Common use of Intercept Devices Clause in Contracts

Intercept Devices. Should either Party receive a court order authorizing surveillance on the other Party’s End User, the Party in receipt shall refer such order to the Party that serves the End User. Should a court order pertain to an AT&T Local customer (trap & trace, pen register or wiretap) or an ALS Type II customer (pen register or wiretap), the Party in receipt will request the issuing authority to amend the order, naming both Parties, and serve both Parties concurrently. SBC-AMERITECH shall provide law enforcement with all necessary assistance, including plant information and local loop access, to facilitate implementation of court orders pertaining to pen registers or wiretaps. Additionally, SBC-AMERITECH shall provision on its equipment trap & trace orders pertaining to AT&T Local customers. As specified in Section 6.4.3, above SBC- AMERITECH may bill the appropriate law enforcement agency for these services under its customary practices. Once AT&T implements CALEA solutions in its switches, AT&T will assume full responsibility for the implementation of court-ordered surveillance on ALS Type II customers.

Intercept Devices. Should either Party receive a court order authorizing surveillance on the other Party’s End User, the Party in receipt shall refer such order to the Party that serves the End User. Should a court order pertain to an AT&T Local customer (trap & trace, pen register or wiretap) or an ALS Type II customer (pen register or wiretap), the Party in receipt will request the issuing authority to amend the order, naming both Parties, and serve both Parties concurrently. SBC-AMERITECH shall provide law enforcement with all necessary assistance, including plant information and local loop access, to facilitate implementation of court orders pertaining to pen registers or wiretaps. Additionally, SBC-AMERITECH shall provision on its equipment trap & trace orders pertaining to AT&T Local customers. As specified in Section 6.4.3, above SBC- SBC-AMERITECH may bill ▇▇▇▇ the appropriate law enforcement agency for these services under its customary practices. Once AT&T implements CALEA solutions in its switches, AT&T will assume full responsibility for the implementation of court-ordered surveillance on ALS Type II customers.

Intercept Devices. Should either Party receive a court order authorizing surveillance on the other Party’s End User, the Party in receipt shall refer such order to the Party that serves the End User. Should a court order pertain to an AT&T Local customer (trap & trace, pen register or wiretap) or an ALS Type II customer (pen register or wiretap), the Party in receipt will request the issuing authority to amend the order, naming both Parties, and serve both Parties concurrently. SBC-AMERITECH shall provide law enforcement with all necessary assistance, including plant information and local loop access, to facilitate implementation of court orders pertaining to pen registers or wiretaps. Additionally, SBC-SBC- AMERITECH shall provision on its equipment trap & trace orders pertaining to AT&T Local customers. As specified in Section 6.4.3, above SBC- SBC-AMERITECH may bill the appropriate law enforcement agency for these services under its customary practices. Once AT&T implements CALEA solutions in its switches, AT&T will assume full responsibility for the implementation of court-ordered surveillance on ALS Type II customers.