COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE Sample Clauses

COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE. Currently, the closest specialized pizza restaurant is one mile away from our intended location in the Local Bay area. ABC Ltd. will offer a better product, at a reasonable price, and will deliver it hot or refrigerated, always on time, to the customer's door. However, there are five fast-food restaurants, near our intended location, that also include pizza among other menu items. The quality of their products is no match for the New-York style pizza that we offer, but we may consider them as competitors because they offer better prices (for lower quality) and they are located within a one-mile radius from our pizzeria. Other main competitors that we have identified in Local Bay area are: Pizza Concepts. Pizza-For-You, and Xxxxxxxxx'x Foods. According to our own market survey (see Appendix M), we distinguish ourselves from them by providing better quality pizza at reasonable prices, and delivering both hot and special-package refrigerated pizza to the customer door. Other differences are included in the next table. Competitors We have, they don't They have, we don't Pizza Concepts better quality, specialized products, better equipment lower prices, table service, various other food items Pizza-For You better location, better quality, faster service lower prices, own delivery vehicles, traditional customers Xxxxxxxxx'x Foods skilled pizza staff, better recipes, lower prices luxury environment, highend customers, music and color lighting Other
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE. In addition to us, the Czech Republic currently has two other licensed mobile operators holding a total of six licenses: (1) Eurotel, a digital GSM 900/1800 MHz mobile telephone protocol and NMT (NMT450) operator and a holder of a UMTS license; and (2) Radiomobil, another digital GSM 900/1800 MHz operator, holder of a UMTS license and a license for 872 MHz frequency band. Eurotel acquired its NMT 450 license in November 1990 and launched commercial analog service operations in September 1991. The entry of GSM services reversed Eurotel's earlier NMT subscriber growth. Eurotel won its 900 XXx XXX license in March 1996 and launched commercial operations in July 1996. Eurotel Praha was allocated 1800 MHz frequencies in July 2001. Český Telecom, the national fixed line operator, became the sole shareholder of Eurotel in November 2003. In December 2004, the government initiated the sale process of its 51% stake in Český Telecom, the first attempt to do so since 2002, when a planned sale to Deutsche Bank and TDC failed. On April 12, 2005 the government signed the sale contract with Telefonica SA, the Spanish incumbent, which submitted the highest bid of CZK 82.6 billion for the controlling stake. Radiomobil acquired its 900 MHz license in March 1996 and began providing commercial service under the brand name Paegas in September 1996. Radiomobil was allocated 1800 MHz frequencies in July 2001. Radiomobil's majority shareholder is Deutsche Telekom AG. In April 2002 Radiomobil rebranded its services to the T-Mobile brand name, and has since changed its name to T-Mobile Czech Republic. On March 21, 2005 T-Mobile won the tender granting the frequencies in the 872 MHz band. T-Mobile and Eurotel were granted UMTS licenses in December 2001 for approximately CZK3.8 billion and CZK3.5 billion respectively. The recipients were required to pay CZK1 billion upon the issuance of the licenses and the balance of the purchase price in 2004. The operators were also required, as a unique deployment condition, to achieve 90% coverage of Prague, with their commercial UMTS services by January 1, 2007. The following table presents a summary of the relevant information for each wireless operator in the Czech Republic including estimated market share based on publicly released data of the operators as of December 31, 2004: Operator Brand Name Technology License Award Start of Market Share operations Eurotel Eurotel/ Go NMT/CDMA November 1990 July 1996 42.6% 450 GSM 900/1800 March 1996 - ...
COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE. Primary competitors and/or industries being altered by GIPLs products are described below: Pricing: Breath analytics equipment prices have been too high a cost to justify a large number of the 30,000 veterinary practices to spend several hundreds of thousands of dollars needed for equipment. Our goal is to bring the price point to less than $25,000. Key Weakness Many medical people have expressed an opinion, that in spite of the difficulties of utilizing new equipment, it is inevitable that a user-friendly technology will arrive that eliminates most of their outsourcing of testing. It is our goal to initiate a conservative transition phase embracing our new technology. We believe there are differentiating Factors GIPL maintains a unique competitive advantage over other products in several categories. Our biggest differentiators include: Diverse Product Capabilities - GIPL intends to make it possible for Veterinarians to reduce laboratory charges while gaining a better across-the-board view of a number of conditions. User-Friendly - Our technology will be built to be easy to use and the user will only be required to have minimal technical savvy. Setup and configuration is expected to be simple. Affordability GIPLs gas chromatography units plan to be priced well below our competitors’ products with the goal of delivering superior functionality and value. This will be an essential factor in helping us continue to gain market share nationally. Team Strength Our team is comprised of industry veterans who bring decades of experience to the table across product launch, industrial design, medical testing, food and beverage and more. Our leadership team has a history starting and leading companies to successful exits and has established valuable relationships with industry leaders along the way that will help us strategically position Global Innovative Platforms as a market innovator in the days ahead. Investment Opportunity Global Innovative Platforms is currently seeking a total of $1M in equity financing to fuel the next stage of company growth. The use of proceeds includes manufacturing, pre-order fulfillment, ongoing development of our platform, and marketing efforts in order to continue expanding the GIPL brand. Any remaining funds will be allocated as operating capital. Why Invest in Global Innovative Platforms? Investors have the opportunity to get in on the ground floor with a company that is positioned to grow into a leading innovator in the veterinary sp...
COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE. The Philippines competitive landscape is a mix of strong local and large multinational players. In Sparkling, Pepsi and Asia Refreshment Corporation (RC) are the primary competitors, while Nestle, Universal Robina (C2) and Asia Brewery Inc. (Cobra) are the major Stills players. (See Annex 1 for details) Customer and channel evolution: Shopping habits will continue to evolve with increasing focus on value and convenience. While Sari-Sari Stores (Traditional Trade) will remain important and will continue to be the largest segment in the next years, Convenience Stores, at Work and HORECA channels will grow faster than Sari-Sari Stores. (See Annex 2 for Channel Gross Profit Opportunity Map)

Related to COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

  • Competitive Business The term “Competitive Business” means any person or entity that engages in any business activity that competes with the Company’s or an Affiliate’s or Subsidiary’s business in any way, in any geographic area in which the Company or an Affiliate or Subsidiary engages in business, including, without limitation, any state in the United States in which the Company or an Affiliate or Subsidiary sells or offers to sell its products from time to time.

