Common use of Universal Service Clause in Contracts

Universal Service. Any Party has the right to define the kind of universal service obligation it wishes to maintain. Such obligations will not be regarded as anti-competitive per se, provided they are administered in a transparent, non-discriminatory and competitively neutral manner and are not more burdensome than necessary for the kind of universal service defined by the Party.

Universal Service. Any Each Party has the right to define the kind of universal service obligation it wishes to adopt or maintain. Such obligations will obligation shall not be regarded as anti-competitive per se, provided they are it is administered in a transparent, non-discriminatory and competitively neutral manner and are it is not more burdensome than necessary for the kind of universal service defined by the Party.

Universal Service. Any Each Party has the right to define the kind of universal service obligation it wishes to maintain. Such obligations will obligations, including any cross subsidisation policy set out under each Party's domestic laws, shall not be regarded as anti-competitive per se, provided they are administered in a transparent, non-discriminatory and competitively neutral manner and are not more burdensome than necessary for the kind of universal service defined by the Party.

Universal Service. Any Each Party has the right to define the kind of universal service obligation obligations it wishes to maintain. Such obligations will shall not be regarded as anti-competitive per se, provided that they are administered in a transparent, non-discriminatory and competitively neutral manner manner, and are not more burdensome than necessary for the kind of universal service defined by the Party.

Universal Service. Any Each Party has the right to define the kind of universal service obligation it wishes to maintain. Such obligations will not be regarded as anti-competitive per se, provided they are administered Each Party shall administer any universal service obligation that it maintains in a transparent, non-discriminatory and competitively neutral manner manner, and are shall ensure that its universal service obligation is not more burdensome than necessary for the kind of universal service defined by the Partythat it has defined.

Universal Service. Any Party has the right to define the kind of universal service obligation it wishes to maintain. Such obligations will not be regarded as anti-anti- competitive per se, provided they are administered in a transparent, non-discriminatory and competitively neutral manner and are not more burdensome than necessary for the kind of universal service defined by the Party.

Universal Service. Any Each Party has the right to define the kind of universal service obligation it wishes to maintain. Such obligations will not be regarded as anti-competitive per se, provided they are administered in a transparent, non-discriminatory and competitively competi­ tively neutral manner and are not more burdensome than necessary for the kind of universal service defined by the Party.. Article 228

Universal Service. Any 1. Each Party has the right to define the kind of universal service obligation obligations it wishes to adopt or maintain. Such 2. The obligations will referred to in paragraph 1 shall not be regarded as anti-competitive per se, provided they that such obligations are administered in a transparent, objective and non-discriminatory and competitively neutral manner and are not more burdensome than necessary for the kind manner. The administration of universal service defined by the Party.such obligations shall also

Universal Service. Any 1. Each Party has the right to define the kind of universal service obligation it wishes to maintain. Such obligations will not be regarded as anti-competitive per se, provided they are administered in a transparent, non-discriminatory and competitively neutral manner and are not more burdensome than necessary for the kind of universal service defined by the Party.

Universal Service. Any Each Party has the right to define the kind of universal service obligation it wishes to maintain. Such obligations will not be regarded as anti-competitive per se, provided they are administered in a transparent, non-discriminatory and competitively competi­ tively neutral manner and are not more burdensome than necessary for the kind of universal service defined by the Party.. Article 101

Universal Service. Any Each Party has the right to define the kind of universal service obligation it wishes to maintain. Such obligations will not be regarded as anti-competitive per se, provided they are administered in a transparent, non-discriminatory and competitively neutral manner and are not more burdensome than necessary for the kind of universal service defined by the Party.

Universal Service. Any Each Party has the right to define the kind of universal service obligation obligations it wishes to maintain. Such obligations will shall not be regarded as anti-competitive per se, provided that they are administered in a transparent, non-discriminatory discriminatory, and competitively neutral manner manner, and are not more burdensome than necessary for the kind of universal service defined by the Party.

Universal Service. Any Each Party has the right to define the kind of universal service obligation obligations it wishes to maintain. Such obligations will shall not be regarded as anti-competitive anticompetitive per se, provided that they are administered in a transparent, non-discriminatory and competitively neutral manner and are not more burdensome than necessary for the kind of universal service defined by the Party.

Universal Service. Any Party has the right to define the kind of universal service obligation it wishes to maintain. Such obligations will not be regarded as anti-competitive per se, provided they are administered in a transparent, non-discriminatory and competitively neutral manner and are not more burdensome than necessary for the kind of universal service defined by the Party.. Article 108

Universal Service. Any Each Party has the right to define the kind type of universal service obligation obligations it wishes to maintain. Such adopt or maintain and shall administer such obligations will not be regarded as anti-competitive per se, provided they are administered in a transparent, non-discriminatory discriminatory, and competitively neutral manner manner, and shall ensure that universal service obligations are not no more burdensome than necessary for the kind type of universal service defined by the Partythat has been defined.

Universal Service. Any Each Party has the right to define the kind of universal service obligation it wishes to maintain. Such obligations will obligations, including any cross subsidisation policy set out under each Party’s domestic laws, shall not be regarded as anti-competitive anticompetitive per se, provided they are administered in a transparent, non-discriminatory and competitively neutral manner and are not more burdensome than necessary for the kind of universal service defined by the Party.

