SWOT Analysis. << Analyse the strengths and weaknesses of the business and product or service, the opportunities that exist in the marketplace, and the threats to the viability of the project. This is best done in a matrix diagram as follows: Strengths Weaknesses Opportunities Threats >>
SWOT Analysis. STRENGTHS WEAKNESSES • Board Composition • Good Governance and organisational stability • Management and process capabilities • Strong asset base • A good blend of experienced, knowledgeable and innovative staff • Institutional knowledge and capacity • Quality product and services • Innovative technology (Hydropower) • Diversified tariff pricing model • Relationship with Labour • Memorandum of Understandings signed with tertiary and TVET institutions provide customized and accredited training opportunities • Unsecured Funding delays in implementation of CAPEX • Ageing infrastructure • Financial constraints • Over reliance on one major customer • Service area limitations OPPORTUNITIES THREATS • New/extended services: Engage in partnerships/SLAs with Municipalities to perform O&M on their behalf • Strategic partnerships/Twinning opportunities • Extend Implementing Agent projects • Alternative energy sources • Negotiable revised Contracts with major clients • Innovation, technology, research and development • Leveraging external Partnerships to fund infrastructure projects • Climate change effects on rainfall and raw water levels • Non-Payment risk by major clients • Municipalities challenging contractual conditions of the agreement • Dedicated legal processes on client challenges not followed by designated departments • Siltation and loss of capacity at Welbedacht Dam • Uncontrollable increase in electricity costs • Deteriorating quality of raw water • Lack of reservoir capacity of Mangaung Metropolitan Municipality • Executive Authority directives and impact thereof on financial sustainability • Catchment pollution • Power supply interruptions • Public protest and labour unrest • Debtors days • Servitude encroachment (informal settlement) WEAKNESSES Ageing infrastructure • Preventative Maintenance Plans are developed and implemented. • Condition of assets assessment are undertaken to determine the remaining useful life and corrective actions taken to remedy any deficiencies identified. • Budget allocations and plans developed to maintain and refurbish assets (See section on Project). • Adoption of a risk/proactive based management approach. • Establishment of a Pipe Reaction Team unit Delays to implement CAPEX • Regular CAPEX meetings are held to monitor progress in line with the Implementation Plan. Identified projects are selected and prioritised accordingly. • Revised CAPEX Procurement Cycle and Implementation Plans. • Sufficient finance to implement pro...
SWOT Analysis. CENTLEC used the tried and tested SWOT scientific tool to review its current strategy. SWOT analysis namely strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats analysis is a framework for identifying and analysing the internal and external factors that can have an impact on the viability. CENTLEC has a clearly defined captive market and have differentiated itself by offering a solid solution to fulfilling its clients’ needs now and into the future. Reasonable sales targets have been established with an implementation plan designed to ensure the goals set forth below are achieved. The business plan starts by defining various elements within each SWOT component followed by modification of the current objectives and strategies in ways to make CENTLEC successful. This includes the creation of sustainable competitive advantage. Although most of our competitive advantages are eroded steadily by the efforts of ‘competitors. The most critical part of this document is recommendations. We make good recommendations, meaning they are effective in solving the stated problem(s), practically implying they can be implemented in this situation, with the resources that are within reach, feasible within a reasonable time frame, cost-effective, not overly disruptive, and acceptable to key stakeholders. We have also considered "fits" between resources plus competencies with opportunities, and also fits between risks and expectations. Strengths and Weaknesses: These are internal factors within an organization viz. Human resources - staff, volunteers, board members, target population; Physical resources - location, building, equipment; Financial - grants, funding agencies, other sources of income; Activities and processes - programs, and systems; Past experiences - building blocks for learning and success, reputation in the community. Opportunities and Threats: These are external factors stemming from community or societal forces. Future trends in the industry; The economy - local, national, or international; Funding sources - foundations, donors, legislatures; Demographics - changes in the age, race, gender, culture of clientele; The physical environment; Legislation; Local, national, or international events.
SWOT Analysis. The following SWOT analysis captures the key strengths and weaknesses within the Company and describes the opportunities and threats facing [YOUR COMPANY NAME].
