Purposeful availment definition
Purposeful availment means something akin to either a deliberate undertaking to do or cause an act or thing to be done in Michigan or conduct that properly can be regarded as a prime generating cause of resulting effects in Michigan. Something more than a passive availment of Michigan opportunities must exist that gives the defendant reason to foresee being haled before a Michigan court. [Id. at 231.]
Purposeful availment means that the defendant’s contacts with the forum state must not be random, fortuitous, attenuated, or the result of unilateral activity of a third person or another party. Id.
Purposeful availment means that the defendant’s “contacts proximately result from the actions by the defendant himself that create a ‘substantial connection’ with the forum State. Burger King Corp. v. Rudzewicz, 471 U.S. 462, 475 (1985) (emphasis in original) (quoting McGee v. Int’l Life Ins. Co., 355 U.S. 220, 223 (1957)). This purposeful availment requirement “ensures that a defendant will not be haled into a jurisdiction solely
More Definitions of Purposeful availment
Purposeful availment. [11] means something akin to either a deliberate undertaking to do or cause an act or thing to be done in Michigan or conduct that properly can be regarded as a prime generating cause of resulting effects in Michigan. Something more than a passive availment of Michigan opportunities must exist that gives the defendant reason to foresee being haled before a Michigan court. [But a] defendant need not have been physically present in a state for limited personal jurisdiction to exist in that state.
Purposeful availment means something akin to either a deliberate undertaking to do or cause an act or thing to be done in Michigan or conduct that properly can be regarded as a prime generating cause of resulting effects in Michigan. Something more than a passive availment of Michigan opportunities must exist that gives the defendant reason to foresee being haled before a Michigan court. A defendant need not have been physically present in a state for limited personal jurisdiction to exist in that state.” W H Froh, at 231 (intern citations omitted). “The defendant must deliberately engage in significant activities within a state, or create continuing obligations between himself and residents of the forum to the extent that it is presumptively not unreasonable to require him to submit to the burdens of litigation in that forum as well.” Vargas