Binding Recommendations Sample Clauses

Binding Recommendations. While the grievance investigation process is intended to yield only non-binding recommendations, the parties may agree that the recommendations will represent a binding award, in the manner of an arbitration award. Such agreement must be made in advance of the appointment of the Investigator.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Binding Recommendations. While the Investigator/Mediator procedure process is intended to yield only non-binding recommendations, the parties may agree that the recommendations will represent a binding award, in the manner of an arbitration award.
Binding Recommendations. In many cases, the Court provides that the PC may also give a binding recommendation to resolve parental disputes when the parents reach an impasse on issues that need to be resolved for the child(ren). The PC issues a binding recommendation based on information requested and received during the process of trying to resolve the dispute and will also give the rationale for said recommendation. However, the PC's recommendation is binding only to the extent specified by the Court and is subject to any appeal processes specified by the Court. The PC defers, at all times, to any specific orders of the Court, recognizing the Court's authority and ultimate responsibility to determine the best interests of the child(ren). (See also item #11 below.) Before giving a binding recommendation, the PC generally will obtain relevant information from the parents and the other information sources as already noted. When the PC believes that an immediate decision is necessary for the sake of the child(ren), he may issue the binding recommendation on the basis of information already reviewed, pending receipt of further information and issuance of a new decision, if necessary. When Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxxx makes decisions for us on items upon which we could not agree (binding recommendation), he shall issue the same in writing and deliver a copy of said recommendation to each party and his/her respective attorney, by mail, within fourteen (14) days, or at a later date as circumstances may control, from the date in which the binding recommendation was decided. Decisions of Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxxx that involve severe time constraints and, possible emergencies, may initially be made orally but communicated to both parties by Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxxx, and are binding. Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxxx will follow-up with a written document and copy to the parents’ attorneys and to the Court for approval as soon as possible. If either parent does not agree with the binding recommendation, he/she shall submit said issue to the Court for hearing. Binding recommendations and exhibits thereto shall be prepared by PC’s assistant at a rate of Eighty Dollars ($80.00) per hour as directed by Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxxx.

Related to Binding Recommendations

  • Conclusion and Recommendations D. Evaluations for Offenders without a sex offense conviction shall answer the following additional referral questions in the evaluations:

  • Representations and Recommendations Unless otherwise stated in writing, neither Xxxxxxxx Realty Inc, nor its brokers or licensees have made, on their own behalf, any representations or warranties, express or implied, with respect to any element of the Property including but not limited to, the legal sufficiency, legal effect, or tax consequences of this transaction. Any information furnished by either party should be independently verified before that party relies on such information. Xxxxxxxx Realty Inc. recommends that Buyer consult its attorneys and accountants before signing this Agreement regarding the terms and conditions herein and that Seller satisfy itself as to the financial ability of Buyer to perform.

  • Manufacturer's Recommendations All work or materials shall be installed in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations and requirements. The Contractor shall obtain the manufacturer’s recommendations and requirements, for its use at the Site in executing the Work, copies of bulletins, circulars, catalogues, or other publications bearing the manufacturer’s titles, numbers, editions, dates, etc. If the manufacturer’s recommendations and requirements are not available, the Contractor shall request installation instructions from the Design Professional.

  • Conclusions and Recommendations The demonstration and evaluation process provided an opportunity to test community specific tools with a range of end users from the memory institution domain and to gain greater insight into both the current and future evolution of the SHAMAN prototypes for preservation, access and re-use. Xxxx et al. (2000) in their user evaluation study of the Alexandria Digital Library which incorporated the evaluation of a Web prototype by earth scientists, information specialists and educators raised four key questions in relation to their findings that SHAMAN may be well advised to consider, they are paraphrased here with our conclusions from the investigations. What have we learned about our target organizations and potential users?  Memory institutions are most definitely not a homogenised group; their needs and requirements differ greatly across the domain.  Representatives of the archives community are agreed on the benefits of SHAMAN‟s authenticity validation function.  The representatives of government information services remained unconvinced as to the need or benefit of grid technologies or distributed ingest while librarians saw the value of grid access as an asset of the framework. What have we learned about the evaluation approach for digital preservation?  Within the limits of the exercise, in terms of time-frame and resources, the approach adopted has generated useful information for the further development of demonstrators and for the development of the SHAMAN framework overall. What have we learned about the SHAMAN ISP1 demonstrator?  Respondents to the evaluation questionnaires and the focus groups indicate that, overall, the presentation of the demonstrator worked effectively and that, in general, participants in the demonstration and evaluation events were able to understand the intentions of the demonstration and to apply the ideas presented to their own context. What have we learned about the applicability of the SHAMAN framework to memory institutions?  Respondents to the questionnaires and participants in the focus groups readily identified the value of the SHAMAN framework to their own operations. The majority had not yet established a long-term digital preservation policy, but recognized the need. Generally, the concepts of distributed ingest and grid operations found favour.  Virtually all practitioners in the focus groups, however, drew attention to need of a lower level demonstration that would be closer to their everyday preservation troubles, especially for digital preservation to be applied to non-textual materials, such as film, photographs and sound archives. In addition to the criteria suggested by Xxxx et al., we can add a further project-related question: What have we learned that has implications for the training and dissemination phase of the Project?  It was not part of the remit of the demonstration and evaluation specifically to discover information of relevance to the training and dissemination function. However, a number of factors will affect the efficacy of any training programme in particular. o First, no common understanding of digital preservation can be assumed of the potential target audiences for training. Consequently, it is likely that self-paced learning materials will be most effective in presenting the SHAMAN framework. o Secondly, the aims of SHAMAN as a project must be conveyed clearly: specifically, that it is a kind of „proof-of-concept‟ project and is not intended to deliver a package of programs capable of being implemented by institutions. o Thirdly, it needs to be emphasised that the SHAMAN framework is not limited to text documents; it can be applied to materials of all kinds. However, the demonstrations relate to bodies of material that were actually available for use. o Fourthly, the existing presentation materials are capable of being adapted for use in training activities. o Finally, the target audiences will appreciate the possibility of online access to the demonstrator, which will need to have very great ease of access in order that people with diverse backgrounds are able to use it with equal facility. We believe that, overall, WP14 has met its aims and objectives in this demonstration and evaluation of ISP1. Valuable lessons have been learnt by all parties involved, which will be transferred to the evaluation of ISP2 in the coming months.

  • Binding Agreements This Agreement and the other Financing Documents executed and delivered by the Borrowers have been properly executed and delivered and constitute the valid and legally binding obligations of the Borrowers and are fully enforceable against each of the Borrowers in accordance with their respective terms, subject to bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium and other laws of general application affecting the rights and remedies of creditors and secured parties, and general principles of equity regardless of whether applied in a proceeding in equity or at law.

  • Binding Nature This Agreement shall be binding upon, and inure to the benefit of, the successors and personal representatives of the respective parties hereto.

  • Binding Decision Before the date of the Mediation Hearing described below, the Corporate Secretary will contact the party (or parties) to determine whether they wish to be bound by any recommendation of the selected mediators for resolution of the disputes. If all wish to be bound, the Corporate Secretary will send appropriate documentation to them for their signatures before the Mediation Hearing begins.

  • Recommendations It is recommended that:

  • SUCCESSION AND BINDING AGREEMENT Except as otherwise set forth herein, all of the terms and provisions of this Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the successors and assignees of Department and Concessionaire and binding on a Trustee in bankruptcy.

  • EFFECTIVE AND BINDING AGREEMENT Xxxxx and OIG agree as follows:

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.