PROFITABILITY RATIO Sample Clauses

PROFITABILITY RATIO. Net Income (prior three fiscal quarters) $ Net Income (fiscal quarter just ended) $ Total Net Income (prior four fiscal quarters) $ Minimum required $ 1.00 or more In compliance? ¨Yes ¨No
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
PROFITABILITY RATIO. Net Income (fiscal quarter just ended) $___________ Net Income (prior fiscal quarter) $___________ Minimum required: Commencing with the fiscal quarter ending September 30, 2019, Seller shall not permit its Covenant Net Income to be (i) less than $1.00 for two (2) consecutive quarters, or (ii) commencing with the fiscal quarter beginning July 1, 2019, a loss exceeding $10,000,000 In compliance? ☐Yes ☐No

Related to PROFITABILITY RATIO

  • Profitability The Board reviewed detailed information regarding revenues received by XXXX under the Agreement. The Board considered the estimated costs to XXXX, and pre-tax profits realized by XXXX, from advising the DWS Funds, as well as estimates of the pre-tax profits attributable to managing the Fund in particular. The Board also received information regarding the estimated enterprise-wide profitability of DIMA and its affiliates with respect to all fund services in totality and by fund. The Board and the Fee Consultant reviewed XXXX’s methodology in allocating its costs to the management of the Fund. Based on the information provided, the Board concluded that the pre-tax profits realized by XXXX in connection with the management of the Fund were not unreasonable. The Board also reviewed certain publicly available information regarding the profitability of certain similar investment management firms. The Board noted that, while information regarding the profitability of such firms is limited (and in some cases is not necessarily prepared on a comparable basis), DIMA and its affiliates’ overall profitability with respect to the DWS Funds (after taking into account distribution and other services provided to the funds by XXXX and its affiliates) was lower than the overall profitability levels of most comparable firms for which such data was available. Economies of Scale. The Board considered whether there are economies of scale with respect to the management of the Fund and whether the Fund benefits from any economies of scale. The Board noted that the Fund’s investment management fee schedule includes fee breakpoints. The Board concluded that the Fund’s fee schedule represents an appropriate sharing between the Fund and DIMA of such economies of scale as may exist in the management of the Fund at current asset levels.

  • EBITDA The term “EBITDA” shall mean, with respect to any fiscal period, “Consolidated EBITDA” as defined in the Credit Agreement, provided that the following should also be excluded from the calculation of EBITDA to the extent not already excluded from the calculation of Consolidated EBITDA under the Credit Agreement: (i) Non-Cash Charges (as defined in the Credit Agreement) related to any issuances of equity securities; (ii) fees and expenses relating to the Acquisition; (iii) financing fees (both cash and non-cash) relating to the Acquisition; (iv) covenant-not-to-compete payments to certain members of the Company’s senior management and related expenses; (v) expenses (or any portion thereof) incurred outside of the ordinary course of business that are approved by the Board which the Board determines in its good faith discretion are in the best interest of the Company but which will have a disproportionately adverse impact on the Company’s short term financial performance, affecting the Company’s ability to achieve financial targets related to the vesting of the Class C Units under the Incentive Unit Subscription Agreements or the Company’s annual bonus plan; (vi) costs and expenses incurred in connection with evaluating and consummating acquisitions not contemplated by the Company’s annual plan, as such plan is approved by the Board in good faith; (vii) related party expenditures that are subject to the prior written consent of the Majority Executives pursuant to Section 2.3(a) of the Securityholders Agreement but have failed to receive such consent; (viii) advisors’ fees and expenses incurred outside the ordinary course of business related solely to Vestar’s activities that are unrelated to the Company; (ix) costs associated with any put option or call option contemplated by any Rollover Subscription Agreement or Incentive Unit Subscription Agreement; (x) costs associated with any proposed initial Public Offering or Sale of the Company (as such terms are defined in the Securityholders Agreement); (xi) expenses related to any litigation arising from the Acquisition; (x) management fees and costs related to the activities giving rise to such fees that are paid to, paid for or reimbursed to Vestar and its Affiliates; and (xii) material expenditures or incremental expenditures inconsistent with prior practice (to the extent that prior practice is relevant) required by Board (where Management Managers (as defined in the Securityholders Agreement) unanimously dissent) unless such expenditures are reasonably likely to result in any benefit (whether economic or non-economic) to the Company as determined by the Board in its good faith discretion.

