Common use of Application and Selection Process Clause in Contracts

Application and Selection Process. Full Partners must inform regularly the Coordinating Institution of the needs for Scholars they foresee for the following intake and produce job descriptions to document those needs. Positions for scholars must be publicized on the Programme website and relay largely by Full Partners networks. An annual Call for Proposal is opened for each Programme intake. The Coordinating Institution is the sole recipient of the applications. Applicants are requested to submit by email: (a) a detailed CV including full contact information, a short professional profile, current employment status, academic and professional background (positions and projects) and teaching track-record and professional references; (b) a cover letter laying out what added-value the proposal could bring to the Programme, and notably with respect to student-centered teaching/lecturing, research activities and academic/professional networking in case of the mission include a teaching activity and/or the added-value the suggested mission will bring to the Programme cycle management of Consortium development, and (c) In the case the applicant apply to a teaching activity, a course proposal, including the course title, the Learning Outcomes (prerequisites, learning objectives and how these objectives fits into the sequence of the COSI Programme); a course syllabus (including course duration, themes covered by the courses, course sequence, cases-studies, learning materials, modes of learning, suggested readings…), desired teaching campus (France, Spain, Norway or Finland) and suggested teaching dates. Scholars are selected annually by the Academic and Management Board on the basis of a short-list constituted of any applications complying with the eligibility criteria and prepared by the Coordinating Institution. Any applicants must be informed by the Coordinating Institution of the outcome of their application and the list of successful applicants must be published on the Programme website. Applicants wishing to appeal on the Academic and Management Board decision shall be offered the opportunity to draft an appeal letter that must be transmitted to the Quality Assurance Board within a month following the publication of the selection outcome. The Quality Assurance Board may decide or not to ask the Academic and Management Board to reassess and reconsider the application, and to do so before beginning of the intake. The applicant will be informed of the appeal decision by a written instrument at the very least before the said Programme’s intake starts.

Application and Selection Process. Full Partners must inform regularly the Coordinating Institution of the needs for Scholars they foresee for the following intake and produce job descriptions to document those needs. Positions for scholars must be publicized published on the Programme website and relay largely by Full Partners networks. An annual Call for Proposal Proposals is opened open for each Programme intake, and applicants are advised to contact the Administrational Coordinator by email for further instructions. The Coordinating Institution is Scholars may be directly invited by the sole recipient Academic and Management Board, and also staff of the applications. Applicants participating organisations are requested to submit by email:eligible participants. (a) a detailed CV including full contact information, a short professional profile, current employment status, academic and professional background (positions and projects) and teaching track-record and professional references; (b) a cover letter laying out what added-value the proposal could bring to the Programme, and notably with respect to student-centered teaching/lecturing, research activities and academic/professional networking in case of the mission include a teaching activity and/or the added-value the suggested mission will bring to the Programme cycle management of Consortium development, and (c) In the case the applicant apply to a teaching activity, a course proposal, including the course title, the Learning Outcomes (prerequisites, learning objectives and how these objectives fits into the sequence of the COSI IMLEX Programme); a course syllabus (including course duration, themes covered by the courses, course sequence, cases-studies, learning materials, modes of learning, suggested readings…), desired teaching campus (FranceFinland, SpainBelgium, Norway France or FinlandJapan) and suggested teaching dates. Scholars are selected annually by the Academic and Management Board on the basis of a short-list constituted of any applications complying with the eligibility criteria and prepared by the Coordinating Institution. Any applicants must be informed by the Coordinating Institution of the outcome of their application and the list of successful applicants must be published on the Programme websiteapplication. Applicants wishing to appeal on the Academic and Management Board decision shall be offered the opportunity to draft an appeal letter that must be transmitted to the Quality Assurance Board within a month following the publication of the selection outcome. The Quality Assurance Board may decide or not to ask the Academic and Management Board to reassess and reconsider the application, and to do so before beginning of the intake. The applicant will be informed of the appeal decision by a written instrument at the very least before the said Programme’s intake startsinstrument.