Outfall sewer from the collection system to the wastewater treatment facilities;
Outfall sewers from the wastewater treatment facilities to the point of discharge or disposal, and related works;
Outfall from a detention facility shall be discharged to a receiving channel, and energy dissipators shall be placed at the outfall of all detention facilities as necessary to provide a stabilized transition from the facility to the receiving channel.
Outfall. Improvements (Outfalls 2 & 3) (Lumpsum $18,010): As per the updated drainage report, outfalls 2 & 3 are proposed to be improved outside ROW for approximate distances of 400’ & 700’ respectively. The fee is based upon the following: Outfalls 2 & 3 Improvements:
Outfall. Grading Sheets (1 each) w/Prop Contours and Cross Sections (~4 Xsecs) 2 4 2 16 32 54 $ 7,710.00 6.3 Coordination 2 4 6 $ 1,750.00 SUBTOTAL 13 4 34 15 150 82 $ 66,885.00 TOTAL HOURS 4 34 15 150 82 TOTAL ESTIMATE $1,300 $9,350 $3,375 $26,250 $8,610 $ 66,885.00 TEDSI SUPPLEMENTAL WA #1 SCHEMATIC ENGINEERING ORIGINAL CONTRACT UPDATED CONTRACT TASK DESIGN FEE TASK DESIGN FEE DIFFERENCE IN DESIGN FEE/ SUPPLEMENTAL DESIGN FEE FC 102 - FEASIBILITY STUDIES - DATA COLLECTION $10,342.95 SAME AS ORIGINAL $10,342.95 $0.00 FC 102 - FEASIBILITY STUDIES - TRAFFIC & OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS $144,959.53 SAME AS ORIGINAL $144,959.53 $0.00 FC 162 - TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT STUDIES $27,697.52 SAME AS ORIGINAL $27,697.52 $0.00 TOTAL $183,000.00 $183,000.00 $0.00 WA #2 PS&E ENGINEERING ORIGINAL CONTRACT UPDATED CONTRACT TASK DESIGN FEE TASK DESIGN FEE DIFFERENCE IN DESIGN FEE/ SUPPLEMENTAL DESIGN FEE FC 102 - FEASIBILITY STUDIES - DATA COLLECTION Xxxxxxxxx added $2,088.00 $2,088.00 FC 162 - TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT STUDIES Xxxxxxxxx added $5,558.00 $5,558.00 FC 162 - TEMPORARY TRAFFIC SIGNAL DESIGN NONE $0.00 3 INTERSECTIONS $37,582.58 $37,582.58 FC 162 - PERMANENT TRAFFIC SIGNAL DESIGN 5 INTERSECTIONS $136,570.03 7 INTERSECTIONS $201,603.95 $65,033.92 FC 163- ILLUMINATION (CONTINUOUS LIGHTING) ALONG THE SEGMENT $77,762.50 TASK REMOVED $0.00 ‐$77,762.50 FC 165 - TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS (PERMANENT) ALL ITS COMPONENTS $70,213.69 SAME AS ORIGINAL $70,213.69 $0.00 DIRECT EXPENSES $1,453.78 SAME AS ORIGINAL $1,453.78 $0.00 TOTAL $286,000.00 $318,500.00 $32,500.00 WA #3 CONSTRUCTION PHASE SERVICES ORIGINAL CONTRACT UPDATED CONTRACT TASK DESIGN FEE TASK DESIGN FEE DIFFERENCE IN DESIGN FEE FC 309 - CONSTRUCTION PHASE SERVICES $36,000.00 SAME AS ORIGINAL $36,000.00 $0.00 TOTAL $36,000.00 $36,000.00 $0.00 SHEET 1 OF 1 FM 521 South Project, Fort Bend County & Texas DOT Proj Number: CSJ : 0000-00-000 PM: Xxxxxxx Roku Date: 8/2/2021 Principal Project Manager Sr. Project Engineer Project Engineer CADD Technician Admin Assist. Sub-total Man-hours Subtotal (cost $) Billing Rate per Hour $189.75 $179.63 $131.56 $125.24 $84.76 $65.78 Task Description PHASE 3 - CONSTRUCTION PHASE SERVICES 1 Review and Respond to Submittals / RFI's / RFP's / etc 2 2 8 12 $ 1,161.60 PHASE 3 EXPENSES 2 Site Visit $ - 3 Postage / Courier $ - 4 Printing / Copies $ - SUBTOTAL PHASE 3 EXPENSES $ - TOTAL PHASE 3 CONSTRUCTION PHASE SERVICES 2 2 8 12 $ 1,161.60 EARTH ENGINEERING, INC. Geotechnical, Materials Testing & Environmen...
