KCI Clause Samples

The KCI (Knowledge, Consent, and Information) clause primarily serves to ensure that all parties involved in an agreement are fully aware of, have consented to, and have been provided with the necessary information regarding the terms and obligations of the contract. In practice, this clause may require parties to confirm that they have read and understood the contract, received all relevant disclosures, and voluntarily agree to the stipulated terms. By including a KCI clause, the contract aims to prevent disputes arising from claims of ignorance or lack of consent, thereby promoting transparency and informed decision-making among the parties.
KCI. It is an attack where the adversary is able to use the compromised long-term key of a party A to masquerade to A as another party B. It is obvi- ous that when the long-term secret key of A is compromised, the adversary can masquerade as A to other users. For the converse to happen, the adversary inter- cepts the message that B sends to A. The intercepted message is then modified with its own chosen values for the ephemeral secrets and the message is sent to A, effectively adversary masquerades as B to A. It then computes the session key. This attack works in [FAA14] since there is no correctness check. Our pro- tocol avoids this problem by two ways - adding the signature and then checking the correctness and by making the key components dependent on SB. For the adversary to be able to compute the session key it would need to successfully compute the values of K(1) and K(2). This requires the knowledge of SB which the adversary is not aware of. This shows our protocol’s resilience to KCI. We now present the formal security proof of our protocol. The proof is based on the security model described for Identity Based Key Agreement in the Multi- ple PKG paradigm, IBKA-mPKG which is based on the ▇▇▇ model. The scheme is proved secure under the Gap ▇▇▇▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ (GDH) assumption in the random oracle model. The security proof is modeled as a game between the challenger and the adversary. Theorem 1. Under the GDH assumption in G and the RO model,the protocol in section 6 is IBKA − mPKG-secure.
View Source
KCI. It is an attack where the adversary is able to use the compromised long-term key of a party A to masquerade as another party B to A. It is obvious that when the long-term secret key of A is compromised, the adversary can masquerade as A to other users. For the converse to happen, the adversary intercepts the message that B sends to A. The intercepted message is then modified with its own chosen values for the ephemeral secrets and the message is sent to A, effectively adversary masquerades as B to A. It then computes the session key. This attack works in [FAA14] since there is no correctness check. Our protocol avoids this problem by two ways - adding the signature and then checking the correctness and by making the key components dependent on SB and SA. For the adversary to be able to compute the session key it would need to successfully compute the values of K(1) and
View Source
KCI. The term "KCI" shall mean Kidney Care, Inc., a Mississippi not-for-profit corporation.
View Source

Related to KCI

  • Borrower Products Except as described on Schedule 5.11, no Intellectual Property owned by Borrower or Borrower Product has been or is subject to any actual or, to the knowledge of Borrower, threatened litigation, proceeding (including any proceeding in the United States Patent and Trademark Office or any corresponding foreign office or agency) or outstanding decree, order, judgment, settlement agreement or stipulation that restricts in any manner Borrower’s use, transfer or licensing thereof or that may affect the validity, use or enforceability thereof. There is no decree, order, judgment, agreement, stipulation, arbitral award or other provision entered into in connection with any litigation or proceeding that obligates Borrower to grant licenses or ownership interest in any future Intellectual Property related to the operation or conduct of the business of Borrower or Borrower Products. Borrower has not received any written notice or claim, or, to the knowledge of Borrower, oral notice or claim, challenging or questioning Borrower’s ownership in any Intellectual Property (or written notice of any claim challenging or questioning the ownership in any licensed Intellectual Property of the owner thereof) or suggesting that any third party has any claim of legal or beneficial ownership with respect thereto nor, to Borrower’s knowledge, is there a reasonable basis for any such claim. Neither Borrower’s use of its Intellectual Property nor the production and sale of Borrower Products infringes the Intellectual Property or other rights of others.

  • Non-Company Business Except with the prior written consent of the Board, Executive will not during the term of Executive’s employment with the Company undertake or engage in any other employment, occupation or business enterprise, other than ones in which Executive is a passive investor. Executive may engage in civic and not-for-profit activities so long as such activities do not materially interfere with the performance of Executive’s duties hereunder.

  • EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES The State reserves the right to modify the terms of this Contract or any future Periodic Recruitments, to allow for emerging technologies. OGS reserves the right to include such technology(ies) hereunder or to issue a formal modification or amendment to this Contract.

  • Other Products If you ask, we will provide you with information on any other home equity products we offer.

  • Competing Products The provisions of Section 21 are set forth on attached Exhibit H and are incorporated in this Section 21 by this reference.