Site-Based Decision Sample Clauses

Site-Based Decision. 32.01 Site Based Decision (SBD) is the process by which the teachers at the work site jointly make decisions affecting their working conditions. Decisions made by SBD Committee will not violate the Agreement. Decisions made by the SBD Committee will be approved by the Association and Board prior to implementation of the decisions.
Sample 1Sample 2See All (5)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Site-Based Decision. Making Committees - Both Parties to this Agreement endorse site based decision-making and/or participatory management at the school level. The Parties jointly encourage parent involvement and minority representation on all decision making committees. There shall be no reprisals for professional participation.
Sample 1Sample 2
Site-Based Decision. Making The District and Association agree that site-based decision-making is a joint planning and problem- solving process that seeks to improve the education of Bethel students. Within the first two months of school, each building principal will conduct a staff meeting to review the projected building budget, expenditure plans, and other matters concerning the operation of the school. Site council decisions that are contrary to the negotiated agreement require an Association waiver prior to implementation. No employee will be excluded from the bargaining unit as a supervisory or managerial employee, within the meaning of the laws, by reason of his or her participation in a site-based decision-making arrangement. Site-based decision-making will be based on sufficient consensus as defined by the school's site council.
Sample 1Sample 2
Site-Based Decision. MAKING‌‌ Decisions, which directly impact the learner, are often best made at the school level where the needs of the learner are best known. A shared decision-making model that involves employees will build trust, will result in higher quality decisions, will ensure ownership of decisions, and will create a base of support for school initiatives. In the event a site-based decision-making team decision requires a waiver of any school board policy, district/building administrative program, or state rule or regulation, the administration will review the waiver as needed. In the event a decision by the team contains a provision that is contrary to a collective bargaining agreement, such provision shall be submitted to the district and the union for consideration of a mutually satisfactory accommodation for a specific period. In the event that a decision impacts a support department, the team will seek an accommodation of the impact with the appropriate support department administrator and staff. Site-based teams may include all interested employees. This following Article 18 is contingent on full levy funding.‌
Sample 1

Related to Site-Based Decision

  • SITE-BASED DECISION MAKING A. The District shall provide the training and staff development to support accountability/site- based decision-making activities. Teachers shall be given release time to attend these programs.

  • Quality-based Selection Services for assignments which the Bank agrees meet the requirements set forth in paragraph 3.2 of the Consultant Guidelines may be procured under contracts awarded on the basis of Quality-based Selection in accordance with the provisions of paragraphs 3.1 through 3.4 of the Consultant Guidelines.

  • Review Protocol A narrative description of how the Claims Review was conducted and what was evaluated.

  • Claim Decision Upon receipt of such claim, the Plan Administrator shall respond to such claimant within ninety (90) days after receiving the claim. If the Plan Administrator determines that special circumstances require additional time for processing the claim, the Plan Administrator can extend the response period by an additional ninety (90) days for reasonable cause by notifying the claimant in writing, prior to the end of the initial ninety (90) day period, that an additional period is required. The notice of extension must set forth the special circumstances and the date by which the Plan Administrator expects to render its decision. If the claim is denied in whole or in part, the Plan Administrator shall notify the claimant in writing of such denial. The Plan Administrator shall write the notification in a manner calculated to be understood by the claimant. The notification shall set forth:

  • Constructability Review Prepare detailed interdisciplinary constructability review within Fourteen (14) days of receipt of the plans from the District that:

  • Office of Inspector General Investigative Findings Expert Review In accordance with Senate Bill 799, Acts 2021, 87th Leg., R.S., if Texas Government Code, Section 531.102(m-1)(2) is applicable to this Contract, Contractor affirms that it possesses the necessary occupational licenses and experience.

  • Impartial Decisions The Design Professional is the interpreter of the conditions of the Construction Contract and the judge of its performance, in the first instance. The Design Professional shall side neither with the Owner nor with the Contractor, but shall use its powers to enforce performance by both.

  • Review of Decision Within sixty (60) days after the Secretary’s receipt of a request for review, he or she will review the Company’s determination. After considering all materials presented by the Claimant, the Secretary will render a written opinion, written in a manner calculated to be understood by the Claimant, setting forth the specific reasons for the decision and containing specific references to the pertinent provisions of this Agreement on which the decision is based. If special circumstances require that the sixty (60) day time period be extended, the Secretary will so notify the Claimant and will render the decision as soon as possible, but no later than one hundred twenty (120) days after receipt of the request for review.

  • Review Procedure If the Plan Administrator denies part or all of the claim, the claimant shall have the opportunity for a full and fair review by the Plan Administrator of the denial, as follows:

  • The Decision If mediation fails or is not appropriate and if the decision can be rendered after a short deliberation, the arbitrator will do so. By meeting first with counsel to explain the framework of the arbitrator's decision, the parties are provided with an opportunity to influence the exact terms of resolution. Within the framework of settlement as outlined by the arbitrator, the parties can work out exact terms which best suit the specifics of the case. Such an opportunity should not be wasted by continuing to argue the merits of the case. With respect to grievances involving customer complaints, the following will apply:

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.