Outfall. (Optional) We understand a 48-inch diameter outfall with a depth less that 10-ft be constructed at Fulshear Creek Tributary #2. According to the client, the construction of this outfall may be considered additional service; therefore, it is considered optional. 00000 XX Xxxxxxx 00 X • Xxxxxxx, Xxxxx 00000 • Tel.: 000-000-0000 • Fax: 000-000-0000 Texas • Louisiana • New Mexico • Oklahoma Website: xxx.xxxxxxxxxx.xxx This proposal is divided into three sections. Each section will be discussed and estimated separately. These sections are as follows: o Desktop Geologic Fault Study. o Geotechnical Exploration Study for the pavement and drainage improvements. o Geotechnical Exploration Study for the Outfall (Optional). The scope of our work will be in general accordance with Fort Bend County Geotechnical Guidelines Draft, May 2021. We understand that the scope of our work will not include review of plans and specifications prior to the final design. DESKTOP GEOLOGIC FAULTING The project site is located in Fort Bend County, Texas. Geologic faults are scattered throughout Houston. In general, faults are caused by groundwater and oil removal from the underlying surface. Faults originate several thousand feet below the ground surface and can often cause displacement of the ground surface, causing broken pavement, water lines, and damage to residential and commercial structures. A Desktop Geologic Fault Study will be conducted. A desktop fault study will include a study of published data on surface faults in the area of the site from the Geotech Engineering and Testing Library. A report of our findings will be provided. GEOTECHNICAL STUDY
Outfall. Plans, Specifications & Estimate 4 24 20 14.100 Final Plans, Special Provisions & Estimate 4 20 20 14.100.04 Support WZ Application Process 4 00 Xxxxx Xxxxxx Plan 00 00xx Xxxxxx Waterline 3 37 6 16.1 Material Research, Design & Plan Sheets 3 37 6 NON-CONTINGENT TOTALS $ 7,431 $ 171,747 $ 10,549 $ 2,313 $ 1,394 $ 1,010 $ 1,359 $ 54,691 $ 7,945 $ 127,402 $ 1,389 City xx Xxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx X. Xxxxxxxxxxx T. Van Meter X. Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxx X. Xxxxx X. Xxxxxx X. Xxxxxx X. Xxxxxx X. Xxxxxxxx X. Finnell Labor Summary Engineer I Engineer I Engineer I Sr Engineer Sr Engineer Engineer III Project Controls Specialist Sr Surveyor Surveyor I Hours Dollars Escalation CPI 2.5% after Sep 2021* 103.62 104.61 94.63 195.84 201.73 126.89 92.00 159.32 92.38 82.00 01 Contract Administration & PM Support 20 297 $ 51,708 $ 970 01.01 Project Administration 181 $ 29,538 $ 554 01.02 Project Coordination Meetings 20 116 $ 22,170 $ 416 02 Survey Work 7 33 9 93 141 $ 14,292 $ 268 02.01 Newport Avenue 7 33 9 93 141 $ 14,292 $ 268 02.01.02 Topographic/Improvement Location Xxxxx 2 3 9 43 56 $ 4,927 $ 92 02.01.03 Utility Survey 6 30 50 85 $ 9,365 $ 176 02.02 South Xxxxxx Butte - $ - $ - 03 Geotechnical Investigations and Analysis - $ - $ - 04 Preliminary Reports - $ - $ - 05C Right of Way Real Property Acquisition - $ - $ - 05C.03 Acquisitions - $ - $ - 06 Stormwater Modeling 80 4 96 $ 18,692 $ 350 06.02 Update Model 80 4 96 $ 18,692 $ 350 00 Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx: PS&E 20 11 135 $ 18,749 $ 352 07.100.04 Transportation Design 20 11 91 $ 11,605 $ 218 07.100.07 Special Provisions & Cost Estimate 44 $ 7,144 $ 134 08 South Xxxxxx Butte: PS&E 236 8 262 40 317 1,279 $ 158,785 $ 2,977 08.60 60% Plans, Special Provisions & Estimate 56 8 62 97 303 $ 37,473 $ 1,138 08.60.01 Stormwater Design 56 8 62 97 303 $ 37,473 $ 703 08.90 90% Plans, Special Provisions & Estimate 80 100 20 100 468 $ 58,351 $ 1,094 08.90.01 Stormwater Design 80 80 200 $ 23,235 $ 436 08.90.02 Transportation Design 80 140 $ 16,086 $ 302 08.90.03 Special Provisions & Cost Estimate 20 20 20 128 $ 19,030 $ 357 08.100 Final Plans, Special Provisions & Estimate 100 100 20 120 508 $ 62,961 $ 1,181 08.100.01 Stormwater Design 80 100 220 $ 25,773 $ 483 08.100.02 Transportation Design 80 140 $ 16,086 $ 302 08.100.03 Special Provisions & Cost Estimate 20 20 20 20 148 $ 21,103 $ 396 09 Utility Coordination 65 1 818 $ 105,678 $ 416 09.05 Relocation Time Requirement Letters 162 $ 22,177 $ 416 09.06 Joint Utility Trench 65 1 140 $ 17,078 $ 320 09.07 Sou...
