Common use of POSITIONS OF THE PARTIES Clause in Contracts

POSITIONS OF THE PARTIES. No party contended that this Agreement is discriminatory or contrary to the public interest. Staff reviewed the Agreement in the context of the criteria contained in Section 252(e)(2)(A) of the Act and determined that it met the necessary requirements. Under this Section, the Commission may reject an agreement, or any portion thereof, adopted by negotiation under Subsection (a) only if it finds that (i) the agreement, or a portion thereof, discriminates against as telecommunications carrier not a party to the agreement; or (ii) the implementation of such an agreement, or a portion thereof, is not consistent with the public interest, convenience and necessity. Xx. Xxxxxxx stated that the Agreement meets the standards set forth in the Telecommunications Act of 1996 and is consistent with the public interest, convenience and necessity. Staff recommended that the Agreement be approved by the Commission, for the reasons set forth in the Verified Statement of Xx. Xxxxxxx. There are no contested issues in this docket.

POSITIONS OF THE PARTIES. No party contended that this Agreement the Amendment is discriminatory or contrary to the public interest. Staff reviewed the Agreement Amendment in the context of the criteria contained in Section 252(e)(2)(A) of the Act and determined that it met the necessary requirements. Under this Section, the Commission may reject an agreement, or any portion thereof, adopted by negotiation under Subsection (a) only if it finds that (i) the agreement, or a portion thereof, discriminates against as a telecommunications carrier not a party to the agreement; or (ii) the implementation of such an agreement, or a portion thereof, is not consistent with the public interest, convenience and necessity. Xx. Staff Witness Xxxxxxx stated opined that the Agreement Amendment meets the standards set forth in the Telecommunications Act of 1996 and is consistent with the public interest, convenience and necessity. Staff recommended that the Agreement Amendment be approved by the Commission, for the reasons set forth in the Verified Statement of Xx. X. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx. There are no contested issues in this docket.

POSITIONS OF THE PARTIES. No party contended that this Agreement the Amendment is discriminatory or contrary to the public interest. Staff reviewed the Agreement Amendment in the context of the criteria contained in Section 252(e)(2)(A) of the Act and determined that it met the necessary requirements. Under this Section, the Commission may reject an agreement, or any portion thereof, adopted by negotiation under Subsection (a) only if it finds that (i) the agreement, or a portion thereof, discriminates against as a telecommunications carrier not a party to the agreement; or (ii) the implementation of such an agreement, or a portion thereof, is not consistent with the public interest, convenience convenience, and necessity. Xx. Xxxxxxx stated opined that the Agreement Amendment meets the standards set forth in the Telecommunications Act of 1996 and is consistent with the public interest, convenience and necessity. Staff recommended that the Agreement Amendment be approved by the Commission, for the reasons set forth in the Verified Statement of Xx. X. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx. There are no No issues were contested issues in this docketDocket.

POSITIONS OF THE PARTIES. No party contended that this the Agreement is discriminatory or contrary to the public interest. Staff reviewed the Agreement in the context of the criteria contained in Section 252(e)(2)(A) of the Act and determined that it met the necessary requirements. Under this Section, the Commission may reject an agreement, or any portion thereof, adopted by negotiation under Subsection (a) only if it finds that (i) the agreement, or a portion thereof, discriminates against as a telecommunications carrier not a party to the agreement; or (ii) the implementation of such an agreement, or a portion thereof, is not consistent with the public p ublic interest, convenience convenience, and necessity. Xx. Xxxxxxx stated opined that the Agreement meets the standards set forth in the Telecommunications Act of 1996 and is consistent with the public interest, convenience and necessity. Staff recommended that the Agreement be approved by the Commission, for the reasons set forth in the Verified Statement of Xx. X. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx. There are no No issues were contested issues in this docketDocket.

POSITIONS OF THE PARTIES. No party contended that this Agreement is discriminatory or contrary to the public interest. Staff reviewed the Agreement in the context of the criteria contained in Section 252(e)(2)(A) of the Act and determined that it met the necessary requirements. Under this Section, the Commission may reject an agreement, or any portion thereof, adopted by negotiation under Subsection (a) only if it finds that (i) the agreement, or a portion thereof, discriminates against as telecommunications carrier not a party to the agreement; or (ii) the implementation of such an agreement, or a portion thereof, is not consistent with the public interest, convenience and necessity. Xx. Xxxxxxx stated that the Agreement meets the standards set forth in the Telecommunications Act of 1996 and is consistent with the public interest, convenience and necessity. Staff recommended that the Agreement Amendment be approved by the Commission, for the reasons set forth in the Verified Statement of Xx. Xxxxxxx. There are no contested issues in this docket.