Qualitative Feedback Clause Samples

The Qualitative Feedback clause establishes a process for providing non-numerical, descriptive evaluations regarding performance, deliverables, or services under the agreement. Typically, this clause outlines how parties can share observations, suggestions, or concerns in narrative form, either periodically or after specific milestones. Its core function is to facilitate open communication and continuous improvement by allowing parties to address issues or highlight strengths that may not be captured by quantitative metrics alone.
Qualitative Feedback. The following questions will also be asked to the participants in the form of conversational feedback.  Using the system enhances your effectiveness on the carrying out of your daily life?  Using the system enables you to accomplish your daily tasks more easy?  Do you find the system useful?  Is the interaction with the system clear and understandable? The Business Strategy Report (D7.4b) lists a number of benefits and USP’s of the VSP. These can differ per stakeholder (end user, formal or informal caregivers, insurance companies, governments, relatives of system integrators/producers). Whether stakeholders are willing to pay for or invest in the solutions developed within Miraculous- Life, depends on the value offered by these products and services. In a number of cases it is possible to quantify these benefits by looking at the economic value which they generate. A number of the objectives as specified within this deliverable can offer direct or indirect financial benefits if they are met. In this paragraph we propose a set of objectives that can be used to create an estimate of the economic value generated by the solutions developed within Miraculous-Life. In the next version of the Business Strategy Report and Exploitation Plan (D7.4b) we plan to use these results to actually create an estimate of the potential economic value. Whether the objectives are met or not, will be based on a series of success indicators. At this moment we suggest to use the following success indicators for the economic evaluation:  Objective 1: Stimulate and motivate the elder to remain longer active at home through a virtual partner support.
Qualitative Feedback of Children and other Stakeholders who confirm that the Child has been 100% encouraged to personalise their room to reflect their taste and interests.
Qualitative Feedback. In the questionnaire, subjects were asked to provide qualitative feedback regarding the visual appearance of the software agree- ments and their overall informativeness. A number of comments suggest the techniques worked as intended. For example, a partici- pant in the heavy condition commented: A participant in the moderate condition suggests the effectiveness of the documents’ pacing:
Qualitative Feedback of Children and other Stakeholders who confirm the Child is making 100% demonstrable progress in acquiring independence skills in line with the pathway plan.
Qualitative Feedback. As in experiment 1, qualitative feedback was collected in a ques- tionnaire and a post-task interview. In particular, participants were asked why they read less, more, or the same amount of content in comparison to their normal behaviour when installing software. Participants in the control condition all responded that they read the same amount as usual, and often made comments such as, “All of the EULAs are basically the same,” or, “The same amount was read, since they generally all say the same things.” By contrast, a number of participants in the textured condition stated they read more content than usual, and cited elements of the agreements that pulled them in; for example: Both in written responses and during interviews, participants in the textured condition noted being pulled in by prominent elements at the top of the document—such as the pull-quote mentioned in the above quotation (Figure 5), or a vignette serving a similar purpose (Figure 6)—and then were compelled to continue reading further into the document. These findings provide evidence that such atten- tion-grabbing embellishments can pull participants into the content of the rest of the document.
Qualitative Feedback of Children who know what they would like to do when they leave school and 100% care, and are working towards achieving these ambitions.

Related to Qualitative Feedback

  • Quantitative Analysis Quantitative analysts develop and apply financial models designed to enable equity portfolio managers and fundamental analysts to screen potential and current investments, assess relative risk and enhance performance relative to benchmarks and peers. To the extent that such services are to be provided with respect to any Account which is a registered investment company, Categories 3, 4 and 5 above shall be treated as “investment advisory services” for purposes of Section 5(b) of the Agreement.”

  • Service Level Expectations Without limiting any other requirements of the Agreement, the Service Provider shall meet or exceed the following standards, policies, and guidelines:

  • Performance Expectations The Charter School’s performance in relation to the indicators, measures, metrics and targets set forth in the CPF shall provide the basis upon which the SCSC will decide whether to renew the Charter School’s Charter Contract at the end of the charter term. This section shall not preclude the SCSC from considering other relevant factors in making renewal decisions.

  • Metrics Institutional Metrics System-Wide Metrics

  • Performance Monitoring ‌ A. Performance Monitoring of Subrecipient by County, State of California and/or HUD shall consist of requested and/or required written reporting, as well as onsite monitoring by County, State of California or HUD representatives. B. County shall periodically evaluate Subrecipient’s progress in complying with the terms of this Contract. Subrecipient shall cooperate fully during such monitoring. County shall report the findings of each monitoring to Subrecipient. C. County shall monitor the performance of Subrecipient against the goals, outcomes, milestones and performance standards required herein. Substandard performance, as determined by County, will constitute non-compliance with this Contract for which County may immediately terminate the Contract. If action to correct such substandard performance is not taken by Subrecipient within the time period specified by County, payment(s) will be denied in accordance with the provisions contained in this Paragraph 47 of this Contract. D. HUD in accordance with 24 CFR Part 570 Subpart O, 570.902, will annually review the performance of County to determine whether County has carried out its Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) assisted activities in a timely manner and has significantly disbursed CDBG funds and met the mandated “1.5 ratio” threshold. Subrecipient is responsible to ensure timely drawdown of funds.