Outfall. The terminus of a sewer system, or the point of emergence of any waterborne sewage, industrial waste or other wastes or the effluent therefrom, into the waters of the State. Range The minimum and maximum instantaneous measurements for the reporting period must remain between the two values shown. Receiving Water The classified waters of the state to which the listed outfall discharges. Sample Frequency / Sample Type / Units See NYSDEC’s “DMR Manual for Completing the Discharge Monitoring Report for the SPDES” for information on sample frequency, type and units. PERMIT LIMITS, LEVELS AND MONITORING OUTFALL LIMITATIONS APPLY RECEIVING WATER EFFECTIVE EXPIRING 001 All Year (unless otherwise specified) Chemung Canal (Old Barge Canal Channel) Date of Construction Completion (DCC)3 10/31/2022 PARAMETER EFFLUENT LIMITATION MONITORING REQUIREMENTS FN Type Limit Units Limit Units Sample Frequency Sample Type Location Inf. Eff. Flow Monthly Average 1.2 MGD Continuous Recorder X Flow Daily Maximum Monitor MGD Continuous Recorder X CBOD5 Daily Maximum Monitor mg/L Monitor lbs/d 1/Week 24-hr. Comp. X X 1 UOD Daily Maximum 34 mg/L 340 lbs/d 1/Week Calculated X 2 Total Suspended Solids (TSS) Monthly Average 30 mg/L 300 lbs/d 1/Week 24-hr. Comp. X X 1 Total Suspended Solids (TSS) 7-Day Average 45 mg/L 450 lbs/d 1/Week 24-hr. Comp. X X Settleable Solids Daily Maximum 0.3 mL/L 2/Day Grab X X pH Range 6.5–8.5 SU 2/Day Grab X X Temperature Daily Maximum Monitor Deg F 2/Day Grab X X 4 Total Phosphorus (as P) Monthly Average 0.5 mg/L Monitor lbs/d 1/Week 24-hr. Comp. X Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (TKN) (as N) Daily Maximum Monitor mg/L Monitor lbs/d 1/Week 24-hr. Comp. X Mercury Daily Maximum 50 ng/L Monitor lbs/d 1/Month Grab X EFFLUENT DISINFECTIONRequired Seasonal from May 1st - October 31st Limit Units Limit Units Sample Frequency Sample Type Inf. Eff. FN Coliform, Fecal 30-Day Geometric Mean 200 No./ 100 mL 1/Week Grab X Coliform, Fecal 7-Day Geometric Mean 400 No./ 100 mL 1/Week Grab X WHOLE EFFLUENT TOXICITY (WET) TESTING Limit Units Action Level Units Sample Frequency Sample Type Inf. Eff. FN WET - Acute Invertebrate See footnote 0.30 TUa Quarterly See footnote X 5 WET - Acute Vertebrate See footnote 0.30 TUa Quarterly See footnote X 5 WET - Chronic Invertebrate See footnote 4.9 TUc Quarterly See footnote X 5 WET - Chronic Vertebrate See footnote 4.9 TUc Quarterly See footnote X 5 Footnotes can be found on Page 4 of this permit. FOOTNOTES:
Outfall. Siting Desktop Study Complete a desktop study to evaluate the suitability of the potential outfall sites identified during the field survey. Desktop analyses will include: Historic aerial photograph analysis to inform river dynamics and stability (instability) through time. Biological desktop analysis to identify areas of prime fish use and habitat (if appropriate, may include communication with ODFW and local watershed and fisheries groups to better understand key fish habitats). Geomorphic and terrain analysis – Valley and floodplain terrain documented in existing high-resolution LiDAR data) will be key to informing relative feasibility of the considered outfall locations. Hydraulics analysis will include evaluation of existing information such as river bathymetry, hydraulic models, and seasonal hydrology in the river relative to the annual production of wastewater. The team will also generally evaluate channel migration and river sediment dynamics to inform relative stability at the considered sites.