SWOT Analysis. It is possible to outline in a schema (i.e. the classical SWOT matrix) the main key factors seen as important for EAGLE. The SWOT analysis groups key pieces of information into two main categories: • internal factors – the strengths and weaknesses internal to the organization • external factors – the opportunities and threats presented by the environment external to the organization SWOT analysis can be used effectively to build a strategy with defined objectives. The SWOT matrix of EAGLE at this stage can be drafted as follows: STRENGTHS WEAKNESSES Network/Collaboration • Enthusiasm and commitment of the EAGLE partners in keeping the portal alive; • Strategic partnerships with Europeana, Wikimedia • Media Partnerships with Archeomatica, Ancient History Enciclopedia, Forma Urbis and Digital Meets Culture • Wide range of expertise and know-how in different fields; • Three Working Groups that offer best practice guidelines epigraphy • Geographical spread • Brand reputation Network/Collaboration: • Partners might focus their attention and resources to other, newly funded projects when the project period ends Content/Context • World largest database of ancient epigraphy • Aggregation of a diverse and broad range of epigraphic content not available elsewhere; • Contextual information and metadata from reliable institutions; • Multilingual access • Translations Content and context: • Partner‐curated collections not yet used extensively. Technology: • Interoperable technology for providing both metadata and content. • Metadata is provided to Europeana. • Use of open source software integrated and expanded by project leader CNR-ISTI which makes EAGLE non‐dependent upon a third‐ party supplier. Tecnology: • Technical dependencies and durability (relying on technical developments and architecture). OPPORTUNITIES THREATS • Positioning EAGLE as the reference epigraphic portal, both in Europe and globally. • A live and active Best Practice Network for the epigraphy with partners who have a lot of knowledge and experience. • Not all project partners can financially invest in EAGLE when the funding period ends.
SWOT Analysis. Facilitate a SWOT analysis on the community and Board activities as a basis for developing Goals and Objectives Goals & Objectives • Develop primary Goals and supporting Objectives Prioritization • Board members to confidentially prioritize the objectives Implementation / Tracking • Provide a form for easy progress tracking and reporting on the prioritized objectives Action Plan Development Service Profile ‐ 2021‐06‐07 (817) 992‐6156
SWOT Analysis. The SWOT analysis has been carried out on the above considered aspects and topics used to characterise the Programmes framework: – environment – territory, infrastructures and accessibility – demography – economy – labour market – trade – tourism – research and innovation A summary of the territorial and socio-economic characteristics of the areas on both sides of the Adriatic Sea indicates some priority aspects whose complexity reveals points of strength and weakne- ss which, in many cases, are similar on both eastern and western Adriatic countries. From the point of view of spatial development, the use of natural resources and the consequent general state of the environment, there is a difference in settlement patterns between MS and CC/PCC. With the high average density in MS and the a more scarce population density in CC/PCC. There is also a different intensity of development patterns. On the western side of the Adriatic these have resulted in very high levels of urbanisation. Along the coastal territory there is a clear loss in ecological continuity and pressure on the environment, especially where there is a concentration of tourism or productive activities (particular pressure and impact on the common watery body of the Adriatic eco system is mainly due to the Po river). The CC and PCC retain a more natural environmental state but are aiming to close the gap in development thus exerting new pressures on the territory in the absence of adequate regulations and planning. Moreover, internal migration is causing a strong increase in the ur- ban population. This could put natural resources at risk and threaten the balance of the environment which, in some cases, is already affected by air, water and soil pollution. In both instances however, one unequivocal point of strength is the vast presence of natural and cultural resources. The MS, in particular the Italian provinces, are characterised by a complex and highly hierarchical infrastructure network which is able to support high levels of transport demand. The density of the network is however a point of weakness because of its effect on en- vironmental continuity and the levels of congestion often witnessed. In the territories of the CC and PCC, the road and rail infrastructure are a point of weakness, which, in certain cases, seriously hampers the economic development of local communities. Demographically the tendency is average growth and in MS and CC/PCC, although there is a clear difference in the ...
