Common use of Comprehensive Evaluation Summative Score Clause in Contracts

Comprehensive Evaluation Summative Score. A classroom teacher shall receive a summative performance rating for each of the eight (8) state evaluation criteria. Each teacher’s criterion scores are established using at least 50% of the components from each criterion and 100% of the student growth components as per RCW 28A.405.100, WAC 392-191A-080 and WAC 392-191A-090. The Summative Criteria Score is the sum of the eight criterion scores and is rated based on the summative scoring band, as follow: ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇ – Unsatisfactory = 8-14 Level 2 – Basic = 15-21 Level 3 – Proficient = 22-28 Level 4 – Distinguished = 29-32 8. Student Growth Impact Rating Embedded in the instructional framework are five (5) components designated as student growth components. These components are embedded in criteria as SG 3.1, SG 3.2, SG 6.1, SG 6.2, and SG 8.1. Evaluators add up the raw score on these components and the teacher is given a score of low, average, or high based on the scores below. Upon completion of the overall summative scoring process, the evaluator will combine only the student growth rubric scores to assess the classroom teacher’s student growth impact rating. The following scoring band will be used to determine the student growth impact rating. 5-12 13-17 18-20 Low Average High

Comprehensive Evaluation Summative Score. A classroom teacher shall receive a summative performance rating for each of the ofthe eight (8) state evaluation criteria. Each teacher’s criterion scores are established shall be rated based on the components in that criterion using at least 50% the evidence gathered by the evaluator and employee. If there is a dispute between the evaluator and the employee regarding the rating, the parties shall have an opportunity to submit additional evidence. The final decision is the responsibility of the components from each criterion and 100% of the student growth components as per RCW 28A.405.100, WAC 392-191A-080 and WAC 392-191A-090evaluator. The Summative Criteria Score is the sum of the eight criterion scores and is rated based on the summative scoring band, as followfollows: ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇ – Level One Unsatisfactory Two Basic Level Three Proficient Level Four Distinguished = 8-8 - 14 Level 2 – Basic = 15-15 - 21 Level 3 – Proficient = 22-28 Level 4 – Distinguished = 29-32 8. Student Growth Impact Rating Embedded in the instructional framework are five (5) components designated as student growth components. These components are embedded in criteria as SG 3.1, SG 3.2, SG 6.1, SG 6.2, and SG 8.1. Evaluators add up the raw score on these components and the teacher employee is given a score of low, average, or high based on the scores below. Upon completion of the ofthe overall summative scoring process, the evaluator will combine only the student growth rubric scores to assess the classroom teacher’s 's student growth impact rating. The following scoring band will be used to determine the student growth impact rating. 5-12 13-17 18-20 Low Average High