will be the “ongoing” rating scale in the Evaluation Guide.
Comprehensive Evaluation Summative Score. A classroom teacher shall receive a summative performance rating for each of the eight (8) state evaluation criteria. Each teacher’s criterion scores are established using at least 50% of the components from each criterion and 100% of the student growth components as per RCW 28A.405.100, WAC 392-191A-080 and WAC 392-191A-090. The Summative Criteria Score is the sum of the eight criterion scores and is rated based on the summative scoring band, as follow: ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇ – Unsatisfactory = 8-14 Level 2 – Basic = 15-21 Level 3 – Proficient = 22-28 Level 4 – Distinguished = 29-32 8. Student Growth Impact Rating Embedded in the instructional framework are five (5) components designated as student growth components. These components are embedded in criteria as SG 3.1, SG 3.2, SG 6.1, SG 6.2, and SG 8.1. Evaluators add up the raw score on these components and the teacher is given a score of low, average, or high based on the scores below. Upon completion of the overall summative scoring process, the evaluator will combine only the student growth rubric scores to assess the classroom teacher’s student growth impact rating. The following scoring band will be used to determine the student growth impact rating. 5-12 13-17 18-20 Low Average High
Comprehensive Evaluation Summative Score. A classroom teacher shall receive a summative performance rating for each of the eight
Comprehensive Evaluation Summative Score. A classroom teacher shall receive a summative performance rating for each of the eight (8) state evaluation criteria. Each criterion shall be rated based on the components in that criterion using the evidence gathered by the evaluator and employee. If there is a dispute between the evaluator and the employee regarding the rating, the parties shall have an opportunity to submit additional evidence. The final decision is the responsibility of the evaluator. The Summative Criteria Score is the sum of the eight criterion scores and is rated based on the summative scoring band, as follows: ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ = ▇ - ▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ Two Basic = 15 - 21 Level Three Proficient = 22 – 28 Level Four Distinguished = 29 – 32
Comprehensive Evaluation Summative Score. A classroom teacher shall receive a summative performance rating for each of the eight (8) state evaluation criteria. Each criterion shall be rated collaboratively based on the components in that criterion using a preponderance of the evidence. This analysis will be based on a holistic assessment of the teacher’s performance. If there is a dispute between the evaluator and the employee regarding the rating, the parties shall have an opportunity to submit additional evidence. The final decision is the responsibility of the evaluator. The Summative Criteria Score is the sum of the eight criterion scores and is rated based on the summative scoring band, as follows: Unsatisfactory = 8 – 14 Basic = 15 – 21 Proficient = 22 – 28 Distinguished = 29 – 32 3564 3565 3566 3567 3568 3569 3570 3571 3572 3573 3574 3575 3576 3577 3578 3579 3580 3581 3582 3583 3584 3585 3586 3587 3588 3589 3590 3591 3592 3593 3594 3595 3596 3597 3598 3599 3600 3601 3602 3603 3604
Comprehensive Evaluation Summative Score. A classroom teacher shall receive a summative performance rating for each of the eight (8) state evaluation criteria. Each teacher’s criterion scores are established using at least 50% of the components, with at least one elemental score for that component, from each criterion and 100% of the student growth components. The Summative Criteria Score is the sum of the eight criterion scores and is rated based on the summative scoring band, as follows: Unsatisfactory = 8 – 14 Basic = 15 – 21 Proficient = 22 – 28 Distinguished = 29 – 32 Component scores within a criterion will be averaged and rounded to reach a final criterion score.