Round. 1 – Is a competitive round. Where a surplus teacher is the successful applicant in Round 1 he or she is no longer considered a surplus teacher during the remaining staffing process. Any teacher who was successful in Round 1 shall not be permitted to apply for other teaching positions.
Round. 2 - Each employee will be given an opportunity to schedule their remaining vacation entitlement and may do so by selecting full weeks or single days (if any remaining after the first round or retained from weeks containing paid holidays). Also, employees may elect not to schedule their remaining vacation entitlement during this round.
Round. 9 NA 1 SSF (consolidated) % of plantation workers (15-49 years) who had more than one sexual partner in the past 12 months reporting the use of condom during their last sexual act 15% 30-Sep-12 A special survey will be conducted to capture the indicator data . Round 6 %of plantation workers aged 15-49 who both correctly identify ways of preventing the sexual transmission of HIV and who reject major misconceptions about HIV transmission. 40% 2008 KAP Study The indicator is to measure the knowledge of Plantation workers .As described above, A special survey will be done to measure the outcome indicators . Round 9 NA 2 SSF (consolidated) % of plantation workers aged 15-49 who both correctly identify ways of preventing sexual transmission of HIV and who reject major misconception about HIV transmission 60% 30-Sep-12 A special survey will be conducted to capture the indicator data . Round 6 NA 64% 2007 BSS (Behavioural Surveillance Survey) All the indicators are specific to Round 9and will be measured through IBBS/BSS.Due to resource constraint and epidemiological evidence and in the absence of adequate interventions targeted at MARP post survey , the IBBS has been planned after six years from base line.
Round. 37 The client’s level of greediness: 0.0525735. The GRA’s reservation value: 166.354; The GRA’s level of greediness: 5.51316. The GRA’s proposal: 70.4398. The client’s would-be proposal: 67.6995. The negotiation ends in round 37 with the client obtaining the amount of resource, 70.4398, which is the last best proposal of the GRA, i.e. the client has accepted the GRA’s proposal. In our model, the GRA sends its proposal every negotiation round and the client replies with a counter-proposal (if applicable). The GRA may decide not to send a proposal, but to accept or reject the last client’s counter-proposal instead. Table 3.3: List of notation for Section 3.3 Symbol Notation k An identifier of the round of negotiation, where k ∈ N. rˆgra, rˆgraj i,k i,k The proposed by the GRA (expected to be proposed) amount ofj resource rˆgra ≥ 0 (rˆgra > 0) in round k for task i, where k, i ∈ N. i,k i,k βgra, βgraj i,k i,k The actual or expected by a client GRA’s level of greediness respectively in round k for task i, where k, i ∈ N. Continued on the next page Symbol Notation ∆rˆgra, ∆rˆgraj i,k i,k The difference between the proposed by the GRA (expected) j amount of resource rˆgra ≥ 0 (rˆgra > 0) in round k and its initial i,k i,k proposal Gmin > 0 respectively, where k, i ∈ N. i ∆rˆmax, ∆rˆmaxj i,k i,k The difference between the actual GRA’s reservation value Gmax > 0 (or expected Gmaxj > 0) and the GRA’s aspiration i,k i,k value Gmin > 0 in round k, where k, i ∈ N. i δi,k The client’s estimate of the change in the increment of the GRA’s reservation value in round k for task i, where k, i ∈ N. ηi,k% The percentage of the client’s level of greediness βc in roundi,k−1 k − 1 on which βc has to be increased or decreased in order to calculate its i,k−1 greediness in round , where . level of βc k k, i ∈ N i,k µA (x) . Σ A generic representation of the membership function, which pro- duces the values from the interval [0, 1], of the variable x in fuzzy set A. µF δi,k, βc l i,k The resulting input membership function, which produces a min- imum (conjunction) of the membership functions µXj (δi,k) and µY j .βc Σ where Xj = D|Z|I and Y j = GEN|IND|GR, accord- i,k ing to control rule l which refers to a particular output fuzzy set F = LD|M D|Z|MI|I, where k, i, l ∈ N. µl (ηi,k)F The truncated membership function µF (ηi,k) for the output fuzzy set F , according to control rule l, where k, i, l ∈ N. φ(·) An implication function, which truncates the membership func- tion µF (ηi,k), a...
Round. For Head 2 Head events any changes to the original prospectus must be communicated to Archery England Archery England Head to Head Series shall be open to all archers. Record Status: Application for Record Status will be the responsibility of the host Tournament Organiser (TO) in accordance with requirements of the event in which the Archery England category is held. The Fee will be reimbursed by Archery England Entry Fee: The entry fee for the tournament shall be determined by the organisers. Archery England shall not be liable for any reimbursement other than as detailed in this document. All entry fees and other income shall be retained by the organisers. Advertisement / Entry Forms: The detailed prospectus of the event is the responsibility of the Event Organiser which will include the Archery England logo and detail of awards. Links will be established between the event hosts and the Archery England web-site. Medals: Archery England Medals may be engraved. Medal allocation in accordance with entries and will be at the discretion of Archery England having taken the advice of the Organiser. Assistance: Archery England and the host club shall each appoint a named point of liaison who will be available as required between both parties. Archery England Executive member/s and or a designated officer will wherever possible, be in attendance at the event, and may only at the request of the organiser be involved in the prize giving. Logo: The Archery England logo will be used on entry forms and other promotional material. Where possible the Archery England ‘Feathers’ will be displayed. Title: When the tournament is run under the umbrella of another event the title of the tournament shall contain the legend "Incorporating Archery England” Results: will be made available via electronic means with links to Archery England website within one week of the tournament. Officials: The appointment of the Event Judges will be responsibility of the host T.O. Copies of judges and other reports may be requested by Archery England Event details to be completed by TO prior to agreement Archery England Event: Archery England Liaison: Contact details: Archery England Representative at the Event: Host: Incorporated into: Venue: Date:
