Common use of Interpretive Letter Clause in Contracts

Interpretive Letter. The parties intend for this Confirmation to constitute a “Contract” as described in the letter dated October 6, 2003 submitted by Xxxxxx X. Xxxxxx and Xxxxxx X. Xxxxxxxxx to Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx of the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Staff”) to which the Staff responded in an interpretive letter dated October 9, 2003.

Interpretive Letter. The parties intend for this Master Confirmation and each Supplemental Confirmation to constitute a “Contract” as described in the letter dated October 6, 2003 submitted by Xxxxxx X. Xxxxxx and Xxxxxx X. Xxxxxxxxx to Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx of the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Staff”) ), to which the Staff responded in an interpretive letter dated October 9, 2003.

Interpretive Letter. The parties intend for this Forward Confirmation to constitute a “Contract” as described in the letter dated October 6, 2003 submitted by Xxxxxx X. Xxxxxx and Xxxxxx X. Xxxxxxxxx on behalf of Gxxxxxx, Sxxxx & Co. to Xxxxx Pxxxx Xxxxxxxx of the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Staff”) to which the Staff responded in an interpretive letter dated October 9, 20032003 (the “Interpretive Letter”).

Interpretive Letter. The parties intend for this Confirmation to constitute a “Contract” as described in the letter dated October 6, 2003 submitted by Xxxxxx Rxxxxx X. Xxxxxx and Xxxxxx Lxxxxx X. Xxxxxxxxx to Xxxxx Pxxxx Xxxxxxxx of the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Staff”) to which the Staff responded in an interpretive letter dated October 9, 2003.

Interpretive Letter. The parties intend for this Confirmation to constitute a “Contract” as described in the letter dated October 6, 2003 submitted by Xxxxxx X. Xxxxxx and Xxxxxx X. Xxxxxxxxx to Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx of the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Staff”) to which the Staff responded in an interpretive letter dated October 9, 20032003 (the “Interpretive Letter”).

Interpretive Letter. The parties intend for this Confirmation to constitute a “Contract” as described in the letter dated October 6, 2003 submitted by Xxxxxx X. Xxxxxx and Xxxxxx X. Xxxxxxxxx on behalf of Xxxxxxx, Xxxxx & Co. to Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx of the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Staff”) to which the Staff responded in an interpretive letter dated October 9, 2003.

Interpretive Letter. The parties intend for this Confirmation to constitute a “Contract” as described in the letter dated October 6, 2003 submitted by Xxxxxx Rxxxxx X. Xxxxxx and Xxxxxx Lxxxxx X. Xxxxxxxxx to Xxxxx Pxxxx Xxxxxxxx of the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Staff”) to which the Staff responded in an interpretive letter dated October 9, 20032003 (the “Interpretive Letter”).

Interpretive Letter. The parties intend Each party intends for this Confirmation to constitute a “Contract” as described in the letter dated October 6, 2003 submitted by Xxxxxx X. Xxxxxx and Xxxxxx X. Xxxxxxxxx to Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx of the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Staff”) to which the Staff responded in an interpretive interpreted letter dated October 9, 20032003 (the “Interpretive Letter”) and agrees to take all actions, and omit to take any actions, reasonably requested by the other party for this Transaction to comply with the Interpretive Letter.

Interpretive Letter. The parties intend for this Confirmation to constitute a “Contract” as described in the letter dated October 6, 2003 submitted by Xxxxxx X. Xxxxxx and Xxxxxx X. Xxxxxxxxx to Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx of the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Staff”) to which the Staff responded in an interpretive letter dated October 9, 20032003 (the “Interpretive Letter”).

Interpretive Letter. The parties intend for this Confirmation to constitute a “Contract” as described in the letter dated October 6, 2003 submitted by Xxxxxx X. Xxxxxx and Xxxxxx X. Xxxxxxxxx on behalf of Gxxxxxx, Sxxxx & Co. to Xxxxx Pxxxx Xxxxxxxx of the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Staff”) to which the Staff responded in an interpretive letter dated October 9, 2003.