Binding Recommendations Sample Clauses

Binding Recommendations. While the grievance investigation process is intended to yield only non-binding recommendations, the parties may agree that the recommendations will represent a binding award, in the manner of an arbitration award. Such agreement must be made in advance of the appointment of the Investigator.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (40)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Binding Recommendations. While the Investigator/Mediator procedure process is intended to yield only non-binding recommendations, the parties may agree that the recommendations will represent a binding award, in the manner of an arbitration award.
Sample 1
Binding Recommendations. In many cases, the Court provides that the PC may also give a binding recommendation to resolve parental disputes when the parents reach an impasse on issues that need to be resolved for the child(ren). The PC issues a binding recommendation based on information requested and received during the process of trying to resolve the dispute and will also give the rationale for said recommendation. However, the PC's recommendation is binding only to the extent specified by the Court and is subject to any appeal processes specified by the Court. The PC defers, at all times, to any specific orders of the Court, recognizing the Court's authority and ultimate responsibility to determine the best interests of the child(ren). (See also item #11 below.) Before giving a binding recommendation, the PC generally will obtain relevant information from the parents and the other information sources as already noted. When the PC believes that an immediate decision is necessary for the sake of the child(ren), he may issue the binding recommendation on the basis of information already reviewed, pending receipt of further information and issuance of a new decision, if necessary. When Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxxx makes decisions for us on items upon which we could not agree (binding recommendation), he shall issue the same in writing and deliver a copy of said recommendation to each party and his/her respective attorney, by mail, within fourteen (14) days, or at a later date as circumstances may control, from the date in which the binding recommendation was decided. Decisions of Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxxx that involve severe time constraints and, possible emergencies, may initially be made orally but communicated to both parties by Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxxx, and are binding. Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxxx will follow-up with a written document and copy to the parents’ attorneys and to the Court for approval as soon as possible. If either parent does not agree with the binding recommendation, he/she shall submit said issue to the Court for hearing. Binding recommendations and exhibits thereto shall be prepared by PC’s assistant at a rate of Eighty Dollars ($80.00) per hour as directed by Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxxx.
Sample 1

Related to Binding Recommendations

  • Conclusion and Recommendations D. Evaluations for Offenders without a sex offense conviction shall answer the following additional referral questions in the evaluations:

  • Conclusions and Recommendations For the reasons stated herein, Merrimack Energy concludes that the shortlisting decisions by PG&E in the 2007 RPS RFO were reasonable and based on the requirements and evaluation criteria set forth in the Solicitation Protocol. The selection of the shortlist was very inclusive and erred on the side of including more offers in what was a very ample shortlist relative to the procurement target. In the Shortlist Report, Merrimack Energy recommended a number of changes to the RPS procurement process, several of which were adopted by PG&E in the 2008 RPS RFO. Despite recommending certain changes, our assessment is that the PG&E evaluation methodology was appropriate and that it was administered fairly and reasonably. Consistent with suggestions we had made in and after the Shortlist Report, PG&E developed a negotiation prioritization strategy with shortlisted bidders that created an active group of negotiations based on price and viability factors. The Mojave Solar bid was consistently placed in the secondary group and although its proposal changed over time from the proposal initially shortlisted, it remained in the secondary group during the course of contract negotiations. While the project sponsor is a very viable and experienced developer of solar thermal projects and is capable of developing the project effectively, there are concerns associated with the timing of the project that adds risk to the ultimate success of the project. PG&E has done an effective job in managing these risks through contract provisions in both the original contract and the amended and restated agreement. The details of the PPA and the amended and restated agreement are addressed in the Confidential Appendix to this report. While the positive attributes of the project should be balanced against the negative attributes in assessing whether or not the amended and restated agreement should be approved, the IE has concerns about project value for the customers. In addition to the high project cost and low market value, the project contains a number of challenges to meet its proposed construction start date primarily associated with transmission interconnection and access. While PG&E has negotiated provisions in the Amended and Restated contract that generally protects the interests of consumers, should the firm interconnection be delayed longer than anticipated, PG&E customers may be exposed to higher RA costs to back-up the project should the cost of capacity in the market exceed the price caps established in the contract. In conclusion, the IE has reservations about the contract based on project value including the levelized net market value calculations relative to project benchmarks from other recent solicitations. PG&E Gas and Electric Advice Filing List General Order 96-B, Section IV AT&T Dept of General Services Northern California Power Association Xxxxxxxx & Xxxx LLP Xxxxxxxx & Xxxxxxx Occidental Energy Marketing, Inc. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxx & Brand OnGrid Solar Xxxxxxxx & Xxxxx Xxxx Energy Praxair Arizona Public Service Company Economic Sciences Corporation X. X. Xxxx & Associates XXXX Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx & Xxxxxx LLP RCS, Inc. Xxxxxxxxx & Xxx, Inc. Xxxxxx Farms Recurrent Energy Xxxxxx Xxxxx Associates X. X. Xxxxxx & Assoc. SCD Energy Solutions Bloomberg GLJ Publications SCE Bloomberg New Energy Finance GenOn Energy, Inc. SMUD Boston Properties Goodin, MacBride, Xxxxxx, Xxxxxxx & Xxxxxxx XXXXX Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx XxXxxxxxxx, P.C. Green Power Institute San Francisco Public Utilities Commission Brookfield Renewable Power Xxxxx & Xxxxxx Seattle City Light CA Bldg Industry Association Hitachi Sempra Utilities CLECA Law Office In House Energy Sierra Pacific Power Company CSC Energy Services International Power Technology Silicon Valley Power California Cotton Ginners & Growers Assn Intestate Gas Services, Inc. Silo Energy LLC California Energy Commission Xxxxxxxx Berkeley National Lab Southern California Edison Company California League of Food Processors Los Angeles Dept of Water & Power Spark Energy, L.P. California Public Utilities Commission Xxxx, Forward, Xxxxxxxx & Scripps LLP Sun Light & Power Calpine MAC Lighting Consulting Sunshine Design Cardinal Cogen MBMC, Inc. Xxxxxxxxxx, Xxxxxx & Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx, Xxxxx XXX & Associates Tabors Caramanis & Associates Xxxxx, Xxxx Xxxxxx Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx Tecogen, Inc. City of Palo Alto XxXxxxxx & Associates Tiger Natural Gas, Inc. City of Palo Alto Utilities Merced Irrigation District TransCanada City of San Xxxx Xxxxxxx Irrigation District Turlock Irrigation District Clean Energy Fuels Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx United Cogen Coast Economic Consulting Xxxxxxxx & Xxxxxxxx Utility Cost Management Commercial Energy NLine Energy, Inc. Utility Specialists Consumer Federation of California NRG West Verizon Crossborder Energy NaturEner Wellhead Electric Company Xxxxx Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx LLP Navigant Consulting Western Manufactured Housing Communities Association (WMA) Day Xxxxxx Xxxxxx Xxxxxx & Xxxx Associates eMeter Corporation Defense Energy Support Center North America Power Partners

  • Binding Nature This Agreement shall be binding upon, and inure to the benefit of, the successors and personal representatives of the respective parties hereto.

  • Recommendations It is recommended that:

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!