Key Computation Complexity Comparison Clause Samples

Key Computation Complexity Comparison. In this section, we compare the communication and computation complexity of known GKA protocols. During the comparison, we take into account the complexity of each par- ticipant. Moreover, for the communication complexity, only transmitted messages by each participant are considered. Protocol Cc of a participant Protocol in [26] (N + 1)|q| + 2|p| Protocol in [27] (N + 2)|q| + 4|p| Protocol in [28] (N + 2)|q| + 4|p| Protocol in [23] (N + 2)|q| + 4|p| KAP-PBC [11] (N + 4)|q| + 2|p| GKAP-MANET [6] 2|q| + 5|p| B-GKAP 5|q| + 2|p| According to Table 5.10, B-GKAP is more efficient than most of the protocols in terms of communication complexity for each participant. Additionally, in terms of total commu- nication complexity, the other protocols perform network transmission to every other partic- ipant in the key agreement group. On the other hand, B-GKAP participants only transmit messages to the limited number of network participants. In other words, when the number of participants increases in B-GKAP, the number of network transmissions increases linearly instead of exponentially. Protocol Cc of a participant Protocol in [23] O(N)Texp Protocol in [5] ≤ O(log3 N)Texp Protocol in [9] ≤ O(log2 N)Texp Protocol in [61] O(log2 N)Texp GKAP-MANET [6] O(N)Texp KAP-PBC [11] O(N)Texp
View SourceView Similar (2)

Related to Key Computation Complexity Comparison

  • Revenue Metering The Connecting Transmission Owner’s revenue metering will be located on the generator side of the 115kV breaker at the ▇▇▇▇▇ Solar Collector Substation and will consist of: • three (3) combination current/voltage transformer (“CT/VT”) units (manufacturer and model ABB/▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ KXM-550, GE Grid Solutions KOTEF ▇▇▇.▇▇, or other equivalent specified by Connecting Transmission Owner); and • one (1) revenue meter. The ratios of the CTs and VTs will be provided by Connecting Transmission Owner upon its review of the Interconnection Customer’s design documents. (Note: Connecting Transmission Owner’s revenue metering CTs and VTs cannot be used to feed the Interconnection Customer’s check meter.) SERVICE AGREEMENT NO. 2556

  • STATEWIDE ACHIEVEMENT TESTING When CONTRACTOR is a NPS, per implementation of Senate Bill 484, CONTRACTOR shall administer all Statewide assessments within the California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (“CAASPP”), Desired Results Developmental Profile (“DRDP”), California Alternative Assessment (“CAA”), achievement and abilities tests (using LEA-authorized assessment instruments), the Fitness Gram, , the English Language Proficiency Assessments for California (“ELPAC”), and as appropriate to the student, and mandated by LEA pursuant to LEA and state and federal guidelines. CONTRACTOR is subject to the alternative accountability system developed pursuant to Education Code section 52052, in the same manner as public schools. Each LEA student placed with CONTRACTOR by the LEA shall be tested by qualified staff of CONTRACTOR in accordance with that accountability program. ▇▇▇ shall provide test administration training to CONTRACTOR’S qualified staff. CONTRACTOR shall attend LEA test training and comply with completion of all coding requirements as required by ▇▇▇.

  • Mileage Measurement Where required, the mileage measurement for LIS rate elements is determined in the same manner as the mileage measurement for V&H methodology as outlined in NECA Tariff No. 4.

  • Performance Measurement The Uniform Guidance requires completion of OMB-approved standard information collection forms (the PPR). The form focuses on outcomes, as related to the Federal Award Performance Goals that awarding Federal agencies are required to detail in the Awards.

  • Performance Measure Grantee will adhere to the performance measures requirements documented in