Common use of Outfall Clause in Contracts

Outfall. Grading Sheets (1 each) w/Prop Contours and Cross Sections (~4 Xsecs) 2 4 2 16 32 54 $ 7,710.00 6.3 Coordination 2 4 6 $ 1,750.00 SUBTOTAL 13 4 34 15 150 82 $ 66,885.00 ORIGINAL CONTRACT UPDATED CONTRACT TASK DESIGN FEE TASK DESIGN FEE DIFFERENCE IN DESIGN FEE/ SUPPLEMENTAL DESIGN FEE FC 102 - FEASIBILITY STUDIES - DATA COLLECTION $10,342.95 SAME AS ORIGINAL $10,342.95 $0.00 FC 102 - FEASIBILITY STUDIES - TRAFFIC & OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS $144,959.53 SAME AS ORIGINAL $144,959.53 $0.00 FC 162 - TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT STUDIES $27,697.52 SAME AS ORIGINAL $27,697.52 $0.00 ORIGINAL CONTRACT UPDATED CONTRACT TASK DESIGN FEE TASK DESIGN FEE DIFFERENCE IN DESIGN FEE/ SUPPLEMENTAL DESIGN FEE FC 102 - FEASIBILITY STUDIES - DATA COLLECTION ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ added $2,088.00 $2,088.00 FC 162 - TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT STUDIES ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ added $5,558.00 $5,558.00 FC 162 - TEMPORARY TRAFFIC SIGNAL DESIGN NONE $0.00 3 INTERSECTIONS $37,582.58 $37,582.58 FC 162 - PERMANENT TRAFFIC SIGNAL DESIGN 5 INTERSECTIONS $136,570.03 7 INTERSECTIONS $201,603.95 $65,033.92 FC 163- ILLUMINATION (CONTINUOUS LIGHTING) ALONG THE SEGMENT $77,762.50 TASK REMOVED $0.00 ‐$77,762.50 FC 165 - TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS (PERMANENT) ALL ITS COMPONENTS $70,213.69 SAME AS ORIGINAL $70,213.69 $0.00 DIRECT EXPENSES $1,453.78 SAME AS ORIGINAL $1,453.78 $0.00 TASK DESIGN FEE TASK DESIGN FEE DIFFERENCE IN DESIGN FEE FC 309 - CONSTRUCTION PHASE SERVICES $36,000.00 SAME AS ORIGINAL $36,000.00 $0.00 Proj Number: CSJ : ▇▇▇▇-▇▇-▇▇▇ PM: ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Roku Date: 8/2/2021 Principal Project Manager Sr. Project Engineer Project Engineer CADD Technician Admin Assist. Sub-total Man-hours Subtotal (cost $) Billing Rate per Hour $189.75 $179.63 $131.56 $125.24 $84.76 $65.78 PHASE 3 - CONSTRUCTION PHASE SERVICES 1 Review and Respond to Submittals / RFI's / RFP's / etc 2 2 8 12 $ 1,161.60 PHASE 3 EXPENSES 2 Site Visit $ - 3 Postage / Courier $ - 4 Printing / Copies $ - SUBTOTAL PHASE 3 EXPENSES $ - TOTAL PHASE 3 CONSTRUCTION PHASE SERVICES 2 2 8 12 $ 1,161.60 June 23, 2022 Mr. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇, PE Proposal No.: P-EE 2218606-G Project Manager Sent Via Email: ▇▇▇▇▇@▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ and ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇ ▇▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇ Dear ▇▇. ▇▇▇▇▇: Earth Engineering, Inc. is pleased to present this proposal to perform a geotechnical evaluation for the above project in Sienna plantation, Texas. THIS PROPOSAL IS AN EXTENSION TO THE ORIGINAL PROPOSAL P-EE1925811- G DATED 11/22/2019. The scope of our services is presented below: • Drilling, sampling (3) borings to a depth of 20-feet in the additional detention pond. • Obtaining continuous soil samples to a depth of 12 feet, and then at five (5) foot intervals thereafter to the borings’ termination depths. • Earth Engineering will perform granular soil sampling utilizing the Standard Penetration Test (split spoon sampler) by driving. Blow counts will be recorded as produced by a 140-pound weight falling 30 inches (ASTM D-1558). Cohesive soils will be sampled using a thin-walled sampler (Shelby Tube) hydraulically pushed into the soil (ASTM D-1587). • Performing laboratory tests on selected representative soil samples to develop the engineering properties of the soil. These tests may include pocket penetrometers, unconfined compression, present moisture content, percent passing 200 sieves, dry densities, Atterberg Limits, and swell tests, as deemed appropriate. • Utilizing the results of observations both in the field and in limited laboratory tests, Earth Engineering will author a report that will include the following subjects: 1. soil stratigraphy: soil encountered up to 20 feet 2. groundwater conditions and groundwater control during construction 3. boring log information will include all laboratory test results and field observations