Annotation Guidelines and The Current Version of The PDTB Sample Clauses

Annotation Guidelines and The Current Version of The PDTB. As Xxxxxx et al. (2006) mentioned, the PDTB puts forth important assets. For instance, discourse structure definitions of the PDTB are comprehensive and traceable. Also, the PDTB corpus enables syntactic, semantic and discourse level studies at the same time, which let researchers to conceive the relation between these levels. In addition to these, challenging NLP questions can be investigated by the PDTB. Finally, automatic discourse structure identifications can be performed via the PDTB. Undoubtedly, a corpus which has these important claims shall be reliable. Reliability of a corpus is measured by the quality of its annotations. The annotation quality is directly related with the annotation guidelines, which should be understandable, sound, and well-formed for conscientious annotations. To ensure high quality annotation, the PDTB presented two annotation guideline versions which annotators followed during their annotations. The first annotation guideline was presented in 2006 by the PDTB research group. The second version (PDTB Manual 2.0) was presented in 2008 and is still in use. In the current annotation guideline, the background theory, the annotation style, the explicit connectives and their arguments, the implicit connectives and their arguments, sense annotation, attribution annotation, and representation format of the PDTB are explained in detail. The PDTB
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Annotation Guidelines and The Current Version of The PDTB

  • Policies, Guidelines, Directives and Standards Either the LHIN or the MOHLTC will give the HSP Notice of any amendments to the manuals, guidelines or policies identified in Schedule C. An amendment will be effective in accordance with the terms of the amendment. By signing a copy of this Agreement the HSP acknowledges that it has a copy of the documents identified in Schedule C.

  • Modifications to the Anti-Corruption Guidelines The modifications to the Anti-Corruption Guidelines are as follows:

  • Interpretation & Application of Guidelines It is jointly agreed that the site representatives (union and management) are empowered to implement the guidelines as per the scope provided. It is jointly agreed that refresher training to explain the interpretation and application of the inclement weather clauses is to be conducted to ensure correct use. Unless these guidelines are followed, the employer will not be required to pay for lost time through inclement weather and the Disputes Board will be so briefed.

  • Agreed Guidelines Applications With respect to the application of the Sentencing Guidelines to this case, the parties stipulate and agree as follows:

  • Effect of Non-Agreement on Guidelines Applications The parties understand, acknowledge and agree that there are no agreements between the parties with respect to any Sentencing Guidelines issues other than those specifically listed in Paragraph 10, and its subsections. As to any other Guidelines issues, the parties are free to advocate their respective positions at the sentencing hearing.

  • IMPLICATIONS OF THE LISTING RULES As one or more of the applicable percentage ratios (as defined in the Listing Rules) of the transactions under the Finance Lease Agreement are more than 5% but less than 25%, the transactions under the Finance Lease Agreement constitute discloseable transactions of the Company under Chapter 14 of the Listing Rules, and are subject to the announcement and reporting requirements under the Listing Rules.

  • GEM LISTING RULES IMPLICATIONS As certain of the applicable percentage ratios (as defined under the GEM Listing Rules) in respect of the unsecured loan granted under the Supplemental Agreement to the Borrower were more than 5% but less than 25%, the unsecured loan granted under the Supplemental Agreement constitutes a discloseable transaction of the Company under Chapter 19 of the GEM Listing Rules and is therefore subject to reporting and announcement requirements under the GEM Listing Rules.

  • Interpretation and Application For purposes of this Chapter:

  • Compliance with Consensus Policies and Temporary Policies Registry Operator shall comply with and implement all Consensus Policies and Temporary Policies found at <xxxx://xxx.xxxxx.xxx/general/consensus-­‐policies.htm>, as of the Effective Date and as may in the future be developed and adopted in accordance with the ICANN Bylaws, provided such future Consensus Polices and Temporary Policies are adopted in accordance with the procedure and relate to those topics and subject to those limitations set forth in Specification 1 attached hereto (“Specification 1”).

  • Compliance with Executive Orders Concerning Ethics The Contractor warrants that he and his firm have complied in all respects with the Governor’s Executive Orders concerning ethics matters, including, but not limited to, Executive Order dated January 13, 2003 (establishing Code of Ethics for Executive Branch Officers and Employees, including provisions governing former officers and employees); Executive Order dated October 1, 2003 (governing vendors to state agencies and disclosure and registration of lobbyists); and O.C.G.A. Sections 21-5-70(5), 21-5-71 and 21-5-73, all as amended effective January 9, 2006 (requiring registration and disclosure filings by state agency vendor lobbyists). In this regard, the Contractor certifies that any lobbyist employed or retained by the Contractor or his firm has both registered and made the required disclosures required by the Executive Orders, as amended.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.