Technical Ratings Sample Clauses

Technical Ratings. 12.3.1 Technical Rating Scale is as follows: Numeric Rating Adjective Description 0 Unacceptable Fails to meet minimum requirements; e.g., no demonstrated capacity, major deficiencies which are not correctable; offeror did not address the factor.
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Technical Ratings. Rating Description Acceptable Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements. Proposal has no strengths or deficiencies. Unacceptable Proposal does not meet requirements and contains one or more deficiencies and is unawardable.
Sample 1
Technical Ratings. The Technical Factor will receive “Acceptable” or “Unacceptable” rating as follows: Technical Acceptable/Unacceptable Ratings Rating Description Acceptable Proposal clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation. Unacceptable Proposal does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation.
Sample 1
Technical Ratings. The technical evaluation will be an assessment of the offeror’s ability to meet the requirements of the solicitation, to include but not be limited to, the Performance Specification and associated drawings. The evaluation will also consider the successful application of Government and industry standards and best practices and innovative approaches that added value to the project/program and benefitted the Government. The objective of the evaluation is to:
Sample 1
Technical Ratings. The Government will evaluate proposals to determine compliance with all requirements of the solicitation, including any attachments and exhibits. The Government will evaluate each proposal strictly in accordance with its content. The Government will not assume that the performance will include areas not specified in the Offeror’s proposal. The Government will evaluate the Offeror's proposal against the minimum requirements set out in Attachment 02 "Requirements Matrix" to determine whether the proposal is "Acceptable" or "Unacceptable" utilizing the rating and descriptions provided below. An Offeror's technical proposal will not be found Acceptable unless all the minimum requirements are found Acceptable. A rating of Unacceptable for any requirement will cause the entire technical proposal to be found Unacceptable and may cause the Offeror not be considered for award. The Offeror's proposal will be evaluated against the requirements outlined in Attachment 02, Requirements Matrix, to the solicitation to determine whether the proposal is acceptable or unacceptable as described below: Rating Description Acceptable Proposal meets the requirements of the solicitation Unacceptable Proposal does not meet the requirements of the solicitation
Sample 1

Related to Technical Ratings

  • Industry Ratings The City will only accept coverage from an insurance carrier who offers proof that it:

  • Moody’s Xxxxx’x Investors Service, Inc. and its successors.

  • Ratings No “nationally recognized statistical rating organization” as such term is defined for purposes of Rule 436(g)(2) (i) has imposed (or has informed the Company that it is considering imposing) any condition (financial or otherwise) on the Company’s retaining any rating assigned to the Company or any securities of the Company or (ii) has indicated to the Company that it is considering any of the actions described in Section 7(c)(ii) hereof.

  • Evaluation Rating The final summative evaluation level that is assigned to a teacher based on the holistic review of all Evaluation Factors, observed during the Evaluation Cycle. The rating shall be “accomplished”, “skilled”, “developing”, or “ineffective”. The final rating shall not be weighted in such a way that one (1) domain or component of the evaluation system has a higher importance than another, except that any area marked N/A shall not negatively impact the evaluation rating.

  • BBB SCDHEC shall mean the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control and its authorized representatives. CCC. Statement of Basis shall mean the report(s) describing the corrective measure(s)/remedial action(s) being con ducted pursuant to South Carolina Hazardous Waste Management Regulations, as amended.

  • Performance Rating Describes the Educator’s performance on each performance standard and overall. There shall be four performance ratings:  Exemplary: the Educator’s performance consistently and significantly exceeds the requirements of a standard or overall. The rating of exemplary on a standard indicates that practice significantly exceeds proficient and could serve as a model of practice on that standard district-wide.  Proficient: the Educator’s performance fully and consistently meets the requirements of a standard or overall. Proficient practice is understood to be fully satisfactory.

  • Rating The Notes can be issued without the requirement that they have any rating from a nationally recognized statistical rating organization.

  • Credit Rating With respect to the Competitive Supplier or Competitive Supplier’s Guarantor, its senior unsecured, unsubordinated long-term debt rating, not supported by third party credit enhancement, and if such debt is no longer rated, then the corporate or long-term issuer rating of Competitive Supplier or Competitive Supplier’s Guarantor.

  • PRIORITY RATING If so identified, this Contract is a "rated order" certified for national defense, emergency preparedness, and energy program use, and SELLER shall follow all the requirements of the Defense Priorities and Allocation System Regulation (15 C.F.R. Part 700).

  • Student Grades Teachers have the responsibility for assigning student grades as earned by the student through established criteria. Teachers also have the responsibility to maintain records that reflect criteria for those grades given.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.