PROJECT DISCUSSION Clause Samples

PROJECT DISCUSSION. Users could post a discussion and replies on Project Environment prior and after the meeting to obtain clarification and more information for the project. Daily summary notification would be emailed to users for any new posts or replies.
View SourceView Similar (2)
PROJECT DISCUSSION. Continued discussion on fire hall project design adjustments o Kirvanek and Waldorf toured 2 different recent builds in the Alexandria Area, with ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ (County Commissioner) and ▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ (CFD) ▪ Quality Equipment ▪ 15,000 Sq Ft ▪ Membrane roof, not a cement roof ▪ Around $2 million ▪ Sheriffs Department Douglass County – Boat and Water Building ▪ Started at 16,800 sq feet ▪ 26 overhead doors ▪ 4.2 million ▪ Wood frame building and trusses, Metal sided and has a wash bay ▪ Very similar, but no hose tower. • Mod, from Feders Architects gave a presentation, has worked with City of Alexandria and other local projects. o Offered different solutions, to make it more cost effective. o Gave suggestions about functionality and potentially unnecessary space o If worried about building an effective space decrease building size and think differently. o Works with Contegrity Group for construction management • What are our current options: o Stay with ▇▇▇▇▇▇ and ▇▇▇▇ – make them cut the project down, and pay them more o Fire ▇▇▇▇▇▇ and go with another firm o Consider ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ plans, which would cost around $30,000 to update, based off of 2011 plans. • If project cost got down to 3.5 million. The cost to ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Township numbers = numbers change to • What’s the longevity of precast vs. pre-engineered steel – o Fab-con (Quality Equipment building is made out of this) • NEXT STEPS: o Conversation with ▇▇▇▇▇▇ and ▇▇▇▇ to get cost down or consider other options.
View Source

Related to PROJECT DISCUSSION

  • Mutual Discussions The Employer and the Union acknowledge the mutual benefits to be derived from dialogue between the parties and are prepared to discuss matters of common interest.

  • Discussion Staff has reviewed the proposal relative to all relevant policies and advise that it is reasonably consistent with the intent of the MPS. Attachment B provides an evaluation of the proposed development agreement in relation to the relevant MPS policies.

  • Informal Discussion If an employee has a problem relating to a work situation, the employee is encouraged to request a meeting with his or her immediate supervisor to discuss the problem in an effort to clarify the issue and to work cooperatively towards settlement.

  • Informal Discussions Before a written grievance is submitted, informal discussions will take place between the aggrieved party, the principal or supervisor and Education Minnesota – OSSEO representative. Through these discussions the parties will attempt to resolve the problem. Subd. 2. Level I: If the grievance is not resolved through informal discussions, the aggrieved party may submit the grievance in writing to the principal or supervisor. A copy of such written grievance must simultaneously be filed with Human Resources. The Director, Human Resources will set a meeting date within five (5) days of receipt of the written grievance. The Director, Human Resources will give a written decision on the grievance to the parties involved within ten (10) days after the meeting. Subd. 3. Level II: In the event the grievance is not resolved in Level I, the decision rendered may be appealed to the superintendent of schools, provided such appeal is made in writing within five (5) days after receipt of the decision in Level I. If a grievance is properly appealed to the superintendent, the superintendent or designee will set a time to meet regarding the grievance within fifteen (15) days after receipt of the appeal. Within ten (10) days after the meeting, the superintendent or designee will issue a decision in writing to the parties involved. Subd. 4. Level III: In the event the grievance is not resolved in Level II, the decision rendered may be appealed to the School Board, provided such appeal is made in writing within five (5) days after receipt of the decision in Level II. If a grievance is properly appealed to the School Board, the School Board will set a time to hear the grievance within twenty (20) days after the receipt of the appeal. Within twenty (20) days after the meeting, the School Board will issue its decision in writing to the parties involved. At the option of the School Board, a committee or representative(s) of the School Board may be designated by the School Board to hear the appeal at this level and report its findings and recommendations to the School Board. The School Board will then render its decision.

  • Settlement Discussions This Agreement is part of a proposed settlement of matters that could otherwise be the subject of litigation among the Parties hereto. Nothing herein shall be deemed an admission of any kind. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 408 and any applicable state rules of evidence, this Agreement and all negotiations relating thereto shall not be admissible into evidence in any proceeding other than to prove the existence of this Agreement or in a proceeding to enforce the terms of this Agreement.