Sup. Ct., that service of appointment of conservator for a lawyer’s or legal paraprofessional’s practice on a financial institution modifies an agreement of deposit between the lawyer or legal paraprofessional and the financial institution.
Sup. 6 The tools resources are hosted externally to a single organization / institution in a sustainable third- party repository (e.g. SourceForge, GoogleCode, LaunchPad, GitHub) which will live beyond the lifetime of the E-ARK project. Table 63 details the answers provided for each tool for each of the assessment criteria regarding the support viewpoint. In this table ‘Y’ stands for Yes, ‘N’ for No and ‘P’ for Partial. Each tool is identified by T’X’ which stands for Tool ‘X’, as identified in the introduction for this section. Table 63 - Technical Evaluation Assessment Results for the Support Viewpoint ID T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 T7 T8 T9 T10 T11 SUP.1 P N Y N N P N N N P P SUP.2 Y N N Y Y Y N Y N P Y SUP.3 Y N Y Y Y N N Y N P Y SUP.4 Y N N Y N N N N N N Y SUP.5 Y Y Y Y N N N Y N Y P SUP.6 Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Table 64 details the comments provided by tool developers to the technical evaluation self-assessment questionnaire for the support viewpoint. It only presents comments that complement the answer provided. Table 64 - Technical Evaluation Assessment Comments for the Support Viewpoint Criterion Comment Tool 1 SUP.1 The web site links to xxxx://xxx.xxxxxxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx/ which contains this information SUP.2 xxxx://xxx.xxxxxxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx/
Sup. 4 They link to the "new issue" page, which asks the user for information about the problem: xxxxx://xxxxxx.xxx/keeps/db-visualization-toolkit/issues/new SUP.5 xxxx://xxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxxxxxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx/ includes a support section, xxxxx://xxx.xxxx.xx/contactos/?lang=en which includes the email xxxx@xxxx.xx linking to SUP.6 GitHub Tool 5 SUP.1 Support / contact information is available on the tool website SUP.2 Support / contact information is available SUP.3 Support / contact information is available Tool 8 SUP.2 See project README. Tool 11 SUP.2 Under construction SUP.5 Configurable Analysis The Analysis viewpoint aims at analysing the overall structure of the source code and naming conventions, and also verify if coding standards are followed. Table 65 details the assessment criteria used for this viewpoint. Table 65 - Technical Evaluation Analysis Viewpoint Assessment Criteria ID Criterion
Sup. Ct., filed June 6, 2000) xxx Xxxx Gerstley, derivatively on behalf of Nominal Defendant ICN Pharmxxxxxxxxxx, Xnc. v. Norman Barker, Jr., et al., No. 19947 (Del.Ch., filed October 1, 2000.)
