Open Discussion Clause Samples

The Open Discussion clause establishes a framework for parties to communicate openly and address issues or concerns as they arise during the course of their agreement. Typically, this clause encourages both parties to engage in good faith discussions before escalating disputes to formal resolution processes, such as mediation or litigation. By fostering early and transparent communication, the clause aims to resolve misunderstandings efficiently and prevent minor issues from developing into larger conflicts.
Open Discussion. The company and its employees are committed to open and ▇▇▇▇▇ discussion between the management and employees on any matter.
View SourceView Similar (3)
Open Discussion. The Company and its Employees are committed to an open and ▇▇▇▇▇ discussion between supervisors and Employees on any matter relating to employment conditions. If the Company and the Employees wish to develop a consultative committee they may do so. The consultative committee would discuss and review matters such as use of contractors within the business and opportunities for further full time positions and the use of Overseas or Interstate resources. The committee will meet on a quarterly basis. This does not prejudice the rights of the Employees to Union representation where necessary.
View Source
Open Discussion. The Company and its employees are committed to an open and ▇▇▇▇▇ discussion between supervisors and employees on any matter relating to employment conditions without third party interference. This does not prejudice the rights of the employees to union representation where necessary. All parties will also assist in the consultation process if conflict or the need for counselling arises due to poor performance or attitude problems. This process will be conducted in accordance with current Industrial Relations regulations.
View Source
Open Discussion. “Le specificità in Piemonte del Settore Automotive, le prospettive e le proposte di azioni future” Moderatore: Ing. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇, Responsabile “Innovation Point” presso AMMA - Aziende Meccaniche Meccatroniche Associate Awareness raising workshop in Regensburg  Presentation of the SAGE-project to the Cluster Community  Information on Cluster Activities & ongoing Projects  Networking • Greeting (▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇) • Actual Cluster themes: o Presentation of EU-Project SAGE „Safe and Green Road Vehicles“ (▇▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇) o NEMO Network „Intelligent Charging Infrastructure“ (▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇, Netzwerkmanagement IT-Inkubator Ostbayern) o Integration of E-Mobility into the Distribution Grid (Prof. ▇▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇, Univ. of Applied Sciences Regensburg) o Intelligent Voltage Control (▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇, REWAG) o E-Mobility at the City of Regensburg (▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, Dept. of Economic Developement) o Hybrid bus – latest Development from Regensburg (▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, AVL Software & Functions) o Bavarian E-Mobility showcase Region – actual Status (▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, EU Coordinator) o PG Elektrus – the exclusive e-Roadster from Regensburg (▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇, PG Trade & Sales) • The SAGE project was introduced to the Cluster community; their participation possibilities and the opportunities were explained; the Cluster involvement in WP 2, WP 3 and WP 7 was presented. The methodology of WP2 including the timeline for questionnaire, interviews, and regional strategic workshop was discussed. The cluster community is aware of the SAGE project. The workshop was combined with the first annual cluster meeting. The members were informed about Cluster projects and activities.
View Source
Open Discussion. In the second part of the seminar, an open discussion took place, analyzing in more detail the implications of the installation of smart meters and their proper and effective use, and elaborating concerns of the locals with regards to issues such as the improvement of the local electricity supply quality, the potential for energy saving, net metering opportunities and DSM. More precisely the following points were identified and were further discussed.  There was a concern on the workload and interventions required for the installation of the smart meter and DSM solution at the household level, with the need for a demonstration of the proposed solution being quite pronounced, in order for the local consumers to familiarize with its operation prior to installation. To this end, it was understood among the participants that the more data is collected in advance with regards to the characteritsics of each household (e.g. through questionnaires) the more effective the installation and adaptation of the proposed solution will be, aiming also to the development of a common, flexible and adaptable solution and not to a plethora of tailored ones. With regards to the familiarization of the locals with a demo, it was agreed that once Eurosol can provide a first prototype, this will be effectively used for further training of the locals.  At the same time, the idea of having a central display presenting the entire island and the Livadia community real-time electricity consumption (already measured from HEDNO in the project context) was much favoured by all seminar participants.  The problem of frequent power cuts and electricity supply shortcomings that in many cases damage electrical appliances of the locals was also stressed, in the sense of how could the DSM and smart meter solution provide protection against this phenomenon. It was commonly agreed that this should be communicated to Eurosol during the TILOS workshop.  In a parallel discussion, all participants were encouraged to analyze their electricity bills and identify the main sources of consumption along with the potential for energy saving under minimum interventions. At the same time, the net metering PV solution was mainly brought up by hotel owners, seeking for advise on how to reduce their electricity bills in a cost-effective manner. TILOS D8.2_Training Seminars for Smart Metering & DSM - 2nd Series  Finally, the concept of DSM under the operation of a smart grid locally was discussed, with the se...
View Source

Related to Open Discussion

  • Informal Discussion If an employee has a problem relating to a work situation, the employee is encouraged to request a meeting with his or her immediate supervisor to discuss the problem in an effort to clarify the issue and to work cooperatively towards settlement.

  • Mutual Discussions The Employer and the Union acknowledge the mutual benefits to be derived from dialogue between the parties and are prepared to discuss matters of common interest.

  • Informal Discussions Before a written grievance is submitted, informal discussions will take place between the aggrieved party, the principal or supervisor and Education Minnesota – OSSEO representative. Through these discussions the parties will attempt to resolve the problem. Subd. 2. Level I: If the grievance is not resolved through informal discussions, the aggrieved party may submit the grievance in writing to the principal or supervisor. A copy of such written grievance must simultaneously be filed with Human Resources. The Director, Human Resources will set a meeting date within five (5) days of receipt of the written grievance. The Director, Human Resources will give a written decision on the grievance to the parties involved within ten (10) days after the meeting. Subd. 3. Level II: In the event the grievance is not resolved in Level I, the decision rendered may be appealed to the superintendent of schools, provided such appeal is made in writing within five (5) days after receipt of the decision in Level I. If a grievance is properly appealed to the superintendent, the superintendent or designee will set a time to meet regarding the grievance within fifteen (15) days after receipt of the appeal. Within ten (10) days after the meeting, the superintendent or designee will issue a decision in writing to the parties involved. Subd. 4. Level III: In the event the grievance is not resolved in Level II, the decision rendered may be appealed to the School Board, provided such appeal is made in writing within five (5) days after receipt of the decision in Level II. If a grievance is properly appealed to the School Board, the School Board will set a time to hear the grievance within twenty (20) days after the receipt of the appeal. Within twenty (20) days after the meeting, the School Board will issue its decision in writing to the parties involved. At the option of the School Board, a committee or representative(s) of the School Board may be designated by the School Board to hear the appeal at this level and report its findings and recommendations to the School Board. The School Board will then render its decision.

  • Discussion Staff has reviewed the proposal relative to all relevant policies and advise that it is reasonably consistent with the intent of the MPS. Attachment B provides an evaluation of the proposed development agreement in relation to the relevant MPS policies.

  • Settlement Discussions This Agreement is part of a proposed settlement of matters that could otherwise be the subject of litigation among the Parties hereto. Nothing herein shall be deemed an admission of any kind. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 408 and any applicable state rules of evidence, this Agreement and all negotiations relating thereto shall not be admissible into evidence in any proceeding other than to prove the existence of this Agreement or in a proceeding to enforce the terms of this Agreement.