  • Maximum Total Leverage Ratio Permit the Total Leverage Ratio of Borrower on a Consolidated Basis, measured for each period of four consecutive fiscal quarters, on the last day of each fiscal quarter (each a “Measurement Date”), to be greater than the ratio set forth below for the corresponding period at any time: Period Ratio Closing Date through September 30, 2017 5.00:1.00 December 31, 2017 through March 31, 2018 4.75:1.00 June 30, 2018 through September 30, 2018 4.50:1.00 December 31, 2018 through March 31, 2019 4.25:1.00 June 30, 2019 and thereafter 4.00:1.00

  • Total Net Leverage Ratio Maintain as of the end of each fiscal quarter, a Total Net Leverage Ratio for Quantum and its Subsidiaries, on a consolidated basis, of not greater than the ratio set forth below for each four (4) consecutive fiscal quarter period then ended set forth below: Fiscal Quarter Ending Maximum Total Net Leverage Ratio September 30, 2021 4.25:1.00 December 31, 2021 4.25:1.00 March 31, 2022 Not Tested June 30, 2022 3.50:1.00 September 30, 2022 3.50:1.00 December 31, 2022 3.50:1.00 March 31, 2023 3.50:1.00 June 30, 2023 3.00:1.00 September 30, 2023 3.00:1.00 December 31, 2023 3.00:1.00 March 31, 2024 3.00:1.00 June 30, 2024 3.00:1.00 September 30, 2024 3.00:1.00 December 31, 2024 3.00:1.00 March 31, 2025 3.00:1.00 June 30, 2025 3.00:1.00 December 31, 2025 and each fiscal quarter ending thereafter 3.00:1.00”

  • Quick Ratio A ratio of Quick Assets to Current Liabilities of at least 2.00 to 1.00.

  • Consolidated Total Leverage Ratio Permit the Consolidated Total Leverage Ratio as of the end of any fiscal quarter of Holdings to be greater than 2.50 to 1.00.

  • Adjusted EBITDA The 2019 adjusted EBITDA for the Affiliated Club Sellers shall total an aggregate of not less than $10,700,000.

  • Minimum Consolidated Net Worth The Company will not permit its Consolidated Net Worth at any time to be less than the sum of (a) $800,000,000 plus (b) an aggregate amount equal to 50% of its Consolidated Net Earnings (but, in each case, only if a positive number) for each completed fiscal year beginning with the fiscal year ending September 30, 2013.”

  • Total Leverage Ratio The Borrowers will not permit the Total Leverage Ratio on the last day of any fiscal quarter to exceed 3.75 to 1.00.

  • Minimum Consolidated EBITDA (a) The Borrower will not permit Consolidated EBITDA (i) for the Borrower's fiscal quarter ending closest to June 30, 1997 to be less than $2,500,000 and (ii) for any Test Period ending on the last day of a fiscal quarter of the Borrower set forth below to be less than the amount set forth opposite such fiscal quarter below: Fiscal Quarter Ending Closest To Amount ----------------- ------ September 30, 1997 $5,000,000 December 31, 1997 $5,000,000 March 31, 1998 $5,000,000 June 30, 1998 $5,000,000 September 30, 1998 $5,000,000 December 31, 1998 $5,000,000 March 31, 1999 $5,000,000 June 30, 1999 $5,000,000 -64- September 30, 1999 $ 5,000,000 December 31, 1999 $ 5,000,000 March 31, 2000 $ 5,000,000 June 30, 2000 $10,000,000 September 30, 2000 $15,000,000 December 31, 2000 $15,000,000 March 31, 2001 $15,000,000 June 30, 2001 $15,750,000 September 30, 2001 $16,500,000 December 31, 2001 $16,500,000 March 31, 2002 $16,500,000 June 30, 2002 $16,500,000

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.