Analysis Level Sample Clauses

Analysis Level. In the first year of the ID4EV project, the analysis and design model of the system and subsystems were developed. The main system is the Comfort Range Balancer and its subsystems, among them the Range Problem Solver. Dynamic and static diagrams were developed on both abstraction levels. The models evolved from more abstract and vague analysis model to concrete and detailed design models. Especially the HMI interaction concept was worked out even in an early phase of the project, but also the dynamics or other components as the range problem solver was worked out this way. For the most parts of the system, UML activity charts were used, one partner directly started to implement the dynamics in Simulink. As a sample for static and dynamic diagrams the behaviour and integration of the range problem solver, as worked out on analysis level, is shown below. Figure 2-19: Embedded Range Problem Solver on Analysis level The diagram above shows an earlier view of the range problem solver and its collaboration with other system components. Figure 2-20: Dynamic View of Range Problem Solver (including data flows) Figure 2-21: Dynamic View of Range Problem Solver Dialog (including data flows)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Analysis Level. As a step towards system realization, the vehicle level features are realised by some interconnected abstract functions at the analysis level, specifying the corresponding input functions, application functions, and output functions for each vehicle level function in an implementation independent way. For the target braking system, the vehicle features of concern are implemented by a set of analysis functions shown in Figure 2-25 and Figure 2-26. Figure 2-25: Advanced Braking feature and the specification of its functional realizations in Papyrus. Figure 2-26: Regenerative Braking Control feature and the specification of its functional realizations in Papyrus.
Analysis Level. In the first year of the ID4EV project, the analysis and design model of the system and subsystems were developed. The main system is the Comfort Range Balancer and its subsystems, among them the Range Problem Solver. Dynamic and static diagrams were developed on both abstraction levels. The models evolved from more abstract and vague analysis model to concrete and detailed design models. Specially the HMI interaction concept was worked out even in an early phase of the project, but also the dynamics or other components as the range problem solver was worked out this way. For the most parts of the system, UML activity charts were used, one partner directly started to implement the dynamics in Simulink. As a sample for static and dynamic diagrams the behavior and integration of the range problem solver, as worked out on analysis level, is shown below.
Analysis Level. Analysis level represents a preliminary functional decomposition that realize the vehicle features with the principal internal and external interfaces. Starting from the vehicle features of the selected subsystem, a collection of preliminary functions to acquire sensors, manage the torque and the changes between the vehicle driving modes has been designed The following pictures shown the main preliminary functions defined and their interaction Figure 2-2: Propulsion - Analysis Function Types Figure 2-3 Propulsion - Functional Analysis Architecture
Analysis Level. As a step towards system realization, the vehicle level features are realised by some interconnected abstract functions at the analysis level, specifying the corresponding input functions, application functions, and output functions for each vehicle level function in an implementation independent way. For the target braking system, the vehicle features of concern are implemented by a set of analysis functions shown in Figure 2-39 and Figure 2-40. Figure 2-39: Advanced Braking feature and the specification of its functional realizations in Papyrus. Figure 2-40: Regenerative Braking Control feature and the specification of its functional realizations in Papyrus. Figure 2-41 shows the specification of functional architecture in EAST-ADL for the braking system (See also D6.1.1 for an overview the functional operation concept). Figure 2-41: Functional Analysis Architecture specification of the Regenerative Braking System in Papyrus. In EAST-ADL, system boundaries are explicitly defined by means of functional devices (FunctionalDevice). Through functional devices, an analysis function interacts with the physical environment. Figure 2-42 shows the connections between functional devices and the physical environment. Figure 2-42: Connecting functional analysis functions with environment in Papyrus. To define the timing requirements and timing design, constructs like TimingConstraint, EventChain and Event are available in EAST-ADL.

Related to Analysis Level

  • Measuring EPP parameters Every 5 minutes, EPP probes will select one “IP address” of the EPP servers of the TLD being monitored and make an “EPP test”; every time they should alternate between the 3 different types of commands and between the commands inside each category. If an “EPP test” result is undefined/unanswered, the EPP service will be considered as unavailable from that probe until it is time to make a new test.

  • Staffing Levels To the extent legislative appropriations and PIN authorizations allow, safe staffing levels will be maintained in all institutions where employees have patient, client, inmate or student care responsibilities. In July of each year, the Secretary or Deputy Secretary of each agency will, upon request, meet with the Union, to hear the employees’ views regarding staffing levels. In August of each year, the Secretary or Deputy Secretary of Budget and Management will, upon request, meet with the Union to hear the employees’ views regarding the Governor’s budget request.

  • Sound Level Company will take all reasonable measures to reduce to a minimum vibrations that may cause damage to any equipment, structure, building or portion of any building whether on the Premises, Common Use Areas, or located elsewhere on the Airport, and to keep the sound level of its operation as low as possible.

  • Service Level Expectations Without limiting any other requirements of the Agreement, the Service Provider shall meet or exceed the following standards, policies, and guidelines:

  • Mileage Measurement Where required, the mileage measurement for LIS rate elements is determined in the same manner as the mileage measurement for V&H methodology as outlined in NECA Tariff No. 4.

  • Test The outer surface of the lamp lenses shall be subjected once or more than once to the action of the sand jet produced as described above. The jet shall be sprayed almost perpendicular to the surface to be tested. The deterioration shall be checked by means of one or more samples of glass placed as a reference near the lenses to be tested. The mixture shall be sprayed until the variation in the diffusion of light on the sample or samples measured by the method described in Appendix 2, is such that: Δ d = (T5 - T4) / T2 ≤ 0.0250 ± 0.0025 Several reference samples may be used to check that the whole surface to be tested has deteriorated homogeneously. Annex 6 - Appendix 4

  • Financial testing The financial covenants set out in Clause 20.2 (Financial condition) shall be tested by reference to each of the financial statements and/or each Compliance Certificate delivered pursuant to Clause 19.2 (Compliance Certificate).

  • Evaluation Criteria 5.2.1. The responses will be evaluated based on the following: (edit evaluation criteria below as appropriate for your project)

  • Offense Level Calculations i. The base offense level is 7, pursuant to Guideline § 2B1.1(a)(1).

  • Stability Testing Patheon may be requested to conduct stability testing on the Products in accordance with the protocols set out in the Specifications for the separate fees and during the time periods set out in Schedule C to a Product Agreement. Patheon will not make any changes to these testing protocols without prior written approval from Client. If a confirmed stability test failure occurs, Patheon will notify Client within one Business Day, after which Patheon and Client will jointly determine the proceedings and methods to be undertaken to investigate the cause of the failure, including which party will bear the cost of the investigation. Patheon will not be liable for these costs unless it has failed to perform the Manufacturing Services in accordance with the Specifications, cGMPs, and Applicable Laws. Patheon will give Client ail stability test data and results at Client’s request.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.