Common use of Risk Clause in Contracts

Risk. The State shall be at risk for the per capita cost (as determined by the method described below) for Demonstration eligibles under this budget neutrality agreement, but not for the number of Demonstration eligibles in each of the groups. By providing FFP for all Demonstration eligibles, the State shall not be at risk for changing economic conditions that impact enrollment levels. However, by placing the State at risk for the per capita costs for Demonstration eligibles under this agreement, CMS assures that Federal Demonstration expenditures do not exceed the level of expenditures that would have occurred had there been no Demonstration.

Risk. The State state shall be at risk for the per capita cost (as determined by the method described below) for Demonstration demonstration eligibles under this budget neutrality agreement, but not for the number of Demonstration demonstration eligibles in each of the groups. By providing FFP for all Demonstration demonstration eligibles, the State state shall not be at risk for changing economic conditions that impact enrollment levels. However, by placing the State state at risk for the per capita costs for Demonstration demonstration eligibles under this agreement, CMS assures that Federal Demonstration demonstration expenditures do not exceed the level of expenditures that would have occurred had there been no Demonstrationdemonstration.

Risk. The State state shall be at risk for the per capita cost (as determined by the method described below) for Demonstration demonstration eligibles under this budget neutrality agreementlimit, but not for the number of Demonstration eligibles in each of the groupsdemonstration eligibles. By providing FFP for all Demonstration demonstration eligibles, the State state shall not be at risk for changing economic conditions that impact enrollment levels. However, by placing the State state at risk for the per capita costs for Demonstration eligibles under this agreementof the demonstration populations, CMS assures that Federal Demonstration the federal demonstration expenditures do not exceed the level of expenditures that would have occurred been realized had there been no Demonstrationdemonstration.

Risk. The State state shall be at risk for the per capita cost (as determined by the method described below) for Demonstration eligibles demonstration eliglbes under this budget neutrality agreement, but not for the number of Demonstration demonstration eligibles in each of the groups. By providing FFP for all Demonstration demonstration eligibles, the State The state shall not be at risk for changing economic conditions that impact enrollment levels. However, by placing the State state at risk for the per capita costs for Demonstration demonstration eligibles under this agreement, CMS assures that Federal Demonstration federal demonstration expenditures do not exceed the level of expenditures that would have occurred had there been no Demonstrationdemonstration.

Risk. The State shall be at risk for the per capita cost (as determined by the method described below) for of Demonstration eligibles enrollees under this budget neutrality agreement, but not for the number of Demonstration eligibles in each of the groupsenrollees. By providing FFP for all Demonstration eligiblesenrollees, the State shall will not be at risk for changing economic conditions that which impact enrollment levels. However, by placing the State at risk for the per capita costs for Demonstration eligibles under this agreementenrollees, CMS assures that the Federal Demonstration expenditures do not exceed the level of expenditures that would have occurred had there been no Demonstration.

Risk. The State shall be at risk for the per capita cost (as determined by the method described below) for Demonstration eligibles under this budget neutrality agreement, but not for the number of Demonstration eligibles in each of the groups. By providing FFP for all Demonstration eligibles, the The State shall not be at risk for changing economic conditions that impact enrollment levels. However, by placing the The State at risk for the per capita costs for Demonstration eligibles under this agreement, CMS assures that Federal Demonstration expenditures do not exceed the level of expenditures that would have occurred had there been no Demonstration.

Risk. The State state shall be at risk for the per capita cost (as determined by the method described below) for Demonstration eligibles demonstration enrollees under this budget neutrality agreement, but not for the number of Demonstration eligibles demonstration enrollees in each of the groupsTEFRA eligibility group. By providing FFP for all Demonstration eligiblesdemonstration enrollees, the State shall state will not be at risk for changing economic conditions that which impact enrollment levels. However, by placing the State state at risk for the per capita costs for Demonstration eligibles under this agreementdemonstration enrollees, CMS assures that Federal Demonstration the federal demonstration expenditures do not exceed the level of expenditures that would have occurred had there been no Demonstrationdemonstration.

Risk. The State state shall be at risk for the per capita cost (as determined by the method described below) for Demonstration eligibles under this budget neutrality agreement, but not for the number of Demonstration eligibles in each of the groups. By providing FFP for all Demonstration eligibles, the State The state shall not be at risk for changing economic conditions that impact enrollment levels. However, by placing the State state at risk for the per capita costs for Demonstration eligibles under this agreement, CMS assures that Federal federal Demonstration expenditures do not exceed the level of expenditures that would have occurred had there been no Demonstration.