  • Competitive Products Competitive Products" means products that serve the same function as, or that could be used to replace, products the Company provided to, offered to, or was in the process of developing for a present, former, or future possible customer/partner at any time during the twelve (12) months immediately preceding the last day of Participant's employment (or at any time during Participant's employment if Participant was employed for less than 12 months), with which Participant had direct responsibility for the sale or development of such products or managing those persons responsible for the sale or development of such products.

  • ANTI-COMPETITIVE BEHAVIOR Contractor will not collude, in any manner, or engage in any practice which may restrict or eliminate competition or otherwise restrain trade.

  • Competitive Activities During the term of this Agreement, Consultant will not, directly or indirectly, in any individual or representative capacity, engage or participate in or provide services to any business that is competitive with the types and kinds of business being conducted by Company.

  • Competitive Activity Executive shall be deemed to have engaged in "Competitive Activity" if, during the period commencing on the date hereof and ending on the second anniversary of the date Executive's employment with the Company or its subsidiaries terminates, (i) Executive, for himself or on behalf of any other person, firm, partnership, corporation, or other entity, engages, directly or indirectly, as an executive, agent, representative, consultant, partner, shareholder or holder of any other financial interest, in any business that competes with the Company or its subsidiaries in the line of business Executive is employed in by the Company or its subsidiaries (as applicable), as such business is described in any employment or severance agreement then in effect between Executive and the Company or one of its subsidiaries or, if no such agreement is then in effect, as described on Schedule II attached hereto (a "Competing Business"), it being understood and agreed that Executive's activities shall not satisfy this clause (i) where Executive is employed by a person, firm, partnership, corporation, or other entity engaged in a variety of activities, including the Competing Business, and Executive is not engaged in or responsible for the Competing Business of such entity. Executive may also, without satisfying clause (i) be a passive owner of not more than 2% of the outstanding publicly traded stock of any class of a Competing Business so long as Executive has no active participation in the business of such entity, except to the extent permitted above; or (ii) Executive (A) directly or indirectly through another entity, induces or attempts to induce any employee of the Company or its subsidiaries to leave the employ of the Company or its subsidiaries, or in any way interfere with the relationship between the Company or any of its subsidiaries and any employee thereof, (B) knowingly hires any person who was an employee of the Company or any of its subsidiaries within 180 days prior to the time such employee was hired by Executive, (C) induces or attempts to induce any customer, supplier, licensee or other business relation of the Company or any of its subsidiaries to cease doing business with the Company or its subsidiaries or in any way interfere with the relationship between any such customer, supplier, licensee or business relation and the Company or any subsidiary or (D) directly or indirectly acquires or attempt to acquire an interest in any business relating to the business of the Company or any of its subsidiaries and with which the Company or any of its subsidiaries has entertained discussions or has requested and received information relating to the acquisition of such business by the Company or its subsidiaries in the one-year period immediately preceding Executive's termination of employment with the Company.

  • Competitive Terms 22.4.1 If the Contracting Body is able to obtain from any Sub-Contractor or any other third party more favourable commercial terms with respect to the supply of any materials, equipment, software, goods or services used by the Supplier or the Supplier Personnel in the supply of the Goods and/or Services, then the Authority may:

  • Area The sphere of operation shall be England, Wales and Northern Ireland.

  • Buildings The Employer will provide and maintain all state-owned buildings, facilities, and equipment in accordance with the specific written order(s) of the Michigan Departments of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs and/or Military and Veterans Affairs. Where facilities are leased by the Employer, the Employer shall make every reasonable effort to assure that such facilities comply with the order(s) of the Michigan Departments of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs and/or Military and Veterans Affairs.

  • Shopping Goods and works estimated to cost less than $100,000 equivalent per contract may be procured under contracts awarded on the basis of Shopping.

  • Building and Improvements Lessor shall obtain and keep in force during the term of this Lease a policy or policies in the name of Lessor, with loss payable to Lessor and to any Lender(s), insuring against loss or damage to the Premises. Such insurance shall be for full replacement cost, as the same shall exist from time to time, or the amount required by any Lender(s), but in no event more than the commercially reasonable and available insurable value thereof if, by reason of the unique nature or age of the improvements involved, such latter amount is less than full replacement cost. Lessee-Owned Alterations and Utility Installations, Trade Fixtures and Lessee's personal property shall be insured by Lessee pursuant to Paragraph 8.4. If the coverage is available and commercially appropriate, Lessor's policy or policies shall insure against all risks of direct physical loss or damage (except the perils of flood and/or earthquake unless required by a Lender), including coverage for any additional costs resulting from debris removal and reasonable amounts of coverage for the enforcement of any ordinance or law regulating the reconstruction or replacement of any undamaged sections of the Building required to be demolished or removed by reason of the enforcement of any building, zoning, safety or land use laws as the result of a covered loss, but not including plate glass insurance. Said policy or policies shall also contain an agreed valuation provision in lieu of any co-insurance clause, waiver of subrogation, and inflation guard protection causing an increase in the annual property insurance coverage amount by a factor of not less than the adjusted U.S. Department of Labor Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers for the city nearest to where the Premises are located.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.