Future Work. Any future work of the nature generally performed by pharmacists created by the Employer shall be performed by members of the bargaining unit as herein set forth.
Future Work. Any future work of the nature generally performed by retail clerks created by the Employer shall be performed by members of the bargaining unit as herein set forth.
Future Work. 15 GAAP ................................................................................ 15
Future Work. In accordance with Article 120 of the Agreement the Parties shall commence negotiations on investment on a mutually advantageous basis in due course.
Future Work. In this chapter, a proposed architecture for the delivery of a data audit chain for RCM in GB rail and other industrial contexts has been presented. The next step is for the proposed architecture to be implemented and trialled with real-world data. As there are no one-size-fits-all platforms for blockchain projects, identifying the most suitable deployment platform is critical to the success of this work. A trade-off study was carried out that compared four of the most commonly adopted blockchain platforms: Ethereum [26], [27], Fabric [28], Sawtooth [29], and Iroha [30], based on the parameters set out in Table 1. Table 1: Trade-off analysis between Ethereum, Fabric, Sawtooth, and Iroha. Criteria Ethereum Fabric Sawtooth Iroha Supports SC Consensus algorithm modularity Built-in components for managing identities Supports payment in fiat currency Proficient in maintaining different privacy levels between users Of particular interest was the fact that for any SC execution, the Ethereum chain incurred costs (gas) in its native payment currency (Ether), while the Fabric, Sawtooth, and Iroha Hyperledger systems are cryptocurrency-independent, and payment was possible in fiat currencies. Further to this, because of the voting-based consensus algorithms adopted in Hyperledger platforms, there is no requirement for time- and power-consuming consensus algorithms. The associated performance characteristic ensures quick access to provider information, which would be a key criterion for most RCM use cases. The proposed framework requires differentiation between users to ensure the privacy of their transactions, i.e., not all agreements and payment processes are open to all network users. Any consumer may opt to have a private contract with a provider, and to keep the costs of sharing the data secret from those not participating in that agreement. The Ethereum chain treats all users identically, and all transactions are open and available to all network participants. Hyperledger networks by comparison are able to fulfil this criterion by one of several mechanisms; Xxxxxx, for example, establishes a different channel to isolate parties requiring private agreements and cost allocations; changing the identity namespace in the transaction family on the Sawtooth chain would limit access to specific identities; and specifying guidelines for access management in Iroha would retain easy role-based access at different stages. In the futur...
Future Work. For future expansion at existing Access Points, or at splice points that are not access points if requested (and if possible), McLeodUSA will perform the necessary splicing upon written or email request by IRU Grantee at its cost. Normal requests for splicing shall be submitted at least ten (10) days prior to the requested splicing date, and expedited requests shall be submitted at least seventy-two (72) hours prior to the requested splicing date. IRU Grantee will pay an expedite fee for each expedited splicing request in the amount specified in Exhibit A. McLeodUSA shall obtain any and all permits necessary for such splicing. IRU Grantee agrees that it will not perform any splicing or interfere in any manner with the McLeodUSA Cable at any time for any reason. The cost of splicing Fibers into McLeodUSA Cable will be borne at all times by the IRU Grantee in accordance with Article V herein.
Future Work. The Parties to this Collective Agreement recognize the changing nature of the public transportation industry and agree that those changes call for the introduction of innovative and creative means of delivering those services in a cost effective and efficient manner. Therefore, notwithstanding the exclusions contained in Article 2.07.1 (4), the Parties agree to establish a joint committee (Alternative Service Committee) charged with the responsibility to explore, and where feasible, recommend to BC Transit, alternative public transportation service models and methods of designing and implementing these services in-house in a cost-effective manner rather than contracting out operations.
Future Work. All future work awarded from this bid shall be coordinated with the District’s Operations Director or his or her designee and the Contractor. No work shall be started until scheduling has been agreed upon by all Parties.
Future Work. 1. The Commission shall establish procedures for the establishment of necessary disciplines relating to:
Future Work. The parties agree that should future work be assigned to WEMS [e.g., USEC performed PORTS/facility support service operations, surveillance or maintenance, pre- Decontamination & Decommissioning (D&D) activities, etc.], WEMS shall recognize USW Local 689 as the bargaining representative and hire employees pursuant to this Agreement for work outlined in Section 11(b) of this Article (Scope of Work). The parties agree, subject to negotiations and ratification, to reopen portions of this Agreement to incorporate mutually agreeable terms and conditions related to the performance of such new work scope with respect to job classifications and related rates of pay.
