Student Input Sample Clauses
The "Student Input" clause defines the expectations and procedures for students to provide feedback, suggestions, or information relevant to a course or educational program. Typically, this clause outlines the channels through which students can submit their input, such as surveys, meetings, or written communications, and may specify how this input will be reviewed or acted upon by faculty or administration. Its core practical function is to ensure that students have a formalized way to contribute their perspectives, thereby promoting a responsive and adaptive educational environment.
POPULAR SAMPLE Copied 1 times
Student Input a. The District and the Association agree that the purpose of student input is to provide meaningful feedback to assist teachers and supervisors in their reflection on and improvement of teaching practices. A staff member’s administrative supervisor(s) is/are the sole evaluator(s) of that staff member’s performance. The District is responsible for providing information to students regarding the purpose of student input and their opportunity to provide it. The District may use department, school, and district aggregate data as benchmarks to identify growth in instructional practices. Classroom teachers are required to collect unidentifiable input from students in Grades 6-12. The procedure used for student input must provide for student anonymity.
b. The staff member may devise, subject to approval by his/her supervisor/evaluator, forms and procedures for the collection of student input, or s/he may use forms and procedures provided by the District.
c. Student input shall be collected by the classroom teacher prior to the end of the first semester and for semester courses again prior to the end of the school year. The teacher shall share input received with his/her supervisor.
d. Student input shall not form the basis for a less than “meets Standards” evaluation unless corroborated by the evaluation process described in this Article.
Student Input. Assessment of teaching effectiveness may also include student input obtained by means of a formal process. The AC shall have access to such data. All student data shall be collected in a regular and systematic fashion and in writing consistent with existing College/University policy and procedures.
Student Input. This section is in place for all unit members, except those participating in the two-year pilot program specified in a separate MOU.
Student Input. The District, in collaboration with the Association, may conduct a pilot to gather input from students in grades 9 through 12 to improve teaching and administrative practices to meet district, school, and departmental goals.
Student Input. 8.11.1. By the end of final examination week of each semester, students in all classes, with enrollments of five students or more, shall have received or been given access to the Student Ratings form for Teaching (Appendix C7). Where used, paper survey forms shall be collected by a student and returned to the immediate supervisor or the supervisor's designee. The data on the forms will be summarized and returned to the faculty member for use in evaluation.
8.11.2. By May 1st, all students shall have received, or been given access to the Student Ratings form for advising (Appendix C8). Where used, paper survey forms shall be returned to the faculty member's immediate supervisor or the supervisor's designee. The data on the forms will be summarized and returned to the faculty member for use in evaluation.
8.11.3. Student complaints concerning a faculty member, which have been brought to the attention of that faculty member’s immediate supervisor, shall be brought to the attention of the affected faculty member by his or her immediate supervisor within a time period not to exceed ten (10) University days of the complaint, or disregarded in subsequent evaluations by the immediate supervisor. Anonymous student complaints received outside of the Student Ratings form for Teaching and the Student Ratings form for Advising shall not be used in evaluations.
8.11.4. Faculty members may at any time submit evidence of professional achievement, teaching ability, or service to the University for inclusion in their personnel files.
8.11.5. Faculty members receiving unsatisfactory evaluations will work with the immediate supervisor, and where appropriate, peer reviewers/mentors, to prepare a faculty improvement plan within 30 days which must be submitted to the immediate supervisor for approval. The improvement plan will address deficiencies as noted in the evaluation and may include professional development activities related to improving teaching based on evidence of student learning outcomes.
8.11.6. Faculty Peer Reviewers must perform the duties of a peer review.
8.11.7. Evaluations for special assignments and those faculty on more than 50% non-teaching appointments will be performed by the immediate supervisor and will be based upon effectiveness in fulfilling the responsibilities defined by:
a) For special assignments - the description of work completed in accordance with section 11.6.4.
b) For assignments over 50% non-teaching (i.e. Librarians) – the position descri...
Student Input. A systematic procedure must be established at the department level to receive student input. The provisions for student input must conform to the guidelines outlined in the General Guidelines for Personnel Actions, Section 2.5.
Student Input. (This section will be temporarily replaced by a two-year pilot program specified in a separate MOU for the 2023-24 and 2024-25 school years.)
a. The District and the Association agree that the purpose of student input is to provide meaningful feedback to assist teachers and supervisors in their reflection on and improvement of teaching practices. A staff member’s administrative supervisor(s) is/are the sole evaluator(s) of that staff member’s performance. The District is responsible for providing information to students regarding the purpose of student input and their opportunity to provide it. The District may use department, school, and district aggregate data as benchmarks to identify growth in instructional practices. Classroom teachers are required to collect unidentifiable input from students in Grades 6-12. The procedure used for student input must provide for student anonymity.
b. The teacher may devise, subject to approval by their supervisor/evaluator, forms and procedures for the collection of student input, or they may use forms and procedures provided by the District.
c. Student input shall be collected by the classroom teacher prior to the end of the first semester and for semester courses again prior to the end of the school year. The teacher shall share input received with their supervisor.
d. Student input shall not form the basis for a less than “meets Standards” evaluation unless corroborated by the evaluation process described in this Article.