Common use of PROGRESS EVALUATION Clause in Contracts

PROGRESS EVALUATION. Evaluation of successful progress through the Mechanic-Rigger Apprentice Program consists of two criteria. The first is academic achievement evaluated by quizzes, tests, and exams. The second is hourly OJT requirements as stated in Section IV of this document. Periodic tests and reviews will be held for the purpose of evaluating overall progress and determining success within the program. If academic progress becomes unsatisfactory, below the minimum level of 70%, the ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇/instructor will review performance and recommend steps for remediation. It is recognized that it may not be possible to attain the scheduled OJT hours due to plant evolutions or training availability in a particular area. Should the Apprentice fail to complete the scheduled hours, they may be made up at a later date. Satisfactory completion of the Apprentice Program requires completing the total OJT hours as shown in Section V.B, General Program Schedule. After a failure of a test or exam, line supervision will be notified, and the Apprentice shall be offered remediation and allowed to retake the test. Two additional tests shall be allowed at line supervision discretion. Academic failure will be addressed per Section F of the Company-Union agreement. The above shall also apply to hourly requirements of OJT given in conjunction with academic training. Records of progress will be kept and reviewed as part of the evaluation process. If an Apprentice does not maintain an acceptable OJT and academic work level, notice shall be given to the Union’s Business Representative or their designee. Progress to the next higher wage step, or demotion, shall be in accordance with Paragraphs F3, 4, 5, and 6 of the Master Apprenticeship Agreement. An Apprentice shall not be held back from the next higher wage step because the necessary academic training was not provided prior to one of these steps.

PROGRESS EVALUATION. Evaluation of successful progress through the Mechanic-Rigger Instrument Repairman Apprentice Program consists of two criteria. The first is academic achievement evaluated by quizzes, tests, tests and exams. The second is hourly recommended OJT requirements as stated in Section IV of this document. Periodic tests and reviews will be held for the purpose of evaluating overall progress and determining success within the program. If academic progress becomes unsatisfactory, below the minimum level of 70%, the ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇/instructor will review performance and recommend steps for remediation. It is recognized that it may not be possible to attain the scheduled OJT hours due to plant evolutions or training availability in a particular area. Should the Apprentice fail to complete the scheduled hours, they may be made up at a later date. Satisfactory completion of the Apprentice Program requires completing the total OJT hours as shown in Section V.BV.B., General Program Schedule. After a failure of a test or exam, line supervision will be notified, and the Apprentice shall be offered remediation and allowed to retake the test. Two additional tests shall be allowed at line supervision discretion. Academic failure will be addressed per Section F SECTIONF of the Company-Union agreementUnionAgreement. The above shall also apply to hourly requirements of OJT given in conjunction with academic training. Records of progress will be kept and reviewed as part of the evaluation process. If an Apprentice does not maintain an acceptable OJT and academic work and OJT level, notice shall be given to the Union’s 's Business Representative or their designee. Progress to the next higher wage step, or demotion, shall be in accordance with Paragraphs F3, 4, 5, and 6 of the Master Apprenticeship Agreement. An Apprentice shall not be held back from the next higher wage step because the necessary academic necessaryacademic training was not provided prior to one of these steps.

PROGRESS EVALUATION. Evaluation of successful progress through the Mechanic-Rigger Instrument Repairman Apprentice Program consists of two criteria. The first is academic achievement evaluated by quizzes, tests, tests and exams. The second is hourly recommended OJT requirements as stated in Section IV of this document. Periodic tests and reviews will be held for the purpose of evaluating overall progress and determining success within the program. If academic progress becomes unsatisfactory, below the minimum level of 70%, the ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇/instructor will review performance and recommend steps for remediation. It is recognized that it may not be possible to attain the scheduled OJT hours due to plant evolutions or training availability in a particular area. Should the Apprentice fail to complete the scheduled hours, they may be made up at a later date. Satisfactory completion of the Apprentice Program requires completing the total OJT hours as shown in Section V.BV.B., General Program Schedule. After a failure of a test or exam, line supervision will be notified, and the Apprentice shall be offered remediation and allowed to retake the test. Two additional tests shall be allowed at line supervision discretion. Academic failure will be addressed per Section ▇▇▇▇▇ F of the Company-Union agreementAgreement, Master Apprenticeship Agreement. The above shall also apply to hourly requirements of OJT given in conjunction with academic training. Records of progress will be kept and reviewed as part of the evaluation process. If an Apprentice does not maintain an acceptable OJT and academic work and OJT level, notice shall be given to the Union’s 's Business Representative or their designee. Progress to the next higher wage step, or demotion, shall be in accordance with Paragraphs F3, 4, 5, and 6 of the Master Apprenticeship Agreement. An Apprentice shall not be held back from the next higher wage step because the necessary academic training was not provided prior to one of these steps.