Review/Evaluation Sample Clauses

A Review/Evaluation clause establishes a process for periodically assessing the performance, progress, or compliance of one or both parties under an agreement. Typically, this clause outlines the timing, criteria, and methods for conducting such reviews, such as scheduled meetings, submission of reports, or performance metrics. Its core practical function is to ensure ongoing accountability and provide opportunities to address issues or make improvements during the term of the contract.
Review/Evaluation. Department Chairpersons will coordinate the Department review/evaluation process for non-probationary and probationary Employees, including part-time Faculty, according to the process defined in Article 10, Professional Reviews and Evaluations, of this Agreement.
View SourceView Similar (3)
Review/Evaluation i) Conduct a full review of the causes and effectiveness of the response to the breach complied and reported to the board of Directors.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Review/Evaluation. The project will be evaluated towards the end of the 2005/6 financial year. Safer York Partnership will help coordinate this evaluation on behalf of City of York Council and North Yorkshire Police (using existing consultation mechanisms and budgets as far as possible). The evaluation would be based on the following key outcomes: • Reduction in the fear of crime locally • Resident satisfaction with the service • Visibility / recognition of the service locally • Attendance at ▇▇▇▇ meetings and events • Reduction in anti social behaviour and nuisance behaviour locally
View Source
Review/Evaluation. Missions
View Source
Review/Evaluation. AND PURCHASE OF THE ASSETS -------------------------------------------------------- 2.1 SRC purchased the Assets with the prior approval of the Participants. This Agreement shall not be construed as creating an exclusive right of any Participant to participate in funding the purchase of any particular assets in the future if the Parties fail to agree on the terms of a bid to purchase such assets or the terms of a servicing agreement with respect thereto; provided, however, that SRC does commit to sell participations to Mahaska Investment Company ("MIC"), or its related or affiliated entities to the extent they have funds available for such purchases if this same Servicing Agreement is implemented and the terms of the bid are agreed to by SRC and MIC or such related or affiliated entity. In order to provide SRC with the ability to plan purchases of assets, MIC and its related and affiliated entities shall provide SRC with a statement each month of the funds they will have available for the purchase of participation interests in assets purchased by SRC during the following sixty (60) day period. SRC shall periodically provide to Participants relevant information about prospective Asset acquisitions to permit Participants the opportunity to anticipate and plan for future capital needs. 2.2 The Participants acknowledge and agree that SRC's assessment of the value of the Assets was a matter of judgment and that SRC shall not be liable to the Participants for any errors in judgment in valuing the Assets. 2.3 The costs actually incurred by SRC in evaluating the Assets including any fee charged by Seller for reviewing the Assets (Costs Reimbursement) shall be expensed by SRC as part of SRC's costs to be reimbursed as provided by Section 6.2. 2.4 SRC will not receive any compensation for the evaluation of the Assets separate from the compensation set out in this Agreement. 2.5 MIC has already approved the bids submitted by SRC to Sellers for the purchase of certain Assets as evidenced by copies of the Agreements and Certificates of Participation attached hereto as Exhibits 1 through 7. The MIC has funded the purchase of the Assets by paying the purchase price (bid amount) to Seller required by the terms of the Loan Sale Agreement between SRC and Sellers. MIC has purchased a participation representing a 100% participation interest in the Assets. 2.6 SRC shall not purchase a specific group of Assets without the prior approval of the Participants who are going to part...
View Source

Related to Review/Evaluation

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

  • JOC EVALUATION If any materials being utilized for a project cannot be found in the RS Means Price Book, this question is what is the markup percentage on those materials? When answering this question please insert the number that represents your percentage of proposed markup. Example: if you are proposing a 30 percent markup, please insert the number "30". Remember that this is a ceiling markup. You may markup a lesser percentage to the TIPS Member customer when pricing the project, but not a greater percentage. EXAMPLE: You need special materials that are not in the RS Means Unit Price Book for a project. You would buy the materials and ▇▇▇▇ them up to the TIPS Member customer by the percentage you propose in this question. If the materials cost you, the contractor, $100 and you proposed a markup on this question for the material of 30 percent, then you would charge the TIPS Member customer $130 for the materials. TIPS/ESC Region 8 is required by Texas Government Code § 791 to be compensated for its work and thus, failure to agree shall render your response void and it will not be considered. Vendor agrees to remit to TIPS the required administration fee or, if resellers are named, guarantee the fee remittance by or for the reseller named by the vendor?

  • Final Evaluation IC must submit a final report and a project evaluation to the Arts Commission within thirty (30) days after the completion of the Services. Any and all unexpended funds from IC must be returned to City no later than sixty (60) days after the completion of the Services.

  • PROGRESS EVALUATION Engineer shall, from time to time during the progress of the Engineering Services, confer with County at County’s election. Engineer shall prepare and present such information as may be pertinent and necessary, or as may be reasonably requested by County, in order for County to evaluate features of the Engineering Services. At the request of County or Engineer, conferences shall be provided at Engineer's office, the offices of County, or at other locations designated by County. When requested by County, such conferences shall also include evaluation of the Engineering Services. County may, from time to time, require Engineer to appear and provide information to the Williamson County Commissioners Court. Should County determine that the progress in Engineering Services does not satisfy an applicable Work Authorization or any Supplemental Work Authorization related thereto, then County shall review same with Engineer to determine corrective action required. Engineer shall promptly advise County in writing of events which have or may have a significant impact upon the progress of the Engineering Services, including but not limited to the following: A. Problems, delays, adverse conditions which may materially affect the ability to meet the objectives of an applicable Work Authorization or any Supplemental Work Authorization related thereto, or preclude the attainment of Project Engineering Services units by established time periods; and such disclosure shall be accompanied by statement of actions taken or contemplated, and County assistance needed to resolve the situation, if any; and B. Favorable developments or events which enable meeting goals sooner than anticipated in relation to an applicable Work Authorization’s or any Supplemental Work Authorization related thereto.

  • BID EVALUATION The Commissioner reserves the right to accept or reject any and all Bids, or separable portions of Bids, and waive technicalities, irregularities, and omissions if the Commissioner determines the best interests of the State will be served. The Commissioner, in his/her sole discretion, may accept or reject illegible, incomplete or vague Bids and his/her decision shall be final. A conditional or revocable Bid which clearly communicates the terms or limitations of acceptance may be considered, and Contract award may be made in compliance with the Bidder’s conditional or revocable terms in the Bid.