SWOT Analysis. Stopa zaposlenosti na cijelom području Programa u prosjeku je 53%, no teritoriji država kandidatkinja i potencijalnih kandidatki- nja uvelike su ispod srednje vrijednosti. U smislu konkurentnosti proizvodnog sustava, a time i kapaciteta za osiguravanje zapošlja- vanja, oba teritorijalna sustava imaju jednake rizike. S jedne strane, države članice, osobito talijanske provincije, nisu kadre pokazati dovoljnu inovativnost. Razlog tomu je, između ostalog, nedostatak privatnih i javnih ulaganja na istraživanje i razvoj. S druge strane, države kandidatkinje i potencijalne kandidatkinje još uvijek su bli- sko vezane uz tradicionalnu ekonomiju koju karakterizira zakašnjeli razvoj uslužnog sektora. Dvije skupine stoga moraju nastojati povećati ulaganja u istraži- vanje i razvoj i tehnološke inovacije te ojačati i optimizirati svoju infrastrukturu koja sada predstavlja glavnu prepreku njihovoj kon- kurentnosti. Konačno, ogromna nepokretna imovina raspoložive je za korištenje u podupiranju razvoja i postoji velik potencijal za promjenu, potica- nje i privlačenje kapitala, tehnologije i kvalificiranog rada. Poticanje razvoja u raznim dijelovima područja Programa, iako su različita po svojim karakteristikama, zahtijeva potpuno i produktiv- no korištenje njihovih sredstava, što je moguće postići samo ukla- njanjem svih postojećih prepreka i neuspjeha. SWOT analiza ističe propadanje dijelova postojećih sredstava, po- put okoliša koji je pod pretjeranim pritiskom naselja i proizvodnje, kulturne baštine koja je vrlo dragocjena, ali nedovoljno zaštićena i iskorištena te infrastrukture, osobito prometa. Štoviše, nedostaje odgovarajuća metoda iskorištavanja ljudskih ka- paciteta koji, čak i ako su primjereno kvalificirani, ne pronađu odgo- varajuće zaposlenje u pravom znanstvenom i tehnološkom sektoru, također zbog loših veza između obrazovanja i proizvodnih sustava. Nadalje, uvjeti upravljanja, prilagođavanje pravnog okvira te plani- ranje teritorija i upravljanje njima, pokazuju zajedničke i raširene slabosti u državama članicama i državama kandidatkinjama/poten- cijalnim kandidatkinjama, iako se donekle razlikuju.
SWOT Analysis. The following SWOT analysis captures the key strengths and weaknesses within the company, and describes the opportunities and threats facing Mon Valley Aquaponics.
SWOT Analysis. The SWOT (Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats) analysis provides us with an opportunity to examine the internal strengths and weaknesses Three Monkeys Brewing must address. It also allows us to examine the opportunities presented to the BrewHouse as well as potential threats. Three Monkeys Brewing has a valuable inventory of strengths that will help us succeed. These strengths include: · Globally recognized brand with the famous statement, "Hear no evil, See no evil and Speak no evil". · Beer branding is globally connected culturally, socially and historically. · Collectibles are recognized and collected worldwide dating back to 700 B.C. · Knowledgeable and friendly staff, state-of-the-art brewery system. · Clear vision of market need and execution into the market place. · Strice Quality analysis and control to keep our brand integrity. · 100 percent on time all the time delivery into the local markets and three tier distribution system. Strengths are valuable, but it is also important to realize weaknesses. These weaknesses include: · A dependence on new brewery trends, quickly changing technology, and the cost factor associated with keeping up with new state-of-the art computer hardware and software changes in manufacturing processes. Our strengths will help us capitalize on emerging opportunities. These opportunities include, but are not limited to, a growing population of daily craft beer connesieurs, and the growing social bonds fostered by the new communities domestically and internationally. Threats that Three Monkeys Brewing should be aware of is emerging local competitors and pricing schemes. However, we believe our brand and quality will win out against local and national competition due to our global branding through put with people and the quality of premium style beer that we produce.
