Understood Clause Samples
The "UNDERSTOOD" clause serves to confirm that all parties acknowledge and comprehend the terms and conditions outlined in the agreement. In practice, this clause may require parties to affirm that they have read, understood, and agreed to the contract's provisions, sometimes by initialing or signing next to the clause. Its core function is to prevent disputes over misunderstandings by ensuring that all parties are aware of and accept their obligations and rights under the contract.
Understood. NG9-1-1 Call Handling System (CHS)
Understood. Upon signing on to the voluntary list these responsibilities will be detailed and explained to the employee by the Company.
Understood. So for me to try to be clearer, so you would agree that the information displayed in Figure 41 does not limit the term "map view"ị ▇▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇: Objection. Form. Foundation. 1 11:22:28 2 11:22:33 3 11:22:37 4 11:22:40 5 11:22:43 6 11:22:54 7 11:22:55 8 11:22:57 9 11:23:02 10 11:23:06 11 11:23:08 12 11:23:10 13 11:23:17 14 11:23:19 15 11:23:23 16 11:23:26 17 11:23:34 18 11:23:35 19 11:23:40 20 11:23:49 21 11:23:51 22 11:23:55
Understood pm) MS DWARKA: ▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇, before the break I had told you that, from February 2016, when GCEN gets involved, payments into LCF's account were made. You said that payments were made in blocks and you had asked me to identify. So can we look at his third statement, page 5, paragraph 14.
Understood. But for those CLECs who choose to 22 use the electronic method, they are all using the 1 same electronics, correct, on the Ameritech end?
Understood a. Failure at any step of this procedure to communicate the decision on a grievance within the specified time limits shall permit the aggrieved employee to proceed to the next step. Failure at any step of this procedure to appeal a grievance to the next step within the specified time limits shall be deemed to be acceptance of the decision rendered at that step.
b. It is understood that employees shall, during and notwithstanding the pendency of any grievance, continue to observe all assignments and applicable rules and regulations of the Board until such grievance has been fully resolved under the terms of this section.
Understood. So in terms of your deposition today, what did you do to prepareị A. I spoke with ▇▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇, I read through my declaration, and I think I looked over ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.
Understood. But a stable document that was not disagreed with is essentially the foundation on which we (I think) understood we were working. No-one criticised them as being too legalistic at the time. from ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ to Everyone: I do not believe it's true that I asked people to wait for IETF counsel's comments. On the contrary, I said repeatedly that people should talk to their own counsel. But I also don't think that we are going to be successful by debating the past, since none of us has privileged access to The Truth of What Happened from ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ to Everyone: I think we need to figure out how to move forward instead from ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ to Everyone: hand from ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ to Everyone: hand from ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ to Everyone: Yes, everyone should be there, so we can work in real time with all h ands. from ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ to Everyone: hand from ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ to Everyone: Everyone has the invite. It is a call with all four parties. from ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ to Everyone: (and ICANN) from ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ to Everyone: @▇▇▇. AFAIR - only delays was with lawyers responses to principals for various reasons. I do not recall that response (or not) from IETF held things up at all. from ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ to Everyone: ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, that's consistent with my recollection as well. from ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ to Everyone: @▇▇▇▇. Good points. Focusing on what is achievable is highly desirable. Perhaps even by providing some proposed (alternative?) solutions to achieve the objectives. from ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ to Everyone: Hand from ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ to Everyone: Hand from ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ to Everyone: I'll defer to ▇▇▇▇ from ▇▇▇▇▇ to Everyone: hand from ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ to Everyone: hand from ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ to Everyone: @▇▇▇▇, I believe ▇▇▇▇▇ mentioned that there were inconsistencies. @▇▇▇▇▇, would it be possible to highlight them perhaps later in an email? from ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ to Everyone: Could we identify the things that are important enough to need approval (not just advice) from the CCG? from ▇▇▇▇▇ to Everyone: I thought we were not engaging on substance today from ▇▇▇▇▇ to Everyone: Can we stick to process, as agreed today? from ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ to Everyone: I didn't mean now. Email is fine. from ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ to Everyone: @▇▇▇▇: My understanding is that the concern was about the marks being registered in an unbounded number of additional jurisdictions from ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ to Everyone: So far, the marks are only registered in the US, and I haven't seen any suggestion that they should be registered elsewhere...