Rollback. Personal leave shall accrue to a maximum of 960 hours. The Employer will compensate the employees on an hour-for-hour basis for any accrued amount over 960 hours as of September 30 each year. These payments may be as early as the second pay day in November, but shall be made no later than the first pay day in December at the September 30 rate of pay.
Rollback. The Employer will compensate the employee on a day for day or shift for shift basis for any personal leave days accrued over that amount each year. For the purpose of determining annual leave accrued and/or payments, a year shall be from October 1 to September 30. These payments shall be made no later than the first pay day in December at the September 30 rate of pay.
Rollback. The Employer will compensate the employee on a day for day or shift for shift basis for any personal leave days accrued over that amount each year. For the purpose of determining annual leave accrued and/or payments, a year shall be from October 1 to September 30. These payments shall be made no later than the first pay day in December at the September 30 rate of pay. 4 1 hr. = .93, 2 hrs. = 1.87, 3 hrs. = 2.80, 4 hrs. = 3.73, 5 hrs. = 4.67, 6 hrs. = 5.60, 7 hrs. = 6.53, 8 hrs. = 7.46, 9 hrs. = 8.40, 10 hrs. = 9.33, 11 hrs. = 10.26, 12 hrs. = 11.20
Rollback. In the same way as illustrated by VaryStep in Fig. 8, we can model a so- phisticated algorithm suggested in [5]. We define a Rollback monitor that has the same structure as VaryStep. Its Monitor (a) saves the state us- ing fmi 2GetFMUState before each step of co-simulation, and (b) queries the maximum step size that each FMU is prepared to take. This uses an extra FMI API function fmi2GetMaxStepSize. In Adjust , if any of the maxi- mum values returned is lower than that originally proposed, the states of the FMUs are reset using fmi 2SetFMUState, and the time as well as the step size are adjusted (using setT and updateSS ). We have again proved validity, termination, and determinism. In [5], determinism is also based on the FMU states, which are visible via fmi2Get and fmi2Set. On the other hand, that work considers determinism with respect to the order of retrieval and update of variables and execution of the FMUs. In our models, this order is fixed. To establish determinism in that sense, we need to consider a highly parallel model with all valid ex- ecution orders respecting the port dependency graph. This is the approach in [8], where verification uses theorem proving. The approach taken here is more amenable to model checking and sufficient to verify sequential imple- mentations of simulations. As explained in the previous section, the definition of Interaction is deter- mined by structural information about the FMUs configuration. Using that information, and a choice of master algorithm (fixed or variable step, treat- ment of fmi2Discard, and so on), we can obtain a model. For the FMUs, in the previous section, we have explained how to derive (sketches of) mod- els.
Rollback. In case of Rollback decided pursuant to article 7.1.5 IDOA and for the duration of this Rollback, the TCID shall remain in force except for Appendix D which shall be suspended.
Rollback. Licensee will keep at least one level of rollback whenever possible to allow undoing any patch, update or upgrade deployed by Licensee.
