The Background Clause Examples

The Background. The Employee is employed by the Company under the terms of a contract dated 17th April 2012, headed “Statement of Main Terms of Employment.” The Employee’s employment with the Company will terminate on 4th October 2013, (“the Termination Date”). 2.1 Within this Agreement the words “Group Company” shall mean any company which from time to time is a subsidiary or a holding company of the Company or a subsidiary of such holding company and “subsidiary” and “holding company” have the meanings attributed to them by section 1159 of the Companies ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ or any modification or statutory re-enactment of the same. 2.2 This Agreement records the entire agreement pursuant to which the Company and the Employee have agreed to settle all claims that the Employee has or may have against the Company or any officer or employee of the Company or against any Group Company or any officer or employee of any such Group Company as stated in Clause 4.1 herein. No variation to these terms is valid unless set out in writing and signed by the Employee and the Company. 2.3 The Employee will spend the period from 12th August until the Termination Date on garden leave pursuant to paragraph 9.4 of the Company’s Employee Handbook. During this period the Employee will not attend the Company’s offices or carry out any duties for the Company, unless specifically requested to do so by the Company, but will be available to answer any queries during this time and will notify the Company or any planned holiday dates. During the garden leave period, the Employee will not have business dealings with the Company’s employees, customers or potential customers, agents or distributors and will not take up any other office, employment, consultancy or partnership, or trade on his own account, (referred to collectively as “Other Business Interests), without the Company’s prior written consent. During the garden leave period the Employee’s implied duties of loyalty and good faith shall continue to apply and on no account may he undertake any activities which compete directly or indirectly with the Company or any Group Company. Prior to commencing his period of garden leave, the Employee will co-operate with the Company in an orderly handover of his duties and responsibilities to such person or persons as the Company may direct and shall advise the Company of any passwords that he has used on the Company’s computer systems. 2.4 The Company confirms that the Employee’s salary in respect of the period up to...

The Background. The Council has assessed the Resident as needing residential based care which if not provided by the Council would not otherwise be available to the Resident.

The Background. The Issuer is the issuer of the Notes and the Convertible Note.

The Background. 1.1.1 Social Prescribing Link Workers are one of five additional roles being funded within Primary Care to bring additional capacity into the multi-disciplinary team, under the Network Contract DES. Through the new additional roles reimbursement scheme (as per the new GP Contract), Primary Care Networks (PCNs) will be guaranteed funding for 100% of the costs of additional social prescribing link workers. In 2019/20 funding will be available for one WTE Link Worker per PCN which equates to up to £34,113 (including on-costs). 1.1.2 Wandsworth CCG is proposing to deliver a borough-wide model of Social Prescribing through a single contract with a local Provider. To enable this, the CCG will utilise the funding made available to PCNs from NHS England, in addition to some supplementary funding made available by the CCG.

The Background. 3.1. Hokitika Lions Club Charitable Trust: Westland Scholarship Fund at its discretion offers Westland District students a scholarship scheme to provide students with financial assistance in their first year of tertiary study. 3.2. Student is a Westland District resident undertaking study at [institution].

The Background. The Paris Agreement follows on from two previous climate agreements made at the end of the last century: the 1992 UN Framework Convention on Climate Change and the 1998 Kyoto Protocol. Under the Kyoto Protocol, developed countries signed up to legally binding targets on greenhouse gas emissions. The protocol also includes the Clean Development Mechanism, through which developed countries fund projects in developing countries that would reduce overall global emissions while not making those reductions in their own countries. This is a form of what is known as carbon off-setting. The Paris Agreement is the first legally-binding climate change agreement that commits countries to emission reductions. It is viewed as fair because developed countries, who have benefited more from industrialization, have the responsibility to lead on the core actions of: global stock-take The Paris Agreement is historic because it commits global efforts to “holding the increase in the global average temperature to well below 2°C above pre-industrial levels and pursuing efforts to limit the temperature increase to 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels.” The IPCC has analysed that a 1.5°C temperature limit, in comparison to even a 2°C temperature limit, could prevent significant species extinction, human suffering and loss of life, as well as eco-system collapses that would include the irreversible melting of the Greenland ice cap and associated sea-level rise. All NDCs are available on the UNFCCC database. Under the Paris Agreement, each country defines its climate action in Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) which are updated and submitted every 5 years. NDCs provide mitigation targets and projects, adaptation goals and programmes, commitments on finance to be provided by developed countries and needed by developing countries, and the required technology and capacity. NDCs are intended to reflect the country’s highest possible ambition, recognizing “common but differentiated responsibilities and respective capabilities, in the light of different national circumstances.” Each country’s successive NDC must be more ambitious than the last one, and all NDCs must contribute to long term mitigation and adaptation goals, ensuring that countries collectively fulfill the Paris Agreement’s goals. To measure progress on this, countries engage in a every 5 years. The first will take place in 2023. This page is an excerpt from QUNO’s “People’s Climate Empowerment Series”, a publication th...

The Background. The Trust is the custodian of the Materials. The Material is held with approval by a recognised research ethics committee established under and operating to the standards set out in the governance arrangements issued by the UK Health Departments. The Recipient wishes to use the Materials for a specified use described in Annex 1 of this agreement for a Scheduled Purpose pursuant to applicable legislation including but not limited to the Human Tissue ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ and Data Protection Legislation. The Trust is willing to provide Materials on the terms and conditions of this Agreement and the Recipient agrees to comply with such terms and conditions.

The Background. Investigation will be a minimum requirement, and some Buyer business units or departments may have more stringent Background Investigation requirements for particular roles as permitted or required by applicable Law, including: (1) license or professional certification verifications; (2) physical and psychological examinations, including random drug testing; (3) education verifications; and/or (4) driver’s license/MVR check. Any requirement to have the additional Background Investigation set forth under this Section 19.5.2 will be addressed in the applicable Purchase Order.

The Background. [1] The claim is a claim against the 1st and 3rd defendants for damages for breach of contract and/or negligence and as against the 2nd defendant, for damages for breach of contract only. Initially, the claimant’s claim against the 2nd defendant was for damages for breach of contract and negligence, but subsequently, the claimant’s lead counsel informed the court that his client was no longer pursuing his claim against the 2nd defendant, for damages for negligence.