Universal Service. Any Each Party has the right to define the kind of universal service obligation it wishes to maintain. Such obligations will obligations, including any cross subsidisation policy set out under each Party’s domestic laws, shall not be regarded as anti-anti- competitive per se, provided they are administered in a transparent, non-discriminatory and competitively neutral manner and are not more burdensome than necessary for the kind of universal service defined by the Party.

Universal Service. Any Party has the right to define the kind of universal service obligation it wishes to adopt or maintain. Such obligations will not be regarded as anti-competitive per se, provided they are administered in a transparent, non-discriminatory and competitively neutral manner and are not more burdensome than necessary for the kind of universal service defined by the Party.

Universal Service. Any Each Party has the right to define the kind of universal service obligation it wishes to maintain. Such obligations will not be regarded as anti-competitive per se, provided they are administered in a transparent, non-discriminatory and competitively neutral manner and are not more burdensome than necessary for the kind of universal service defined by the Party.. Article 101

Universal Service. Any Each Party has the right to define the kind of universal service obligation it wishes to adopt or maintain. Such obligations will obligation shall not be regarded as anti-competitive per se, provided they are administered it is admin­ istered in a transparent, non-discriminatory and competitively neutral manner and are it is not more burdensome than necessary for the kind of universal service defined by the Party.

Universal Service. Any Each Party has the right to define the kind type of universal service obligation obligations it wishes to maintain. Such adopt or maintain and shall administer such obligations will not be regarded as anti-competitive per se, provided they are administered in a transparent, non-discriminatory and competitively neutral manner manner, and shall ensure that universal service obligations are not no more burdensome than necessary for the kind type of universal service defined by the Partythat has been defined.

Universal Service. Any Each Party has the right to define the kind of universal service obligation obligations it wishes to maintain. Such maintain and shall administer those obligations will not be regarded as anti-competitive per se, provided they are administered in a transparent, non-discriminatory nondiscriminatory, and competitively neutral manner and shall ensure that its universal service obligations are not more burdensome than necessary for the kind of universal service defined by the Party.

Universal Service. Any Each Party has the right to define the kind of universal service obligation obligations it wishes to maintain. Such adopt or maintain and shall administer those obligations will not be regarded as anti-competitive per se, provided they are administered in a transparent, non-discriminatory nondiscriminatory, and competitively neutral manner and shall ensure that its universal service obligations are not more burdensome than necessary for the kind of universal service defined by the Party.

Universal Service. Any Party has the right to define the kind of universal service obligation it wishes to maintain. Such obligations will not be regarded as anti-competitive per se, provided they are administered in a transparent, non-discriminatory and competitively competi­ tively neutral manner and are not more burdensome than necessary for the kind of universal service defined by the Party.

Universal Service. Any Each Party has the right to define the kind of universal service obligation it wishes to maintain. Such obligations will obligations, including any cross subsidisation policy set out under each Party’s domestic laws, shall not be regarded as anti-competitive anticompetitive per se, provided they are administered in a transparent, non-non- discriminatory and competitively neutral manner and are not more burdensome than necessary for the kind of universal service defined by the Party.

Universal Service. Any Each Party has the right to define the kind of universal service obligation it wishes to maintain. Such obligations will not be regarded as anti-competitive per se, provided they are administered in a transparent, non-discriminatory and competitively neutral manner and are not more burdensome than necessary for the kind of universal service defined by the Party.. Article 203. Licences

Universal Service. Any Each Party has the right to define the kind of universal service obligation obligations it wishes to maintain. Such obligations will shall not be regarded as anti-anti- competitive per se, provided that they are administered in a transparent, non-discriminatory and competitively neutral manner and are not more burdensome than necessary for the kind of universal service defined by the Partymanner.

Universal Service. Any Each Party has the right to define the kind type of universal service obligation obligations it wishes to maintain. Such adopt or maintain and it shall administrate said obligations will not be regarded as anti-competitive per se, provided they are administered in a transparent, non-discriminatory and competitively neutral manner and manner, ensuring that universal service obligations are not more burdensome than is necessary for the kind type of universal service defined by the Partythat has been defined.

Universal Service. Any Each Party has the right to define the kind of universal service obligation obligations it wishes to maintain. Such maintain and shall administer those obligations will not be regarded as anti-competitive per se, provided they are administered in a transparent, non-discriminatory discriminatory, and competitively neutral manner and are shall ensure that its universal service obligation is not more burdensome than necessary for the kind of universal service defined by the Partythat it has defined.

Universal Service. Any 1. Each Party has the right to define the kind of universal service obligation it wishes to maintain. Such obligations That obligation will not be regarded per se as anti-competitive per secompetitive, provided they are that it is administered in a transparent, non-discriminatory and competitively neutral manner and are is not more burdensome than necessary for the kind of universal service defined by the Party, with regard to all suppliers subject to the obligation.

Universal Service. Any Party has the right to define the kind of universal service obligation it wishes to maintain. Such obligations will not be regarded as anti-anti- competitive per se, provided they are administered in a transparent, non-non- discriminatory and competitively neutral manner and are not more burdensome than necessary for the kind of universal service defined by the Party.

Universal Service. Any Party has the right to define the kind of universal service obligation it wishes to maintain. Such obligations will not be regarded as anti-competitive per se, provided they are administered in a transparent, non-discriminatory and competitively neutral manner and are not more burdensome than necessary for the kind of universal service defined by the Party.. Article 112