Internal Competition Clause Samples
The Internal Competition clause establishes rules for how a company manages situations where its own teams or divisions may compete against each other for the same business opportunities or resources. Typically, this clause outlines procedures for prioritizing projects, allocating resources, or resolving conflicts of interest between internal groups, such as by setting up internal bidding processes or designating decision-makers. Its core function is to ensure fair and transparent handling of internal competition, preventing disputes and inefficiencies that could arise from overlapping efforts within the organization.
Internal Competition. (1) The Committee shall review all internal applications, interview the applicants as it sees fit and, if a suitable applicant is found, make a recommendation of appointment to the Peer Evaluation Committee. The Committee may be requested by the University Librarian to substantiate its rejection of a candidate. Unsuccessful applicants shall be notified promptly of the decision not to appoint them.
(2) The Committee shall make every effort to reach agreement upon a candidate. However, in those instances where the supervisor is in disagreement with the other two committee members, the matter shall be referred to the University Librarian who shall forthwith submit his/her resolution of this disagreement to the Peer Evaluation Committee.
(3) Within two (2) working days of receipt of the name of a suitable candidate from the Committee, the Peer Evaluation Committee shall review the candidate's qualifications in the light of the minimum criteria mentioned in Article 9.7(a)(i) and (ii). If the Peer Evaluation Committee approves the candidate, it shall recommend to the University Librarian that an offer of employment be made at a specified rank commensurate with the experience and qualifications of the candidate.
(4) The University Librarian shall decide whether to reject the recommendation or to accept and forward it to the President. No more than seven (7) working days shall elapse between the time the recommendation is made by the Peer Evaluation Committee and either: -the Peer Evaluation Committee and the Committee are informed of a decision to reject the candidate and of the grounds for doing so; or -a written offer is sent to the candidate. Both the Peer Evaluation Committee and the Committee shall receive all particulars of the offer excepting only salary.
(5) If the candidate rejects the offer, the University Librarian shall decide either to continue negotiations with the candidate, or to inform the Peer Evaluation Committee and the Committee that the competition is to be continued.
(6) If an internal candidate accepts an offer of a different position within the Library, it shall not adversely affect the employee's eligibility for career development increments, or any other increment to his/her nominal salary, or his/her eligibility for sabbatical leave, or his/her eligibility for or status of confirmation or Professional Achievement Award.
(7) If a professional librarian employee should prove unsatisfactory in his/her new position, transfer from that posi...
Internal Competition. (1) The Committee shall review all internal applications, interview the applicants as it sees fit and, if a suitable applicant is found, make a recommendation of appointment to the Peer Evaluation Committee. The Committee may be requested by the University Librarian to substantiate its rejection of a candidate. Unsuccessful applicants shall be notified promptly of the decision not to appoint them.
Internal Competition. (1) The Committee shall review all internal applications, interview the applicants as it sees fit and, if a suitable applicant is found, make a recommendation of appointment to the Peer Evaluation Committee. The Committee may be requested by the University Librarian to substantiate its rejection of a candidate. Unsuccessful applicants shall be notified promptly of the decision not to appoint them.
(2) The Committee shall make every effort to reach agreement upon a candidate. However, in those instances where the supervisor is in disagreement with the other two committee members, the matter shall be referred to the University Librarian who shall forthwith submit his/her resolution of this disagreement to the Peer Evaluation Committee.
(3) Within two (2) working days of receipt of the name of a suitable candidate from the Committee, the Peer Evaluation Committee shall review the candidate's qualifications in the light of the minimum criteria mentioned in Article 9.7(a)(i) and (ii). If the Peer Evaluation Committee approves the candidate, it shall recommend to the University Librarian that an offer of employment be made at a specified rank commensurate with the experience and qualifications of the candidate.
Internal Competition. (1) The Committee shall review all internal applications, interview the applicants as it sees fit and, if a suitable applicant is found, make a recommendation of appointment to the Peer Evaluation Committee. The Committee may be requested by the University Librarian to substantiate its rejection of a candidate. Unsuccessful applicants shall be notified promptly of the decision not to appoint them. The Committee shall make every effort to reach agreement upon a candidate. However, in those instances where the supervisor is in disagreement with the other two committee members, the matter shall be referred to the University Librarian who shall forthwith submit his/her resolution of this disagreement to the Peer Evaluation Committee.