Well Testing Sample Clauses

The Well Testing clause defines the procedures and responsibilities related to the testing of oil or gas wells to assess their productivity and characteristics. It typically outlines the timing, methods, and standards for conducting such tests, as well as the allocation of costs and the sharing of test results between parties. By establishing clear guidelines for well testing, this clause ensures that all parties have reliable data for decision-making and helps prevent disputes over testing methods or results.
Well Testing. 13.1. During the drilling of the ▇▇▇▇▇ carried out pursuant to this Agreement, the Contractor must keep the Minister informed of the progress of each Well, its proposals for tests, as well as the results of and reports relating to such tests. 13.2. Upon agreement between the Minister and the Contractor, the Contractor must test any prospective zones and conduct additional tests, within the agreed well depth, provided that such tests are consistent with Best International Industry Standards and Practices and do not interfere with the safety and efficiency of Petroleum Operations. Such tests shall be taken into consideration when assessing the Contractor’s mandatory work programme.
View SourceView Similar (6)
Well Testing. ▇▇▇▇▇ may be exempted from the provisions of Section 8(b) of this agreement for the purpose of testing if test criteria are agreed to by both Inyo County and LADWP at a Technical Group meeting.
View Source
Well Testing. SE will perform the following tests on the City's water ▇▇▇▇▇.
View Source
Well Testing. Upon reasonable notice, Sublessor may at its expense obtain gas samples from any well drilled by Sublessee on the Leases.
View Source
Well Testing. CHG will evaluate the existing network of pumping and monitoring ▇▇▇▇▇ and select representative locations to perform pumping tests in the fringe areas. These tests will be used to determine aquifer characteristics and physical parameters. Some existing pumping test data is available for the Eastern Valley area, but will require well owner permission to release the information. Pumping tests will be planned and budgeted for existing equipped ▇▇▇▇▇. If a pump installation is required for a specific location that could provide valuable information, CHG can rent and install a temporary pump or work with the District and a pump contractor to have the equipment installed, depending on the circumstances and equipment needed. CHG personnel have decades of experience designing and conducting pumping tests. Where access is available, we can deploy state‐of‐the‐art pressure transducer equipment with barometric pressure compensation for obtaining high‐quality data. Observation ▇▇▇▇▇ can be particularly useful during pumping tests, and will be given priority during the screening process for selecting test locations. No public agency ▇▇▇▇▇ are known to exist in the Los Osos fringe areas, and cooperation from growers and rural homeowners will be key to the success of the field investigation. CHG personnel have served the Eastern Valley area for decades, which should help with gaining access to properties for tasks 2.5 and 2.6. There are many factors that determine whether or not an aquifer test can adequately characterize hydraulic connectivity across a fault line or the presence of a flow boundary. CHG will consider the available options on whether a pumping test for boundary characterization in the Los Osos fringe area appears feasible for use with a BBMR. Pumping tests will be scheduled individually during the basin characterization effort. The duration of a test will vary, based on the objective and produced water constraints.
View Source
Well Testing 
View Source

Related to Well Testing

  • Random Testing Notwithstanding any provisions of the Collective Agreement or any special agreements appended thereto, section 4.6 of the Canadian Model will not be applied by agreement. If applied to a worker dispatched by the Union, it will be applied or deemed to be applied unilaterally by the Employer. The Union retains the right to grieve the legality of any imposition of random testing in accordance with the Grievance Procedure set out in this Collective Agreement.

  • Drug Testing (A) The state and the PBA agree to drug testing of employees in accordance with section 112.0455, F.S., the Drug-Free Workplace Act. (B) All classes covered by this Agreement are designated special risk classes for drug testing purposes. Special risk means employees who are required as a condition of employment to be certified under Chapter 633 or Chapter 943, F.S. (C) An employee shall have the right to grieve any disciplinary action taken under section 112.0455, the Drug-Free Workplace Act, subject to the limitations on the grievability of disciplinary actions in Article 10. If an employee is not disciplined but is denied a demotion, reassignment, or promotion as a result of a positive confirmed drug test, the employee shall have the right to grieve such action in accordance with Article 6.

  • ODUF Testing 6.6.1 Upon request from TWTC, AT&T shall send ODUF test files to TWTC. The Parties agree to review and discuss the ODUF file content and/or format. For testing of usage results, AT&T shall request that TWTC set up a production (live) file. The live test may consist of TWTC’s employees making test calls for the types of services TWTC requests on ODUF. These test calls are logged by TWTC, and the logs are provided to AT&T. These logs will be used to verify the files. Testing will be completed within thirty (30) days from the date on which the initial test file was sent.

  • Alcohol Testing Alcohol testing will be conducted by using an evidential breath-testing device (EBT) approved by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. A screening test will be conducted first. This initial screening may be accomplished using a saliva test kit. If the result is an alcohol concentration level of less than 0.02 percent, the test is considered a negative test. If the alcohol concentration level is 0.02 percent or more, a second confirmation test using the EBT will be conducted. The procedures that will be utilized by the lab for collection and testing of the specimen are attached hereto as Appendix A.

  • Performance Testing (a) All performance tests of the Project, including any Initial Performance Test required in Section 2 of Appendix VIII, will be performed in accordance with the test procedures set forth in Appendix VIII (“Performance Test”), including additional procedures and protocols related to Performance Testing as mutually agreed between Buyer and Seller (“Test Procedures”). Seller shall bear all costs and receive all revenues, if applicable, associated with all Performance Tests. (b) After the Initial Delivery Date and during the Delivery Term, Buyer will have the right to conduct a Performance Test (“Buyer Performance Test”) no more than once a calendar year to demonstrate whether the Project is capable of delivering the Distribution Services at the Contract Capacity. Within 30 calendar days following a Buyer Performance Test, Seller will have the right to retest the Project with a Performance Test (“Seller Retest”). For the avoidance of doubt, the results of any Seller Retest will supersede the results of the preceding Buyer Performance Test. (i) If a Buyer Performance Test or, if a corresponding Seller Retest has occurred, a Seller Retest demonstrates the Project is capable of delivering Distribution Services at or above ninety-nine percent (99%) of the Initial Contract Capacity, the Contract Capacity will remain the Initial Contract Capacity; (ii) If a Buyer Performance Test or, if a corresponding Seller Retest has occurred, a Seller Retest demonstrates the Project is capable of delivering Distribution Services at more than or equal to eighty-five (85%) of the Initial Contract Capacity, but less than ninety-nine percent (99%) of the Initial Contract Capacity (“Testing Band”), the Contract Capacity will be automatically adjusted (upwards or downwards) to the capacity commensurate with the amount of Distribution Services the Project delivered during the Performance Test within the Testing Band. (iii) If a Buyer Performance Test or, if a corresponding Seller Retest has occurred, a Seller Retest demonstrates the Project is not capable of delivering Distribution Services of at least eighty-five percent (85%) of the Initial Contract Capacity, an Event of Default shall occur in accordance with Section 7.1(a)(viii).