Hierarchical Sample Clauses

Hierarchical. The hierarchy model assumes that the entire journey from China to the West is coordinated centrally. Different smuggling groups are ultimately responsible to a snakehead di tutti snakeheads. This supra-organizer ensures that the migrants are helped to reach their final destination by a chain of smuggling groups in different countries. In China it is claimed that such individuals are situated in the West, out of the reach of the Chinese police (Interpol Beijing, 2001: 23; ▇▇▇▇▇ & ▇▇▇▇, 2002). According to Western sources, such individuals are situated in China, and that is how they manage to elude the Western authorities (▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, 2003: 243). Several Dutch government officials also hold the latter view. The head organizer is said to be situated in China, not in the Netherlands (B22). The fact that the Dutch-based organizers take on assignments is considered evidence of this the- ory. Through telephone contact the Chinese smugglers in the Netherlands are notified, for example, that new groups of smuggled people are on their way. Des- tinations are sometimes adhered to and sometimes altered. In one case, a migrant decided not to continue his journey to Britain following a telephone con- versation with an organizer in China. This organizer informed the organizer that the migrant was allowed to “disembark” in the Netherlands (case 98). Financing is another important reason for smugglers in the Netherlands and in China to consult with each other. While most migrants claim they had to pay 20,000 euros for their passage to the West, the Dutch smugglers earn a great deal less, for example about 5,000 euros for the Netherlands–Great Britain route. And various expenses have to be paid from that fee. For example, the organizer has to pay the Dutch transporters in cash. That can cost up to 1,000 euros per smuggled migrant, so he has to have a considerable amount of cash on hand. In addition, the other members of the smuggling group have to be compensated, cars or safe houses rented, food bought, etc. If the journey is not carried out in a clandestine fashion, passports and airline tickets have to be purchased. The net profit for the Chinese smuggling group is therefore closer to 1,000 to 3,000 per smuggled person (although because smuggling groups bring in a high volume of migrants each month, the total profit is probably considerable). In one exception, an organizer in the Netherlands was paid 28,000 euros per smuggled person, but only because, instead of Great Britai...
Hierarchical. When smuggling operations are arranged by bureaucratic groups, it is plausible that the smugglers work together over a long term in fixed combinations. The fol- lowing statements based on the results of the file analysis show some truth in this proposition. First of all, continuity was very common. In several major investigations smugglers were tapped and observed for a long time, sometimes for over a year. During that time many smuggling operations were attempted. In most attempts, the same individuals worked closely together and performed the same functions. It is therefore possible to distinguish separate smuggling groups. The changes that occurred were mostly a matter of convenience. For example, a wife took over her husband’s smuggling operations after he was arrested. At first, her husband advised her from prison (during visiting hours or by telephone), but she quickly began acting autonomously (case 32). Secondly, the continuity was probably reinforced through affective relation- ships like a shared family background. In case 23, for example, two brothers and a cousin worked together. In another case, two of the organizer’s sisters abroad were involved (case 9). Married couples were also encountered (cases 23, 28, 31, 84 and 98). However, family ties within smuggling groups constitute the minor- ity. The family factor is therefore not conclusive.
Hierarchical the scheme is decentralized through a hierarchy where intermediate nodes in the hierarchy can derive the secret keys for each of its children without any limitations or prior knowledge on the number of such children or their identities; – Resilient: the scheme is fully resilient against compromise of any number of leaves in the hierarchy, and of a threshold number of nodes in each of the upper levels of the hierarchy. Several schemes in the literature have three of these four properties, but the schemes in this work are the first to possess all four. This makes them well-suited for environments such as MANETs and tactical net- works which are very dynamic, have significant bandwidth and energy constraints, and where many nodes are vulnerable to compromise. We provide rigorous analysis of the proposed schemes and discuss implemen- tations aspects.
Hierarchical multiple regression analysis predicting child’s gender stereotypes from maternal and paternal gender stereotypes and child gender (N = 172) ΔR² β Step 1 .05 Maternal stereotypes (AIP) .28** Maternal stereotypes (IAT) .12 Maternal stereotypes (CRSRAS) Maternal educational level -.03 .04 Paternal stereotypes (AIP) .04 Paternal stereotypes (IAT) -.08 Paternal stereotypes (CRSRAS) Paternal educational level .04 -.20* Child gender -.05 Step 2 .03* Maternal stereotypes (AIP) x child gender -.24* Total R² .08